对法律不熟悉不熟悉，求高人指教 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Law - 律师事务所

对法律不熟悉不熟悉，求高人指教

对法律不熟悉不熟悉，求高人指教# Law - 律师事务所

L*d2011-04-03 07:04

1 楼

用N卡9800 Pro半年了, 电视输出到一台老旧的Sony 53" 背投, 1080i格式(实际分辨率
是1728x1004) 用kmplayer之类的播放, 倒也相安无事, 直到最近想卡歌时才发现电视
输出总是搞不好. 记得上一个ATI的显卡用theater mode很轻松就搞定了. theater
mode就是不管你的视频是什么分辨率, 都自动给你保持高宽比全屏输出到电视. 这个
mode还有一个重要作用就是用powerpoint放幻灯, 投影仪那头给你自动全屏, 非常方便
上网一查, 震惊了, 原来N卡自8系列及以后就不支持full screen mirroring (也就是A
家的theater mode)! 据说的为了配合ms的什么版权控制.
现在的N卡多显示只有两个模式, 克隆或dualview. 克隆要求两个显示分辨率相同, 这
显然不适用于电视输出; 为什么我用dual view很用了半年了, 都是因为调节尺寸这工
作由播放器去做了, 虽然做到了, 但是常常需要手工调节. 结果这次碰到卡歌软件的电
视输出是固定尺寸800x600的, 输出到1080i上, 不能全屏,

s*t2011-04-03 07:04

2 楼

位于NW Portland的贸易物流公司诚聘以下人员：
1. 仓库管理员：熟练电脑操作，驾驶记录良好，工作效率高；
2. 产品采购专员：英文良好，沟通能力强，熟练电脑操作。
月薪$1500起,有意者请将简历以及联系方式发至：s*[email protected]

c*g2011-04-03 07:04

3 楼

上个月验血丙肝抗体阳性
出国之前验血阴性
中间没有打过针献血或者输血
也从未感觉有丙肝症状
请问是抗体测试false positive的可能性高吗
看了一些老外的论坛众说纷纭
多谢

s*r2011-04-03 07:04

4 楼

来美国5年乐，不知道要file 1040还是1040NR。如果file as resident，怎么claim
5000 treaty 和scholarship的treaty啊

p*e2011-04-03 07:04

5 楼

大赦年于1300年由Boniface八世设立，于之真诚悔过的朝圣者能得到“完全的赦免
”，借此洗去一切由罪而来的惩罚。然而1450年的大赦是里程碑性质的，因为自1300年
来罗马第一次有了常驻的教皇，且再没有对手的挑战。这一大赦年被视为教会重建统一
和平的标志。
它从1449年的开幕式起是一个巨大的成功。千万朝圣者涌进罗马，以致许多拿着棍
棒的志愿武装队在街头维持秩序。城里没有足够哦的床位应付每个人，上千人在野外和
葡萄园里营宿。教皇忙于应付无穷的的祝福需求，下令罗马所有的圣物——供奉彼得、
保罗的首吉的神龛，据说是维罗尼卡在苦路上为耶稣擦脸的手绢——都在每个周末为每
一波新朝圣者展出。无穷长队像洗牌一样进进出出直到夜深，最为结果，教皇规定朝圣
者的规定停留时间由八日缩短为三日。
大赦却有灾难的结果：夏季瘟疫开始盛行，坟地满场，尸体勾勒着圣路。瘟疫终于
过去，朝圣者又重聚而来，然而十二月十九日，大赦的最后一个星期，一只受惊的驴导
致人潮惊跑，他们穿过圣Angelo教堂各自狂奔回住处。在教堂里至少有200人被踩死或
者挤进河里淹死，附近的圣Celso教堂就做临时的

f*l2011-04-03 07:04

6 楼

苗头应该从很小就有。至少在小学五年级时，我身上就有这样的现象。那就是，我无法面对自己喜欢的人。无论这个喜欢的人是长辈，还是同辈。看到他们，我会本能的转过头。靠近他们十米，心跳的要掉出来。如果不幸非得和对方说话，简直会哭。
这样的情况在长大之后我以为会痊愈，但随着时间推移我发现，更严重了。甚至想到去看心理医生。
比如我喜欢木子美和葛巾，因为工作关系不得不和她们联络，得花很久时间做心理建设。我对她们说，对不起对不起，如果是我自己，永远都不会打扰你。因为很喜欢你呀，靠近了，就有可能被讨厌，但是不能不。说着自己就会小崩溃，这种态度大概也会给对方带来困扰，为什么让社交恐惧症的人来做与人打交道的工作呢？又是另一种抱歉了。
又比如几个前同事，我确实很喜欢她们。但总忍不住怀疑对方其实根本不喜欢我，甚至讨厌我。这种想法停不下来。以至于偶尔和她们说话，只要对方痛快的答应我，就觉得，天呀，怎么可能。
有时候一群人聚在一起吃饭，我不能容忍冷场。所以当出现冷场苗头时，我一定是站出来活跃气氛的那个。但是每次结束之后都异常后悔，觉得自己和小丑无异，为什么要说那些废话呢？
想了很久，症结可能就是这个：靠近了，有可能被讨厌，索性不靠近，默默看着。
更深的症结可能是：我不自信，觉得自己没有什么值得被喜欢的优点。所以处处在意，甚至是忖度别人的眼光。但是别人都那么忙，谁都在意你呢？你自己演了八台大戏，把自己累得要死，何必！

c*e2011-04-03 07:04

7 楼

namespace { int i; }
Which statement about the sample code above is true?
a) "i" has external linkage.
b) The code is equivalent to: static int i;.
c) "i" is visible to other compilation units.
d) "i" is only visible within the namespace.

O*52011-04-03 07:04

8 楼

如题

b*o2011-04-03 07:04

9 楼

新一季咨詢招聘又要截止了，诚恳的请教各位除了MBB外还有那些收PhD啊？

g*k2011-04-03 07:04

10 楼

Commonwealth v. Kenneth Waters
399 Mass. 708
Waters was arrested and charged with murder and robbery, tried and
convicted of both crimes. Evidence was based on crime scene photos, a
knife retrieved from trash, and witness statements.
Main focus is on Kenneth Waters’ appeal in court
Waters appealed charging that the trial judge committed 4 reversible
errors: voir dire, jury instructions, admission of evidence, and
denial of defense motions.
引用Lexis Nexis里的一段：
“The defendant argues that the judge erred in failing to instruct the
jury that intoxication may render a statement involuntary. The
defendant did not object to the judge's instructions, nor did he
request further instructions on this issue. Therefore, the standard of
review is whether the jury charge [*715] was so erroneous that it
created a 'substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice.’ ”
其他background info: Waters admitted to two former girlfriends Marsh
and Perry several weeks after murder incident occurred, Waters was
drunk, and stated that he had killed the “ …(referring to the victim)”
嫌看得太麻烦的：故事基本就是被告在喝醉后曾向女友承认杀了被害人，在女友证词和
各种证据
后，被判谋杀罪名成立，提起上诉，其中一项如下
Q: The judge failed to instruct the jury properly on voluntariness
A. What is the law on this issue?
B. Is it state law or federal?
C. What was the ruling of the court?
D. What was the reason given by the court for this ruling?
E. What case law (if any) did the court cite?
可能理解能力有限，对jury instruction 的A和B不清楚
不知道问题里的 “law on this issue” 是要解释law on voluntariness 还是on
failure to instruct jury。因为在voir dire里已经可以很清楚地解释
voluntariness, 不管是due process of the fifth还是commonwealth v. allen的
case law都不在考虑范围内。Due process要求有police involvement and
coercion, case law发生在这个案件之后而且不是retroactive.
如果是问law on failing to instruct jury，由于审理时被告没有提出反对，是不是
要针
对plain error standard of review来解释呢？还是具体解释substantial risk of
a miscarriage of justice？对这个不熟悉，求高人指教

B*s2011-04-03 07:04

11 楼

能在国内帮您工作吗？

L*D2011-04-03 07:04

12 楼

回在中医版。
http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article_t.php?board=ChineseMed&gid=12541983

【在 c********g 的大作中提到】

: 上个月验血丙肝抗体阳性
: 出国之前验血阴性
: 中间没有打过针献血或者输血
: 也从未感觉有丙肝症状
: 请问是抗体测试false positive的可能性高吗
: 看了一些老外的论坛众说纷纭
: 多谢

b*k2011-04-03 07:04

13 楼

看精华区
讲的很清楚
1040的话就在第21行

E*U2011-04-03 07:04

14 楼

b

【在 c**********e 的大作中提到】

: namespace { int i; }
: Which statement about the sample code above is true?
: a) "i" has external linkage.
: b) The code is equivalent to: static int i;.
: c) "i" is visible to other compilation units.
: d) "i" is only visible within the namespace.

c*32011-04-03 07:04

15 楼

总看到这类问题，呵呵。
想干啥都不晚，啥也不干年龄也是越来越老。朝闻道，夕死可矣。

b*y2011-04-03 07:04

16 楼

Delloit, AT Kearney, Accenture, LEK....

a*m2011-04-03 07:04

17 楼

不是高人，仅表达一下个人见解，切磋一下。
我觉得issue是What is the standard of review on appeal on jury instructions w
here the defendant failed to object to the judge's instructions of an issue
or to request further instructions on the issue at trial?
Court's holding -- SoR is clearly erroenous ("so erroneous that it created a
'substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice'")
Plain error SoR is standard while "substantial risk of a miscarriage of
justi
ce" is a test. You apply the test with reasoning process to explain whether
the standard is satisfied. If yes, then the trial court decision should be o
verruled.

【在 g****k 的大作中提到】

: Commonwealth v. Kenneth Waters
: 399 Mass. 708
: Waters was arrested and charged with murder and robbery, tried and
: convicted of both crimes. Evidence was based on crime scene photos, a
: knife retrieved from trash, and witness statements.
: Main focus is on Kenneth Waters’ appeal in court
: Waters appealed charging that the trial judge committed 4 reversible
: errors: voir dire, jury instructions, admission of evidence, and
: denial of defense motions.
: 引用Lexis Nexis里的一段：

l*h2011-04-03 07:04

18 楼

神医现身，大伙儿闪开点！

【在 L*D 的大作中提到】

: 回在中医版。
: http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article_t.php?board=ChineseMed&gid=12541983

c*e2011-04-03 07:04

19 楼

not right.

【在 E*U 的大作中提到】

: b

y*92011-04-03 07:04

20 楼

不晚

v*y2011-04-03 07:04

21 楼

cornerstone
NERA economic
CRA international...

【在 b****o 的大作中提到】

: 新一季咨詢招聘又要截止了，诚恳的请教各位除了MBB外还有那些收PhD啊？

g*k2011-04-03 07:04

22 楼

我也倾向于问的是SoR，不过另一个帖子里有人回复肯定说是问的voluntariness，因为
结果是已知的，不需要判断结果，主要是解释过程
这个case holding是已知的，接着引用下lexis nexis:
We have never stated that, in the circumstances
shown here, where there was no coercion and no police
involvement, the judge was required to submit the issue
of voluntariness to the jury. The defendant can derive no
support from language in Allen, supra, since we have
concluded that Allen will not be applied retroactively.
The defendant was helped rather than hurt by the judge's
decision to submit the issue of voluntariness to the jury.
Even assuming that the judge was required to submit the
issue of voluntariness to the jury, we conclude that there
was no substantial likelihood of a miscarriage of justice
from the fact that the judge did not specifically state in
his instructions that intoxication could render the
defendant's statements involuntary. Defense counsel
fully cross-examined the witnesses concerning the
defendant's state of mind when he made the statements,
and argued the issue in his closing argument. We
conclude that there is no substantial risk of a miscarriage
of justice.

t*n2011-04-03 07:04

23 楼

It only means you've been exposed to the virus.
Need the RNA test to determine whether you are infected.

【在 c********g 的大作中提到】

E*U2011-04-03 07:04

24 楼

a

【在 c**********e 的大作中提到】

: not right.

y*e2011-04-03 07:04

25 楼

不晚，我老公爸爸妈妈50多岁了还学了会计呢
拿了个会计证做账。。。嗯

【在 O*******5 的大作中提到】

: 如题

s*r2011-04-03 07:04

26 楼

1.Become a professor
2. do consulting using your own free time.

a*m2011-04-03 07:04

27 楼

It seems to me that voluntariness only becomes the issue when the current ca
se is reversed on appeal and the "intoxication may render a statement involu
ntary" makes its way in the jury instruction. Only then may the jury conside
r whether the statement is voluntary or not.
By the way, in real world, jurors may have well considered the fact that the
defendent was intoxicated when he made the statement of killing the victims
. I don't believe a jury would reach a different result by merely adding tha
t instruction.

【在 g****k 的大作中提到】

: 我也倾向于问的是SoR，不过另一个帖子里有人回复肯定说是问的voluntariness，因为
: 结果是已知的，不需要判断结果，主要是解释过程
: 这个case holding是已知的，接着引用下lexis nexis:
: We have never stated that, in the circumstances
: shown here, where there was no coercion and no police
: involvement, the judge was required to submit the issue
: of voluntariness to the jury. The defendant can derive no
: support from language in Allen, supra, since we have
: concluded that Allen will not be applied retroactively.
: The defendant was helped rather than hurt by the judge's

c*g2011-04-03 07:04

28 楼

可是我都没有机会接触到被感染的血液也有可能被感染过吗?

【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】

: It only means you've been exposed to the virus.
: Need the RNA test to determine whether you are infected.

r*t2011-04-03 07:04

29 楼

别逗了，本版成了 GRE 版了。。。

【在 E*U 的大作中提到】

: a

t*o2011-04-03 07:04

30 楼

不晚，放心去学吧。

w*e2011-04-03 07:04

31 楼

v姐是econ phd????

【在 v*******y 的大作中提到】

: cornerstone
: NERA economic
: CRA international...

g*k2011-04-03 07:04

32 楼

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/WaterWorld/794201.html
另一个版块有人这么回复的，看完又有点混乱了。
这个case实际是2010年一个电影"Conviction"的原型，不过电影讲的是被告的姐姐如何
帮被告洗脱罪名，最后由于DNA evidence被告宣判无罪。可惜和我要解释的被告上诉没
半点关系。
上诉结果和你的理论一样，even assuming judge had instruct jury that
intoxication may render a statement involuntary, result wouldn't be
different since defense counsel cross-examined witnesses and argued the
issue (whether intoxication render the statement involuntary) in closing
argument.
我想应该会从你建议的SoR的角度解释，多谢高人点拨，明后来更新后续^_^

c*g2011-04-03 07:04

33 楼

唯一的可能的是验血之前一个月去看过牙医和一个星期前去去纹身
我查过一些资料丙肝抗体要三个时间才能形成所以不应该因为那两次吧?

【在 t*******n 的大作中提到】

: It only means you've been exposed to the virus.
: Need the RNA test to determine whether you are infected.

d*p2011-04-03 07:04

34 楼

I think he is right.

【在 c**********e 的大作中提到】

: not right.

m*72011-04-03 07:04

35 楼

不晚，但是可能会遇到很多的问题和困难，不管是physical还是psycological，要做好
准备

a*m2011-04-03 07:04

36 楼

Conviction我也看过。那个case实在太exceptional了

【在 g****k 的大作中提到】

: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/WaterWorld/794201.html
: 另一个版块有人这么回复的，看完又有点混乱了。
: 这个case实际是2010年一个电影"Conviction"的原型，不过电影讲的是被告的姐姐如何
: 帮被告洗脱罪名，最后由于DNA evidence被告宣判无罪。可惜和我要解释的被告上诉没
: 半点关系。
: 上诉结果和你的理论一样，even assuming judge had instruct jury that
: intoxication may render a statement involuntary, result wouldn't be
: different since defense counsel cross-examined witnesses and argued the
: issue (whether intoxication render the statement involuntary) in closing
: argument.

g*j2011-04-03 07:04

37 楼

The specificity of HCV antibody testing is >99%. However, the positive
predictive value of a positive result depends on your prediagnosis
prediction. This is a very intriguing epidemiological concept. Put it in a
practical way, if you are at low risk for infection, even a positive
screening test with a great specificity can be suspicious. In other words,
you should call your doctor and ask for a retest as well as RNA titer
determination, which you will need for your treatment anyway.

E*U2011-04-03 07:04

38 楼

en. I am puzzled
Internal linkage
The following kinds of identifiers have internal linkage:
* Objects, references, or functions explicitly declared static
* Objects or references declared in namespace scope (or global scope in
C) with the specifier const and neither explicitly declared extern, nor
previously declared to have external linkage
* Data members of an anonymous union
* C++ Function templates explicitly declared static
* C++ Identifiers declared in the unnamed names

【在 d****p 的大作中提到】

: I think he is right.

O*52011-04-03 07:04

39 楼

毕业后都快40岁了,会不会找工作别人看年纪太大,不要?

E*U2011-04-03 07:04

40 楼

from another place
Note that using static for internal linkage is deprecated since it can't be
used on classes and you should use anonymous namespaces which although they
have external linkage are unreachable from other translation units.

in

【在 E*U 的大作中提到】

: en. I am puzzled
: Internal linkage
: The following kinds of identifiers have internal linkage:
: * Objects, references, or functions explicitly declared static
: * Objects or references declared in namespace scope (or global scope in
: C) with the specifier const and neither explicitly declared extern, nor
: previously declared to have external linkage
: * Data members of an anonymous union
: * C++ Function templates explicitly declared static
: * C++ Identifiers declared in the unnamed names

Y*y2011-04-03 07:04

41 楼

Nope. Just give a try....

I*y2011-04-03 07:04

42 楼

agree. b should be the answer.

【在 d****p 的大作中提到】

: I think he is right.

b*32011-04-03 07:04

43 楼

毕业后都快40岁了,会不会找工作别人看年纪太大,不要?

k*d2011-04-03 07:04

44 楼

经测试b是正确的
#include
namespace {int i;}
void f(){i++;
std::cout<}
int main(){
f();
i++;
std::cout<}
输出结果为
i in f:1
in in main:2

s*i2011-04-03 07:04

45 楼

美国找工作,没人会问你年纪多大...如果回国的话,就是another story了......

s*e2011-04-03 07:04

46 楼

你这个代码只能证明D不对。你还需要另外一个cpp文件。

【在 k*******d 的大作中提到】

: 经测试b是正确的
: #include
: namespace {int i;}
: void f(){i++;
: std::cout<: }
: int main(){
: f();
: i++;
: std::cout<

a*o2011-04-03 07:04

47 楼

晚
会计要有工作经验才吃香

w*g2011-04-03 07:04

48 楼

B.
reference: C++ primer plus

g*i2011-04-03 07:04

49 楼

不晚,2年就读完了.

X*r2011-04-03 07:04

50 楼

Where is this list come from? Reference?

in

【在 E*U 的大作中提到】

f*d2011-04-03 07:04

51 楼

LZ还有其他选择吗？
从工作上来说，有三个业：就业、职业和事业。
中国人在这边，能解决前两个就可以了。
会计是我所知道的能比较好解决这个问题的选择。
年龄不用考虑，如果你学别的也一样。
有人建议什么是你的“老”龄，就是你将你的年龄加15岁。所以，LZ50岁学会计可能才
是“老”，而对50岁的人说，75岁才是老。

c*e2011-04-03 07:04

52 楼

Thank you guys for the discussion. evu and decamp are right, based on the
given answer. Testing is a good way for exploration. But some times (like this example) it does not tell the correct answer. Sometimes, testing is not exhaustive. In a compiling system I use, sometimes it gives results inconsistent to the Standard.
This question is intended to illustrate the use of anonymous namespaces.
Here, the wrong answers have as much exposition value as the correct answer.

a） "i" has external link