avatar
Hertz租到有问题的车# Law - 律师事务所
g*i
1
【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
发信人: cynosurewang (star), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Hertz租到有问题的车
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jul 9 17:39:28 2007)
我在salt lake city 飞机场 Hertz 租一辆midsize 车 开车在yellowstone,glacier
park, grand teton park 玩了7天。
发现车的main.req. 灯亮了。不知怎么回事,开起来没有问题,但心里没底,有点担心
车况。尤其还是带着我妈妈。
回到租车处,checkin,我要求Hertz 人员在我的receipt上签字说明车子的问题。
她写了:engin light on 并签了字。
我买了collosion damage waiver 保险。
请问这种情况是不是Hertz rent problematic car to customer。
可不可以要求索赔。
谢谢
avatar
c*d
2
The general principle of "no harm, no foul" probably applies here. If OP did
not suffer any damages, I don't see how he can successfully recover
anything from Hertz. Nominal/punitive are also unlikely.
avatar
g*i
3
agree. i don't think s/he can make a case in court.
the best thing is to file a complaint and very likely s/he
will get some sort of compensation (voucher?) from hertz for
his/her unhappy experience with their rental car.

did

【在 c**d 的大作中提到】
: The general principle of "no harm, no foul" probably applies here. If OP did
: not suffer any damages, I don't see how he can successfully recover
: anything from Hertz. Nominal/punitive are also unlikely.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。