avatar
H*x
1
fico score一直说
我查了free report 上次late还是两年前啊
想知道到底是为啥
以前一直用的是citi
1) Number of accounts with delinquency
avatar
k*r
2
电脑小键盘显然是照抄计算器的布局,问题是,为啥当年计算器会选择这种布局?
avatar
d*n
3
这问题问的太牛了!坐沙发等解答。
avatar
l*a
4
我的问题是为什么一个从上往下,一个从下往上

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 电脑小键盘显然是照抄计算器的布局,问题是,为啥当年计算器会选择这种布局?
avatar
s*o
5
我觉得主要是用的最多的0要用大拇指(大一号),所以最好放左下角,其他数就按顺
序往上排了

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 电脑小键盘显然是照抄计算器的布局,问题是,为啥当年计算器会选择这种布局?
avatar
H*7
6
先问你会不会一只手输入数字吧
我估计楼主盲打都不会吧,打字还要眼看键盘一个个地掐
avatar
k*r
7
没看懂,你习惯了一个设定所以不能问问这个设定的初衷是什么?
好歹你说个0-1接近什么的理由也成啊。

【在 H******7 的大作中提到】
: 先问你会不会一只手输入数字吧
: 我估计楼主盲打都不会吧,打字还要眼看键盘一个个地掐

avatar
k*r
9
狗了一下,原来按键电话布局是在计算器布局出现后设定的,
有几个理论解释为啥按键电话布局如此。
It is pretty odd that a calculator and a touch-tone telephone have exactly
opposite layouts for their keypads, which have many identical components.
The reasons behind the differences are not known for certain, but a few
theories exist.
The first theory deals with the telephone's circuitry and tone-recognition
hardware. When the touch-tone telephone was being designed in the late 1950s
, the calculator and adding-machine designers had already established a
layout that had 7, 8 and 9 across the top row. Data-entry professionals, and
others who used calculators fairly regularly, were quite adept at
navigating these keypads. They could hit the numbers extremely quickly,
which was great for data entry, but not so great for dialing a touch-tone
phone. The tone-recognition technology could not operate effectively at the
speeds at which these specialists could dial the numbers. The telephone
designers figured that if they reversed the layout, the dialing speeds would
decrease and the tone-recognition would be able to do its job more reliably
. This theory has little proof to substantiate it, but it does make sense.
A second theory refers to a study done by Bell Labs in 1960. This study
involved testing several different telephone-keypad layouts to find out
which was easiest to master. After testing several layouts, including one
that used two rows with five numbers each and another that used a circular
positioning, it was determined that the three-by-three matrix that had 1, 2
and 3 across the top was the easiest for people to use.
Another theory is based on the layout of a rotary telephone. On a rotary
dial, 1 is at the top right and zero is on the bottom. When designing the
new touch-tone keypad, putting the 1 on the top-right didn't make much sense
, because Western writing is read from left to right. But putting 1 on the
top-left, and the subsequent numbers to the right, did make sense. Using
that formula, the resulting rows fell into place, with zero getting its own
row at the bottom.
All of these theories attempt to explain why telephone and calculator
keypads are exact opposites, yet no one theory can be pinpointed as the
definitive reason. It is common practice today to use the telephone-keypad
layout when designing new products that utilize a keypad, such as Automated
Teller Machines.
avatar
P*i
10
左边明明是电话

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 电脑小键盘显然是照抄计算器的布局,问题是,为啥当年计算器会选择这种布局?
avatar
k*r
11
....

【在 P****i 的大作中提到】
: 左边明明是电话
avatar
b*2
12
左边就是电话啊,还有重拨

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: ....
avatar
k*r
13
我又说左边是计算器么?
这个比较是问为啥电话-计算器(which 被电脑“照抄”)不一样,也许我的语文表达
能力太差了。

【在 b*****2 的大作中提到】
: 左边就是电话啊,还有重拨
avatar
b*2
14


【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 我又说左边是计算器么?
: 这个比较是问为啥电话-计算器(which 被电脑“照抄”)不一样,也许我的语文表达
: 能力太差了。

avatar
b*2
15
电话和计算器哪个出现得早?应该是计算器吧
avatar
k*r
16
计算器比按键电话早,有个回帖了解释了。

【在 b*****2 的大作中提到】
: 电话和计算器哪个出现得早?应该是计算器吧
avatar
H*g
17
左边是个不是电话吗?

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 电脑小键盘显然是照抄计算器的布局,问题是,为啥当年计算器会选择这种布局?
avatar
i*a
18
我以前在电讯公司做过BB机接线员,用数字键盘超熟

[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]

【在 H******7 的大作中提到】
: 先问你会不会一只手输入数字吧
: 我估计楼主盲打都不会吧,打字还要眼看键盘一个个地掐

avatar
o*1
19
我正在file a patent disclosurre. 有关穿戴电子产品的。具体地讲,十个指头,每
个指尖贴个传感器,分别代表0 - 9,两个大姆指齐上,代表小数点。我把话摞这儿,
我已经申请了,你们以后想用的,等着交专利费吧
avatar
H*g
20
我代表华强北的同僚感谢你

【在 o******1 的大作中提到】
: 我正在file a patent disclosurre. 有关穿戴电子产品的。具体地讲,十个指头,每
: 个指尖贴个传感器,分别代表0 - 9,两个大姆指齐上,代表小数点。我把话摞这儿,
: 我已经申请了,你们以后想用的,等着交专利费吧

avatar
t*t
21
还真没研究过

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 电脑小键盘显然是照抄计算器的布局,问题是,为啥当年计算器会选择这种布局?
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。