阿三太牛了 (转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
s*t
1 楼
Most people are missing this "DO NO HARM" clause.
(4) TRANSITION RULE FOR CURRENTLY APPROVED BENEFICIARIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 202 of the Immigration and
Nationality Act, as amended by this Act, immigrant visas under section 203(b
) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
allocated such that no alien described in subparagraph (B) receives a visa
later than the alien otherwise would have received said visa had this Act
not been enacted.
(B) ALIEN DESCRIBED.—An alien is described in this subparagraph if the
alien is the beneficiary of a petition for an immigrant visa under section
203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) that was
approved prior to the date of enactment of this Act.
In order to execute this clause, USCIS has to clear out the complete CHINA
EB2/EB3 backlog in the 3 year transition period. As a result, China gets
more quota in these 3 years than India if it is necessary to achieve this
goal.
That calculation of 85%x15% is wrong. 85% of 85% of unreserved quota is the
maximum number India gets, not the actual number they get.
All applicants with I-140 approved after the bill is passed will be frozen
indefinitely until China/India clear out the complete backlog.
unreserve的名额只在各国别内部必须按排期发,国家之间还要先按照 do no harm安排
名额,只要给印度比原来多一个就满足要求,但是必须给中国安排足够三年清空的名额
才能合法,任何三年之后还没清空的中国等待人都需要等比法案不通过要长的时间,就
不合法了。所以不需要增加总名额,同时对印度和中国有利,三年内对中国更有利。
(4) TRANSITION RULE FOR CURRENTLY APPROVED BENEFICIARIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 202 of the Immigration and
Nationality Act, as amended by this Act, immigrant visas under section 203(b
) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) shall be
allocated such that no alien described in subparagraph (B) receives a visa
later than the alien otherwise would have received said visa had this Act
not been enacted.
(B) ALIEN DESCRIBED.—An alien is described in this subparagraph if the
alien is the beneficiary of a petition for an immigrant visa under section
203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)) that was
approved prior to the date of enactment of this Act.
In order to execute this clause, USCIS has to clear out the complete CHINA
EB2/EB3 backlog in the 3 year transition period. As a result, China gets
more quota in these 3 years than India if it is necessary to achieve this
goal.
That calculation of 85%x15% is wrong. 85% of 85% of unreserved quota is the
maximum number India gets, not the actual number they get.
All applicants with I-140 approved after the bill is passed will be frozen
indefinitely until China/India clear out the complete backlog.
unreserve的名额只在各国别内部必须按排期发,国家之间还要先按照 do no harm安排
名额,只要给印度比原来多一个就满足要求,但是必须给中国安排足够三年清空的名额
才能合法,任何三年之后还没清空的中国等待人都需要等比法案不通过要长的时间,就
不合法了。所以不需要增加总名额,同时对印度和中国有利,三年内对中国更有利。