本来就是弱case一个，虽然使劲攒人品share review，但还是被RFE。大家给出出主意
，还不想卷铺盖。
Claim了一下3条，条条被RFE,不活了！
1. Judging the work of others:
The evidence you submitted is insufficient. You have provided evidence that
appears to meet the plain language of this criterion; however, the evidence
of record must still, in the aggregate, establish that the beneficiary is an
"alien of extraordinary ability."
审了五六十篇稿子，就是杂志（化学方面）影响因子最高才4.8两次，4.0四五次。不知
道是否这个原因觉得我没有extraordinary。
2.Original Contributions:
The evidence you submitted is insufficient. You have provided testimonial
evidence for this prong. While the evidence indicates that the beneficiary
has performed valuable research, the authors of the letters provided do not
sufficiently explain in concrete terms why and how the beneficiary's
contributions have been of major significance in the field.
只交了四封推荐信，一个美国某实验室主任，很大的牛；一个欧洲某实验室主任，也算
个牛人；一个原来待过的国家实验室division director；一个现在公司的VP。因为
publication record 弱，举例时不能指出具体的文章等等，所以的确感觉比较空洞。
也是这个原因没有claim scholarly articles。
3.Employment in a critical or essential capacity:
You have provided evidence that appears to meet the plain language of this
criterion; however, the evidence of record must still, in the aggregate,
establish that the beneficiary is an "alien of extraordinary ability."
我现在的职位相当于principle scientist,不知道强调"principle"有没有用；还有就
是会不会是觉得我现在的公司不够distinguished,就一个普通公司。主要用来support
的证据是我现在VP的letter讲我工作的重要性，以及原来国家实验室director说我当时
工作的重要性。
大家给出出主意吧！另外，RFE给的回复时间是2月底，但我现在身份2月初就过期了。
我能工作到2月底吗（假设最终还是被拒）？谢谢大家！
