这样的生活是我们想要的吗？# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
s*l
1 楼
背景比较弱
生物统计
Paper 17
citation 240
5封推荐信（3封独立）
RFE by XM1307，质疑contribution，不知道是不是模版rfe或者杀手。
大部分citation都来自酱油文章，也没有亮点，感觉目前的推荐信和PL已经把可以挖的
挖过了。
Citation does not establish that this is record is widespread enough to be
consistent with the citation of the work of an individual who made original
contribution of major significance to the field as whole.
The support letter do not establish the petitioner has made contributions of
major significance to the entire （还把entire给加亮了） field. The provided
evidence failed to establish that the petitioner’s work has been widely
implemented in her field of endeavor as a whole.
In sum, while the petitioner has submitted objective documentary evidence of
the petitioner’s original contributions to the field, this evidence does
not establish the petition’s work has already had a significant impact on
the field.
Submit:
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary
’s contribution to the field
这个能提供些什么呢？
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work important
感觉和1要的是同一个东西
3. Testimony or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
可以再试图找推荐信，但是也不知道还能不能挖出新的亮点了
4. Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contributions has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field of has been widely cited
这个是指媒体报道吗？
5. Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence may include but is not limited to
a. Contract with companies using the beneficiary’s products
b. Licensed technology being used by others
c. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be Signiant to the field
没有应用和patent
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much details as
possible about the beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution was ‘original’ (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of “major” significant. General statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.
生物统计
Paper 17
citation 240
5封推荐信（3封独立）
RFE by XM1307，质疑contribution，不知道是不是模版rfe或者杀手。
大部分citation都来自酱油文章，也没有亮点，感觉目前的推荐信和PL已经把可以挖的
挖过了。
Citation does not establish that this is record is widespread enough to be
consistent with the citation of the work of an individual who made original
contribution of major significance to the field as whole.
The support letter do not establish the petitioner has made contributions of
major significance to the entire （还把entire给加亮了） field. The provided
evidence failed to establish that the petitioner’s work has been widely
implemented in her field of endeavor as a whole.
In sum, while the petitioner has submitted objective documentary evidence of
the petitioner’s original contributions to the field, this evidence does
not establish the petition’s work has already had a significant impact on
the field.
Submit:
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary
’s contribution to the field
这个能提供些什么呢？
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work important
感觉和1要的是同一个东西
3. Testimony or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
可以再试图找推荐信，但是也不知道还能不能挖出新的亮点了
4. Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contributions has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field of has been widely cited
这个是指媒体报道吗？
5. Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence may include but is not limited to
a. Contract with companies using the beneficiary’s products
b. Licensed technology being used by others
c. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be Signiant to the field
没有应用和patent
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much details as
possible about the beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution was ‘original’ (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of “major” significant. General statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.
