帮忙看看我的GFE，# Living
m*k
1 楼
这一轮评审下来分数不理想，但评审意见倒不算太严厉，准备改后再投。约了跟PO打电
话，因为是第一次打这种resubmit之前的电话，请教一下问些什么比较好？
话，因为是第一次打这种resubmit之前的电话，请教一下问些什么比较好？
c*r
2 楼
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Warta (Niu) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:34:20 2011, 美东) 提到:
You got it wrong. What the immigration officer wrote means ND (receipt
notice date), not RD (Received date). So it means they are proceccing
according to Notice Date on your I-485. Many people may have July 2, 2007 as
RD, but different ND (from July to September).
.
are
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
suiyi (随意) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:36:15 2011, 美东) 提到:
原来是根据notice date, no wonder I haven't received any update. my notice
date is pretty late.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:39:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
RD (or Filing Date - sometimes they use two terms interchangeably). Notice
date is totally different.
Your RD should be 7/29/07 if this is the date that they received your app -
this can be verified through infopass or USCIS help line.
since
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:50:59 2011, 美东) 提到:
You misunderstood RD. RD is called receipt date. Once your application
arrives USCIS, they will stamp it with a date, that is called Receipt Date.
The notice date, is totally different，it's the date when USCIS send you a
letter telling you that they've received your app. It's has been a rule to
use RD for USCIS once current.
as
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
llabell (凉凉) 于 (Wed Jul 13 15:09:08 2011, 美东) 提到:
这样不是很混乱吗？差不多的RD，比如07大潮的，pd差很远很远。排期是按pd的，以周
为单位前进（1，8，15，22），那么移民局的材料总得以pd分类才合理吧，一周的放一
块儿。这个月有5个月的人current了，把这5个月的文件找出来，再按rd排一遍吗？还
是其实不用实际文件，只在电脑里看就可以了。那样的话更可以严格按照一个顺序了，
怎么能像他们现在这么乱呢。
.
are
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Wed Jul 13 15:17:03 2011, 美东) 提到:
你讲的没错，其实是就是挺乱的，但用RD有其历史原因。就像现在订的那个7% country
limit一样。所以你可以看到RD的原则并不是严格照办的。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
llabell (凉凉) 于 (Wed Jul 13 15:45:18 2011, 美东) 提到:
唉，他们有个顺序好歹比什么顺序都没有好。不想那么多了，我还是安心慢慢等着吧。
country
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
blackpool (blackpool) 于 (Wed Jul 13 17:29:25 2011, 美东) 提到:
马的，老子的ND是10月15号，RD是8月9号。还有比我晚的吗？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wzxt (wzxt) 于 (Wed Jul 13 17:44:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
Rd 也不是绝对的。对同一堆可能。但是有很多移民官在同是工作。如果没人一堆，就
狠难保持顺序了。
country
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
lisp (huahuaer) 于 (Wed Jul 13 22:03:52 2011, 美东) 提到:
patpat。我的RD是9月底的，本来7月就寄到了NSC，结果给转到CSC处理了。
估计没有比我的RD晚的了。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Thu Jul 14 12:20:09 2011, 美东) 提到:
我老就关于RD，还是ND的问题刚才又电话问询了一下上次的官员，结果如下：
1) RD (Receipt Date) <> ND （Notice Date)
2) Why RD is selected not PD or other Ds?
The reason is so obvious - for any categories that have enough visa
availibility, USCIS processes petitions based on first come first serve. In
analogue to use PERM filing date as PD, the only criterion employed here is
the date when an application is filed, namely the date when USCIS receives
your application. ND aka Notice Date, which might be something coined by
immigration forums, is not trackable in USCIS system.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Thu Jul 14 12:36:46 2011, 美东) 提到:
From the attached screenshot, you may see immediately that the Filing Date (
or RD) is so important in your I485 adjudication process - even more than PD.
-
Warta (Niu) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:34:20 2011, 美东) 提到:
You got it wrong. What the immigration officer wrote means ND (receipt
notice date), not RD (Received date). So it means they are proceccing
according to Notice Date on your I-485. Many people may have July 2, 2007 as
RD, but different ND (from July to September).
.
are
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
suiyi (随意) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:36:15 2011, 美东) 提到:
原来是根据notice date, no wonder I haven't received any update. my notice
date is pretty late.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:39:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
RD (or Filing Date - sometimes they use two terms interchangeably). Notice
date is totally different.
Your RD should be 7/29/07 if this is the date that they received your app -
this can be verified through infopass or USCIS help line.
since
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Wed Jul 13 14:50:59 2011, 美东) 提到:
You misunderstood RD. RD is called receipt date. Once your application
arrives USCIS, they will stamp it with a date, that is called Receipt Date.
The notice date, is totally different，it's the date when USCIS send you a
letter telling you that they've received your app. It's has been a rule to
use RD for USCIS once current.
as
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
llabell (凉凉) 于 (Wed Jul 13 15:09:08 2011, 美东) 提到:
这样不是很混乱吗？差不多的RD，比如07大潮的，pd差很远很远。排期是按pd的，以周
为单位前进（1，8，15，22），那么移民局的材料总得以pd分类才合理吧，一周的放一
块儿。这个月有5个月的人current了，把这5个月的文件找出来，再按rd排一遍吗？还
是其实不用实际文件，只在电脑里看就可以了。那样的话更可以严格按照一个顺序了，
怎么能像他们现在这么乱呢。
.
are
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Wed Jul 13 15:17:03 2011, 美东) 提到:
你讲的没错，其实是就是挺乱的，但用RD有其历史原因。就像现在订的那个7% country
limit一样。所以你可以看到RD的原则并不是严格照办的。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
llabell (凉凉) 于 (Wed Jul 13 15:45:18 2011, 美东) 提到:
唉，他们有个顺序好歹比什么顺序都没有好。不想那么多了，我还是安心慢慢等着吧。
country
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
blackpool (blackpool) 于 (Wed Jul 13 17:29:25 2011, 美东) 提到:
马的，老子的ND是10月15号，RD是8月9号。还有比我晚的吗？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wzxt (wzxt) 于 (Wed Jul 13 17:44:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
Rd 也不是绝对的。对同一堆可能。但是有很多移民官在同是工作。如果没人一堆，就
狠难保持顺序了。
country
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
lisp (huahuaer) 于 (Wed Jul 13 22:03:52 2011, 美东) 提到:
patpat。我的RD是9月底的，本来7月就寄到了NSC，结果给转到CSC处理了。
估计没有比我的RD晚的了。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Thu Jul 14 12:20:09 2011, 美东) 提到:
我老就关于RD，还是ND的问题刚才又电话问询了一下上次的官员，结果如下：
1) RD (Receipt Date) <> ND （Notice Date)
2) Why RD is selected not PD or other Ds?
The reason is so obvious - for any categories that have enough visa
availibility, USCIS processes petitions based on first come first serve. In
analogue to use PERM filing date as PD, the only criterion employed here is
the date when an application is filed, namely the date when USCIS receives
your application. ND aka Notice Date, which might be something coined by
immigration forums, is not trackable in USCIS system.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Ranier (歪里歪里海批) 于 (Thu Jul 14 12:36:46 2011, 美东) 提到:
From the attached screenshot, you may see immediately that the Filing Date (
or RD) is so important in your I485 adjudication process - even more than PD.
-
c*d
3 楼
贷26万，30年。no point， 5.125.
A:
Origination Charge: 4088.59
Origination Charge Credit: -5546.25
Total Origination Charge: -1457.30
B:
Flood Fee/Credit Report/Tax Service Fee: 12/20/60
Appraisal: 445
Title services and lender title insurance: 1131.44
Owner's title insurance: 1110.20
Government recording charge: 60
Initial deposit for your escrow account: 2587.86
Home owner's insurance: 546
Total Settlement charge: A + B = 4626.68
那个lender title insurance 是什麽？要我们出吗？谢谢
A:
Origination Charge: 4088.59
Origination Charge Credit: -5546.25
Total Origination Charge: -1457.30
B:
Flood Fee/Credit Report/Tax Service Fee: 12/20/60
Appraisal: 445
Title services and lender title insurance: 1131.44
Owner's title insurance: 1110.20
Government recording charge: 60
Initial deposit for your escrow account: 2587.86
Home owner's insurance: 546
Total Settlement charge: A + B = 4626.68
那个lender title insurance 是什麽？要我们出吗？谢谢
t*s
4 楼
very nice deal
t*s
5 楼
相关阅读
rain gutter大家是找人安装，还是自己安装的？如何处理宠物留下的（可能）问题，FLEA等万能的家版给出个主意吧。。。给空调压缩机装了hard start kit银行主动降价10K，怎么回事呢？现在都以发流氓帖子为荣了？这种电线杆是不是高压线？有没有人跟我一样，不能坐软沙发，不能睡床垫Weed and feed 以后，部分好草也变黄了。LOCAL有套沙发，$400 如何？全家所有马桶储水缸底部渗水讲个老莫的故事（2）hand job 上瘾怎么办？求推荐新泽西中部大普林斯顿地区的买房经纪讲个地形的故事（2）如果Loan Broker lock了rate，最后不能close,对broker有啥影响地板是深色的沙发应该用什么样子的好？55的电视买个什么样的STAND呢【紧急求助】 暴雨，地下室里水排不出去了割草机熄火