avatar
还是东北哥们会玩# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
j*l
1
公司律师发来的其中一个supporting evidence是review这每问题,但是后面那段解释
让我有点迷糊,是不是现在只用邀请信和感谢信作为审稿证明已经不够了?感谢各位解
答。
Evidence of your participation as the judge of the work of others in the
same or an allied academic field.
"Please note that peer review is routine in the field and usually has
limited value in demonstrating your international recognition as outstanding
. Please provide documentation of the criteria for selection as a judge,
panelist, reviewer, etc. Please also provide documentary evidence to
establish how your participation is uncommon or otherwise noteworthy
relative to others who participate in similar activities."
avatar
q*2
3
意思是要editor的证明信,但是如果其他背景够强,是完全没必要的
avatar
l*i
4
这已经犯法了啊
avatar
P*I
5
请editor出个信函,信中需要出现他选你做reviewer的理由。例如:outstanding
researcher, international acclaims等关键字眼。这样比较有利于说明你做review不
是routine work是因为你的杰出成就
avatar
m*n
6
same red coat?
TaoBao has 同款?
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。