問新澤西的人一個問題# Living
b*r
1 楼
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
m31 (中英文不限) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:12:30 2011, 美东) 提到:
作为PI拿过NASA几十万的GRANT，很想算成是AWARD，但看板上的意思是不是只能当作
CONTRIBUTION啊？多谢！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
powerbait (Jigking) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:25:28 2011, 美东) 提到:
如果已经符合三条了，建议不要Claim Award。放在Contribution和Final Merit，这个
能证明你TOP。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
m31 (中英文不限) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:32:38 2011, 美东) 提到:
谢谢回复。我的REVIEW很弱，不到十次，所以想试试。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
brighttiger (hehehehe) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:38:00 2011, 美东) 提到:
it is not a bad idea if you can share your major here. Those who already
passed I140 may refer you for the review if they are still receiving review
invitations.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
powerbait (Jigking) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:38:47 2011, 美东) 提到:
我理解次数不是主要的，有Invitation+Thank You Letter就该算。Journal的IP，Rank
， International 等更重要。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
powerbait (Jigking) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:49:05 2011, 美东) 提到:
USCIS 如何判定Award：
The criteria used to grant the awards or prizes;
The national or international significance of the awards or prizes in the
field; and
The number of awardees or prize recipients as well as any limitations on
competitors (an award limited to competitors from a single institution, for
example, may have little national or international significance).
关于Reviewer：
The petitioner must show that the alien has not only been invited to judge
the work of others, but also that the alien actually participated in the
judging of the work of others in the same or allied field of specialization.
For example:
Peer reviewing for a scholarly journal, as evidenced by a request from the
journal to the alien to do the review, accompanied by proof that the review
was actually completed.
Serving as a member of a Ph.D. dissertation committee that makes the final
judgment as to whether an individual candidate’s body of work satisfies the
requirements for a doctoral degree, as evidenced by departmental records.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
m31 (中英文不限) 于 (Sun Mar 27 22:04:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
Thanks a lot for the suggestion. My major is astrophysics, so quite 冷门 ：
）Would be great to be recommended for more reviews (high energy physics etc
.).
review
m31 (中英文不限) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:12:30 2011, 美东) 提到:
作为PI拿过NASA几十万的GRANT，很想算成是AWARD，但看板上的意思是不是只能当作
CONTRIBUTION啊？多谢！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
powerbait (Jigking) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:25:28 2011, 美东) 提到:
如果已经符合三条了，建议不要Claim Award。放在Contribution和Final Merit，这个
能证明你TOP。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
m31 (中英文不限) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:32:38 2011, 美东) 提到:
谢谢回复。我的REVIEW很弱，不到十次，所以想试试。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
brighttiger (hehehehe) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:38:00 2011, 美东) 提到:
it is not a bad idea if you can share your major here. Those who already
passed I140 may refer you for the review if they are still receiving review
invitations.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
powerbait (Jigking) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:38:47 2011, 美东) 提到:
我理解次数不是主要的，有Invitation+Thank You Letter就该算。Journal的IP，Rank
， International 等更重要。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
powerbait (Jigking) 于 (Sun Mar 27 21:49:05 2011, 美东) 提到:
USCIS 如何判定Award：
The criteria used to grant the awards or prizes;
The national or international significance of the awards or prizes in the
field; and
The number of awardees or prize recipients as well as any limitations on
competitors (an award limited to competitors from a single institution, for
example, may have little national or international significance).
关于Reviewer：
The petitioner must show that the alien has not only been invited to judge
the work of others, but also that the alien actually participated in the
judging of the work of others in the same or allied field of specialization.
For example:
Peer reviewing for a scholarly journal, as evidenced by a request from the
journal to the alien to do the review, accompanied by proof that the review
was actually completed.
Serving as a member of a Ph.D. dissertation committee that makes the final
judgment as to whether an individual candidate’s body of work satisfies the
requirements for a doctoral degree, as evidenced by departmental records.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
m31 (中英文不限) 于 (Sun Mar 27 22:04:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
Thanks a lot for the suggestion. My major is astrophysics, so quite 冷门 ：
）Would be great to be recommended for more reviews (high energy physics etc
.).
review
