请教一个准备LSAT的问题 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Law - 律师事务所

请教一个准备LSAT的问题

请教一个准备LSAT的问题# Law - 律师事务所

N*B2011-10-14 07:10

1 楼

现在还在打广告，要是公司被收购了，要从新打广告来过么？
谁有经验，指点一下，有包子酬谢
谢谢

r*e2011-10-14 07:10

2 楼

I*e2011-10-14 07:10

3 楼

咱们这儿的人都做啥的? 飞盘MM好象是做金融的. songp是上学的.天蓝MM做啥的?
lovesea MM 我来猜猜, 是文艺青年?

D*42011-10-14 07:10

4 楼

Which allocator member function do standard containers use to acquire
storage for their elements in C++?
A. std::allocator<>::make(size_t)
B. std::allocator<>::new(size_t)
C. std::allocator<>::malloc(int)
D. std::allocator<>::allocate(size_t)
E. std::allocator<>::acquire(size_t)
我只知道D，allocate是allocator 的member function.
多谢

w*y2011-10-14 07:10

5 楼

计划用4~6个月准备LSAT。两种途径：
1）LG,LR,RC 参考资料同步复习，然后集中做PT
2）根据自己强弱或兴趣，按月分别攻克LG/LR/RC复习资料，然后集中做PT
这两种途径我都会习惯，请问哪一种会更加EFFICIENT?

N*B2011-10-14 07:10

6 楼

t*g2011-10-14 07:10

7 楼

so so

S*p2011-10-14 07:10

8 楼

报自己先

X*r2011-10-14 07:10

9 楼

这些纯知识性的问题随便查一下标准就知道了。
见20.4.1 [lib.default.allocator]

【在 D******4 的大作中提到】

: Which allocator member function do standard containers use to acquire
: storage for their elements in C++?
: A. std::allocator<>::make(size_t)
: B. std::allocator<>::new(size_t)
: C. std::allocator<>::malloc(int)
: D. std::allocator<>::allocate(size_t)
: E. std::allocator<>::acquire(size_t)
: 我只知道D，allocate是allocator 的member function.
: 多谢

I*y2011-10-14 07:10

10 楼

read LGB, LRB, and manhattan RC books first, do some PTs untimed, then drill
your weakest, followed by seriously timed PT.

【在 w*****y 的大作中提到】

: 计划用4~6个月准备LSAT。两种途径：
: 1）LG,LR,RC 参考资料同步复习，然后集中做PT
: 2）根据自己强弱或兴趣，按月分别攻克LG/LR/RC复习资料，然后集中做PT
: 这两种途径我都会习惯，请问哪一种会更加EFFICIENT?

l*r2011-10-14 07:10

11 楼

看公司的税号变不变。

b*g2011-10-14 07:10

12 楼

优美。

I*e2011-10-14 07:10

13 楼

我..民工

D*42011-10-14 07:10

14 楼

实在不好意思啊学习c++不久，不知道如何查找标准
多谢了哈~

【在 X****r 的大作中提到】

: 这些纯知识性的问题随便查一下标准就知道了。
: 见20.4.1 [lib.default.allocator]

w*y2011-10-14 07:10

15 楼

Thanks for replying.
I probably didn't make it clear. My question is: Should I do LGB,LRB, RC
simultaneously for every day/month, OR LGB 1st month, then LRB 2nd month,
then RC 3rd month? Which way is better/more efficient? Thanks!

drill

【在 I*****y 的大作中提到】

: read LGB, LRB, and manhattan RC books first, do some PTs untimed, then drill
: your weakest, followed by seriously timed PT.

j*e2011-10-14 07:10

16 楼

挺美的

【在 r*********e 的大作中提到】

s*02011-10-14 07:10

17 楼

我专攻 siebel

【在 I********e 的大作中提到】

: 咱们这儿的人都做啥的? 飞盘MM好象是做金融的. songp是上学的.天蓝MM做啥的?
: lovesea MM 我来猜猜, 是文艺青年?

w*y2011-10-14 07:10

18 楼

s*02011-10-14 07:10

19 楼

IT ?

【在 I********e 的大作中提到】

: 我..民工

I*y2011-10-14 07:10

20 楼

read LGB, LRB, and manhattan RC books first, do some PTs untimed, then drill
your weakest, followed by seriously timed PT.

【在 w*****y 的大作中提到】

l*r2011-10-14 07:10

21 楼

Siebel, originally Flugzeugbau Halle, was a German aircraft manufacturer in
Halle an der Saale.
The Siebel Scholars program was established by the Siebel Foundation in
2000 to recognize the most talented students at the world’s leading
graduate schools of business, computer science, and bioengineering.

【在 s******0 的大作中提到】

: 我专攻 siebel

w*y2011-10-14 07:10

22 楼

: read LGB, LRB, and manhattan RC books first, do some PTs untimed, then drill
: your weakest, followed by seriously timed PT.

s*02011-10-14 07:10

23 楼

LOL ... really? that surely sounds much more complicated than what I thought ... my siebel is a dumb CRM product, which merged by Oracle couple of years ago.
how about you? 牛筋 ...

in

【在 l*r 的大作中提到】

: Siebel, originally Flugzeugbau Halle, was a German aircraft manufacturer in
: Halle an der Saale.
: The Siebel Scholars program was established by the Siebel Foundation in
: 2000 to recognize the most talented students at the world’s leading
: graduate schools of business, computer science, and bioengineering.

D*72011-10-14 07:10

24 楼

我觉得还是三个部分同时准备比较好呵呵因为总单独做一个比较枯燥而且到最后没有
题感啦
Game比较简单 RC需要积累可以先从LR开始到最后速度是最重要的：）

【在 w*****y 的大作中提到】

: Thanks for replying.
: I probably didn't make it clear. My question is: Should I do LGB,LRB, RC
: simultaneously for every day/month, OR LGB 1st month, then LRB 2nd month,
: then RC 3rd month? Which way is better/more efficient? Thanks!
:
: drill

l*r2011-10-14 07:10

25 楼

我？工科wsn，哈哈

thought ... my siebel is a dumb CRM product, which merged by Oracle couple
of years ago.

【在 s******0 的大作中提到】

: LOL ... really? that surely sounds much more complicated than what I thought ... my siebel is a dumb CRM product, which merged by Oracle couple of years ago.
: how about you? 牛筋 ...
:
: in