Redian新闻
>
有必要买homeowner's title insurance么
avatar
有必要买homeowner's title insurance么# Living
b*d
1
等巴马签字,就可以生效了.
avatar
a*a
2
有谁还有没用完的卡吗?2分钟就行,打进去问个事情。
谢谢
站内。
avatar
w*b
3
there are two title insurance, one is covering the loan amount, required by
the lender,another one is covering the whole value of the house for the
owner, not required
现在律师问我们要不要保第二个title insurance. 他说可能系统出错啊,前owner
claim title啥的,可能我们就会丢了房子,建议买。
这个有两个plan,
homeowner's policy $670, additional coverage to the market value
owner's policy $450, cover the purchasing price
大家都买这个保险了么? 到底有没有必要啊
我们就一个前任房主,是韩国人,已经回韩国了。
avatar
s*y
4
完了,这么说来,Sequester真的是免不了了

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 等巴马签字,就可以生效了.
avatar
t*s
5
Yours is cheap. Mine is much more expensive.
Anyway I bought it.
avatar
b*d
6
今年是肯定了.现在就是看后9年.如果不把它去掉,明年要在今年的基础上再减一次.

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 完了,这么说来,Sequester真的是免不了了
avatar
x*g
7
买,也不贵。

by

【在 w*********b 的大作中提到】
: there are two title insurance, one is covering the loan amount, required by
: the lender,another one is covering the whole value of the house for the
: owner, not required
: 现在律师问我们要不要保第二个title insurance. 他说可能系统出错啊,前owner
: claim title啥的,可能我们就会丢了房子,建议买。
: 这个有两个plan,
: homeowner's policy $670, additional coverage to the market value
: owner's policy $450, cover the purchasing price
: 大家都买这个保险了么? 到底有没有必要啊
: 我们就一个前任房主,是韩国人,已经回韩国了。

avatar
s*y
8
不会吧!!!!!真的这样的话,一大批实验室必定关门无疑!

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 今年是肯定了.现在就是看后9年.如果不把它去掉,明年要在今年的基础上再减一次.
avatar
w*b
9
也不便宜啊。 关键是想知道到底有没有必要。为啥系统出错啥的就能危及到我的title
呢?

【在 x********g 的大作中提到】
: 买,也不贵。
:
: by

avatar
b*d
10
Discretionary spending outlays will be reduced from $1,285.3 billion in 2012
to $1,213.9 billion in 2013, a reduction of $71.4 billion or 5.6%.
Discretionary spending will fall again to $1,170.0 billion in 2014, a
decrease of $42.8 billion or 3.6%.
Discretionary spending will rise gradually from $1,170.0 in 2014 to $1,423.8
billion by 2023, an annual growth rate of 2.2% during the 2014 to 2023
period and 0.9% for the 2012-2023 period. The 2.2% growth rate approximates
CBO's projected rate of inflation and is well below the annual spending
growth rate of 6.3% from 2000 to 2012.

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 不会吧!!!!!真的这样的话,一大批实验室必定关门无疑!
avatar
w*b
11
也不便宜啊。 关键是想知道到底有没有必要。为啥系统出错啥的就能危及到我的title
呢?

【在 x********g 的大作中提到】
: 买,也不贵。
:
: by

avatar
L*s
12
挺好,都回国海龟去。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 不会吧!!!!!真的这样的话,一大批实验室必定关门无疑!
avatar
L*1
13
We only have one, which covers both.
Find out what's covered in the first one. Is is the original load amount or
remaining loan amount? If original, probably you can get by without the
second (optional) one.
The reason for title insurance is that if somebody claims an interest on
your property, you do not loss anything. Anything can happen, although those
chances are remote. It would be safe not to buy title insurance in most
cases, just like health insurance.
avatar
s*y
14
这么说就是看谁命硬能挺过2015了。

2012
.8
approximates

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: Discretionary spending outlays will be reduced from $1,285.3 billion in 2012
: to $1,213.9 billion in 2013, a reduction of $71.4 billion or 5.6%.
: Discretionary spending will fall again to $1,170.0 billion in 2014, a
: decrease of $42.8 billion or 3.6%.
: Discretionary spending will rise gradually from $1,170.0 in 2014 to $1,423.8
: billion by 2023, an annual growth rate of 2.2% during the 2014 to 2023
: period and 0.9% for the 2012-2023 period. The 2.2% growth rate approximates
: CBO's projected rate of inflation and is well below the annual spending
: growth rate of 6.3% from 2000 to 2012.

avatar
s*e
15
我要回老家卖红薯了。
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。