n小时没上来。# Memory - 如烟网事
p*e
1 楼
现在拿336的耳放端作为前级输出，觉得还可以
耳放和前级是不是仅仅就一个接口的区别？
我也可以考虑买个前级，然后转接耳机，到底哪个可以包含另外一个？
耳放和前级是不是仅仅就一个接口的区别？
我也可以考虑买个前级，然后转接耳机，到底哪个可以包含另外一个？
w*s
2 楼
Open Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama & The National Prevention,
Health Promotion, and Public Health Council
By Catherine J. Frompovich | September 21st, 2010
(An Open Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama & The National Prevention,
Health Promotion, and Public Health Council As created under Executive
Order 13544 of June 10, 2010)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Since voters, consumers, and taxpayers have NO input nor any ability to
accept, reject, or counter FORCED legislation as enacted by Presidential
Executive Orders—nor does Congress have any authority over
them, which I find absolutely counter to a democratic form of governance
226;€”I think it behooves us all to examine Presidential Executive
Order 13544 in view of what it may and can portend for We, the People.
There are many interpretations that Obama “gave away the store” with
regard to the USA accepting Codex Alimentarius, that draconian One-World
edict regarding the U.S. food supply. One thing that puzzles this writer is
how the U.S. FDA and USDA can stand for relinquishing its supposed oversight
of the U.S. food supply to someone else, unless, of course, they are in
cahoots with Codex and plan to implement Codex, which seems like the only
logical scenario since we don’t hear these agencies protesting their
usurpation.
Although Codex Alimentarius is mentioned nowhere in E.O. 13544, one has to
wonder while reading it, if it is mentioned “between the lines.” The other
One-World player, the World Health Organization (WHO), also is not
mentioned but, again, its ephemeral fingerprints seem to be all over 13544.
It’s a well-known “secret” that WHO and Codex are not consumer-friendly
about much that has to do with vitamin and mineral supplementation,
homeopathy, complementary alternative medicine (CAM), and a ‘chemical-free
’ lifestyle.
In the United States, approximately 38 percent of adults (about 4 in 10) and
approximately 12 percent of children (about 1 in 9) are using some form of
CAM.[1]
Reading Sec. 3(a) of E.O. 13544 every U.S. healthcare consumer must realize
that there’s the real potential for WHO and its directives to be ‘calling
the shots’—literally and figuratively—in the
USA regarding healthcare, as it did with its erroneous pandemic of 2009 that
did NOT pan out; cost jillions of dollars for hastily manufactured and
basically a two-week-testing period of H1N1 flu vaccines that numerous
people rejected and resulted in surpluses being destroyed, which
coincidentally resulted in lower-than-ever death rates from seasonal flu.
Consequently the CDC went back to the drawing board and revised those
statistics lower. See CDC Revises Death Estimates from Flu http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=119215
Still referring to Sec. 3(a), healthcare consumers need to ask, “Is
complementary alternative medicine (CAM) included under integrative health
care in the United States,” and if not, why not?
Moving along to Sec. 3 (b) one gets the “willies” here because this is
where the ‘sacred cow’ of medicine, media, pharmaceutical companies, and
public health systems—vaccines and forced vaccinationsâ
8364;”can and probably will be implemented. But this also is where informed
consent and right to self-determination can be denied and over-ridden under
the guise of the One-World philosophy that the “herd” counts more than
the individual, when in reality the herd is being hoodwinked because of mis-
information being divulged on purpose regarding vaccines. Here’s a case in
point.
Numerous vaccines are produced using aborted fetus cells called diploid
cells. Reading a vaccine package insert, one would not equate diploid cells
with aborted babies, but that’s what it is. So, one disturbing question
this writer has to ask is: Where is the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops and the Roman Catholic Church on this one, since they are
dramatically opposed to abortion and funding for abortions! Why haven’t
they spoken against vaccine production with aborted fetuses and informed the
faithful?
How will the thousands who march annually on Washington, DC, to protest the
anniversary of Roe v Wade feel about not being told that they are having
aborted baby cells injected into their bodies? There’s another segment of
society that also has a ‘bone to pick’ about a vaccine ingredient: porcine
/pig DNA, the Muslim community.
The you-know-what hit the fan in Indonesia recently when Muslims found out
that they have been injected with pig DNA for numerous years now. Pork in
any fashion is totally anathema to their religious beliefs. See http://thejakartaglobe.com/news/government-hajj-pilgrims-must-be-vaccinated/317250 Apparently there is no ethical regard for an individual’s personal beliefs.
Members of the Jewish faith also abstain from pork. And yet, these products
are forcibly injected into people. What will happen under E.O. 13544 Sec. 3(
b) that calls for developing the most effective and achievable means of
improving the health status of Americans and reducing the incidence of
preventable illness and disability in the United States… Can you hear the
cheering at big pharma’s vaccine divisions?
In Sec. 3(c) one has to question what recommendations will be made to the
President and the Congress concerning the most pressing health issues
confronting the United States. If vaccines are not thoroughly investigated
as to their ingredients and pseudo-science often produced, paid for, and
published in sham peer review journals, since they are a probable cause of
both autism and Alzheimer’s disease, then we can expect everyone in the
world to become daffy ducks.
Section 3(d) calls for innovative approaches for the promotion of
transformative models of prevention, integrative health, and public health
on individual and community levels across the United States. Here’s where I
think everyone on the Internet sees Codex and WHO fingerprints all over the
document. However, here’s this writer’s spin on it: This should be a
mandate that complementary alternative medicine (CAM) be included in the mix
of transformative models for prevention on the individual and community
levels because nothing is more effective and transformative than CAM, which
does not burn and fry cancer patients; hijack a person’s DNA; or pump a
patient with up to twelve prescription, chemicalized drugs a day. Just look
in any senior citizen’s medicine cabinet. Question: Can you poison a body
into wellness?
Section 3(g) intrigues this writer since it states that the activities are
determined appropriate by the President. Hold the phone! First, what are the
president’s areas of expertise in health/healthcare that he should tell
anyone anything about health? Where is an individual’s right to self-
determination? Or, if the One-World government will be enacted by this E.O.,
then I guess he will have the right that we now equate with a DICTATOR.
This writer is old enough to remember Adolph Hitler’s famous programs for
improving society. This smacks so very close to that, that I can’t believe
I’m even saying it.
Shouldn’t taxpayers who foot the bill for all the president’s laws know
the names of the advisory group members from the fourteen agencies
represented, including preventive medicine. Is there a member or two from
CAM? If not, why not?
Section 5 calls for a National Prevention and Health Strategy. Complementary
alternative medicine needs to be represented there because over 50 percent
[2] of U.S. citizens utilize it, and we are taxpayers too! Will the strategy
include eliminating GMO foods and chemicals in our food, water, and air? If
not, why not?
Under Sec. 5(c) this question must be asked: Whose criteria will apply for
the millions of U.S. citizens who utilize complementary alternative medicine
; do not accept vaccines/vaccinations; and rely upon nutrients and
homeopathy to maintain their health?
Proper nutrition is addressed in Sec. 6(c). Well, this is where there’s
going to be a huge debate about such things as Frankenfish, GMO foods forced
upon U.S. consumers without their knowledge—and why when the
European Union mandates GMO food be labeled and FDA doesn’t? Will the food
processing industry with all its chemical additives, preservatives, and
ersatz food items become the ‘nutrition standard’? Just take a look at
hospital patients’ foods. OMG—you call that food? And one
would think that Registered Dietitians who pride themselves as knowing
nutrition would rebel and demand healthier food for patients.
Sec. 6(e) begs questioning if Federal health programs and centers will
implement Codex and World Health Organization directives. Sec. 6(g) mandates
science-based guidelines. What a joke, when the U.S. FDA mandates that GMO
food items are “substantially equivalent foods”. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_equivalence If the president really wants U.S. citizens to be healthy, he better start looking elsewhere and not to the FDA about food and nutrition, since “substantially equivalent foods” are wiggle room words that need parsing by real food scientists and not GMO agricom hacks, I think.
So you see, based upon this analysis of Presidential Executive Order 13544,
you can see why there is so much Codex implementation associated with it.
Perhaps to clarify everything, Mr. Obama would like to issue another
Executive Order stating that in no way will Codex Alimentarius be
implemented in the United States and that the World Health Organization (WHO
) and/or the United Nations (UN) have no business in the business of running
the United States of America.
If you feel that way, why don’t you reproduce this open letter and send it
to your three members of Congress: two Senators and one Member of the House
from your state.
References
The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States,
accessed 9/19/10 http://nccam.nih.gov/news/camstats/2007/camsurvey_fs1.htm
Health Promotion, and Public Health Council
By Catherine J. Frompovich | September 21st, 2010
(An Open Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama & The National Prevention,
Health Promotion, and Public Health Council As created under Executive
Order 13544 of June 10, 2010)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Since voters, consumers, and taxpayers have NO input nor any ability to
accept, reject, or counter FORCED legislation as enacted by Presidential
Executive Orders—nor does Congress have any authority over
them, which I find absolutely counter to a democratic form of governance
226;€”I think it behooves us all to examine Presidential Executive
Order 13544 in view of what it may and can portend for We, the People.
There are many interpretations that Obama “gave away the store” with
regard to the USA accepting Codex Alimentarius, that draconian One-World
edict regarding the U.S. food supply. One thing that puzzles this writer is
how the U.S. FDA and USDA can stand for relinquishing its supposed oversight
of the U.S. food supply to someone else, unless, of course, they are in
cahoots with Codex and plan to implement Codex, which seems like the only
logical scenario since we don’t hear these agencies protesting their
usurpation.
Although Codex Alimentarius is mentioned nowhere in E.O. 13544, one has to
wonder while reading it, if it is mentioned “between the lines.” The other
One-World player, the World Health Organization (WHO), also is not
mentioned but, again, its ephemeral fingerprints seem to be all over 13544.
It’s a well-known “secret” that WHO and Codex are not consumer-friendly
about much that has to do with vitamin and mineral supplementation,
homeopathy, complementary alternative medicine (CAM), and a ‘chemical-free
’ lifestyle.
In the United States, approximately 38 percent of adults (about 4 in 10) and
approximately 12 percent of children (about 1 in 9) are using some form of
CAM.[1]
Reading Sec. 3(a) of E.O. 13544 every U.S. healthcare consumer must realize
that there’s the real potential for WHO and its directives to be ‘calling
the shots’—literally and figuratively—in the
USA regarding healthcare, as it did with its erroneous pandemic of 2009 that
did NOT pan out; cost jillions of dollars for hastily manufactured and
basically a two-week-testing period of H1N1 flu vaccines that numerous
people rejected and resulted in surpluses being destroyed, which
coincidentally resulted in lower-than-ever death rates from seasonal flu.
Consequently the CDC went back to the drawing board and revised those
statistics lower. See CDC Revises Death Estimates from Flu http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=119215
Still referring to Sec. 3(a), healthcare consumers need to ask, “Is
complementary alternative medicine (CAM) included under integrative health
care in the United States,” and if not, why not?
Moving along to Sec. 3 (b) one gets the “willies” here because this is
where the ‘sacred cow’ of medicine, media, pharmaceutical companies, and
public health systems—vaccines and forced vaccinationsâ
8364;”can and probably will be implemented. But this also is where informed
consent and right to self-determination can be denied and over-ridden under
the guise of the One-World philosophy that the “herd” counts more than
the individual, when in reality the herd is being hoodwinked because of mis-
information being divulged on purpose regarding vaccines. Here’s a case in
point.
Numerous vaccines are produced using aborted fetus cells called diploid
cells. Reading a vaccine package insert, one would not equate diploid cells
with aborted babies, but that’s what it is. So, one disturbing question
this writer has to ask is: Where is the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops and the Roman Catholic Church on this one, since they are
dramatically opposed to abortion and funding for abortions! Why haven’t
they spoken against vaccine production with aborted fetuses and informed the
faithful?
How will the thousands who march annually on Washington, DC, to protest the
anniversary of Roe v Wade feel about not being told that they are having
aborted baby cells injected into their bodies? There’s another segment of
society that also has a ‘bone to pick’ about a vaccine ingredient: porcine
/pig DNA, the Muslim community.
The you-know-what hit the fan in Indonesia recently when Muslims found out
that they have been injected with pig DNA for numerous years now. Pork in
any fashion is totally anathema to their religious beliefs. See http://thejakartaglobe.com/news/government-hajj-pilgrims-must-be-vaccinated/317250 Apparently there is no ethical regard for an individual’s personal beliefs.
Members of the Jewish faith also abstain from pork. And yet, these products
are forcibly injected into people. What will happen under E.O. 13544 Sec. 3(
b) that calls for developing the most effective and achievable means of
improving the health status of Americans and reducing the incidence of
preventable illness and disability in the United States… Can you hear the
cheering at big pharma’s vaccine divisions?
In Sec. 3(c) one has to question what recommendations will be made to the
President and the Congress concerning the most pressing health issues
confronting the United States. If vaccines are not thoroughly investigated
as to their ingredients and pseudo-science often produced, paid for, and
published in sham peer review journals, since they are a probable cause of
both autism and Alzheimer’s disease, then we can expect everyone in the
world to become daffy ducks.
Section 3(d) calls for innovative approaches for the promotion of
transformative models of prevention, integrative health, and public health
on individual and community levels across the United States. Here’s where I
think everyone on the Internet sees Codex and WHO fingerprints all over the
document. However, here’s this writer’s spin on it: This should be a
mandate that complementary alternative medicine (CAM) be included in the mix
of transformative models for prevention on the individual and community
levels because nothing is more effective and transformative than CAM, which
does not burn and fry cancer patients; hijack a person’s DNA; or pump a
patient with up to twelve prescription, chemicalized drugs a day. Just look
in any senior citizen’s medicine cabinet. Question: Can you poison a body
into wellness?
Section 3(g) intrigues this writer since it states that the activities are
determined appropriate by the President. Hold the phone! First, what are the
president’s areas of expertise in health/healthcare that he should tell
anyone anything about health? Where is an individual’s right to self-
determination? Or, if the One-World government will be enacted by this E.O.,
then I guess he will have the right that we now equate with a DICTATOR.
This writer is old enough to remember Adolph Hitler’s famous programs for
improving society. This smacks so very close to that, that I can’t believe
I’m even saying it.
Shouldn’t taxpayers who foot the bill for all the president’s laws know
the names of the advisory group members from the fourteen agencies
represented, including preventive medicine. Is there a member or two from
CAM? If not, why not?
Section 5 calls for a National Prevention and Health Strategy. Complementary
alternative medicine needs to be represented there because over 50 percent
[2] of U.S. citizens utilize it, and we are taxpayers too! Will the strategy
include eliminating GMO foods and chemicals in our food, water, and air? If
not, why not?
Under Sec. 5(c) this question must be asked: Whose criteria will apply for
the millions of U.S. citizens who utilize complementary alternative medicine
; do not accept vaccines/vaccinations; and rely upon nutrients and
homeopathy to maintain their health?
Proper nutrition is addressed in Sec. 6(c). Well, this is where there’s
going to be a huge debate about such things as Frankenfish, GMO foods forced
upon U.S. consumers without their knowledge—and why when the
European Union mandates GMO food be labeled and FDA doesn’t? Will the food
processing industry with all its chemical additives, preservatives, and
ersatz food items become the ‘nutrition standard’? Just take a look at
hospital patients’ foods. OMG—you call that food? And one
would think that Registered Dietitians who pride themselves as knowing
nutrition would rebel and demand healthier food for patients.
Sec. 6(e) begs questioning if Federal health programs and centers will
implement Codex and World Health Organization directives. Sec. 6(g) mandates
science-based guidelines. What a joke, when the U.S. FDA mandates that GMO
food items are “substantially equivalent foods”. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_equivalence If the president really wants U.S. citizens to be healthy, he better start looking elsewhere and not to the FDA about food and nutrition, since “substantially equivalent foods” are wiggle room words that need parsing by real food scientists and not GMO agricom hacks, I think.
So you see, based upon this analysis of Presidential Executive Order 13544,
you can see why there is so much Codex implementation associated with it.
Perhaps to clarify everything, Mr. Obama would like to issue another
Executive Order stating that in no way will Codex Alimentarius be
implemented in the United States and that the World Health Organization (WHO
) and/or the United Nations (UN) have no business in the business of running
the United States of America.
If you feel that way, why don’t you reproduce this open letter and send it
to your three members of Congress: two Senators and one Member of the House
from your state.
References
The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States,
accessed 9/19/10 http://nccam.nih.gov/news/camstats/2007/camsurvey_fs1.htm
f*o
3 楼
去年暑假开始炒股, 赚了些钱(大约10K)
然后秋季忙着毕业找工作, 就把帐户上的钱买了几个股票准备长期捂着
现在那些股票缩水厉害, 基本上赚的都回去了
报税的话帐面上有不少盈利, 要补税, 但是不甘心, 因为现在没赚钱 :(
请教大家怎么样才能减少些去年的income, 现在存IRA行不行?
可以存到现在公司的IRA帐户, 还是要自己开一个?
多谢~~~
然后秋季忙着毕业找工作, 就把帐户上的钱买了几个股票准备长期捂着
现在那些股票缩水厉害, 基本上赚的都回去了
报税的话帐面上有不少盈利, 要补税, 但是不甘心, 因为现在没赚钱 :(
请教大家怎么样才能减少些去年的income, 现在存IRA行不行?
可以存到现在公司的IRA帐户, 还是要自己开一个?
多谢~~~
l*h
4 楼
今天上午，LIA的游说公司从罗富贵的DC办公室得到确认，由游说公司推荐的一位在DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
同时也一并感谢十多位挺身而出的报名者。由于名额有限，游说公司决定把机会给这位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
大家可以跟帖出主意，分享你的事例，帮助我们的代表收集作证用的素材。
到6/5日，已有十多位同胞愿意在国会的听证会上作证。感谢大家的参与。lobbyist已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选名单，由委员会最终拍板。
紧急通知，报名截止期6月5日晚西部时间12点！！
众议院本月12日上午9:30即将举行关于罗富贵STEM法案的听证会。罗办深知LIA的多数
会员有高级学位，因此特别致电我们的游说公司，要求我们出一个代表，以自己的切身
经历痛陈绿卡排期的弊端。
要求如下：
1. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemati
同时也一并感谢十多位挺身而出的报名者。由于名额有限，游说公司决定把机会给这位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
大家可以跟帖出主意，分享你的事例，帮助我们的代表收集作证用的素材。
到6/5日，已有十多位同胞愿意在国会的听证会上作证。感谢大家的参与。lobbyist已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选名单，由委员会最终拍板。
紧急通知，报名截止期6月5日晚西部时间12点！！
众议院本月12日上午9:30即将举行关于罗富贵STEM法案的听证会。罗办深知LIA的多数
会员有高级学位，因此特别致电我们的游说公司，要求我们出一个代表，以自己的切身
经历痛陈绿卡排期的弊端。
要求如下：
1. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemati
g*i
5 楼
去年大幅裁员，薪水降了不少。今年要第二次h1b延期，但是现在的prevailing wage比
以前要求还涨了不少。所以现在延期发现薪水差了不少。在律师要求下，已经和老板说
了，希望到新h1b生效时能涨上去。不知道这样是不是就没有问题了。不知道延期时要
交上去的paystub 发现我现在薪水比上次延h1b时低有没有问题。 我的PD在07年底，
140倒是在2008年批了，以前都没有薪水不够的问题。去年这个经济差呀，我们这个行
业有工作的人就幸运了，知道的人多数都降薪了，不知道为啥prevailing wage还上涨
了！ 完全不给我们这些移民活路呀。
不知道谁有过类似经历和经验，请告知一下。多谢了。
以前要求还涨了不少。所以现在延期发现薪水差了不少。在律师要求下，已经和老板说
了，希望到新h1b生效时能涨上去。不知道这样是不是就没有问题了。不知道延期时要
交上去的paystub 发现我现在薪水比上次延h1b时低有没有问题。 我的PD在07年底，
140倒是在2008年批了，以前都没有薪水不够的问题。去年这个经济差呀，我们这个行
业有工作的人就幸运了，知道的人多数都降薪了，不知道为啥prevailing wage还上涨
了！ 完全不给我们这些移民活路呀。
不知道谁有过类似经历和经验，请告知一下。多谢了。
j*l
6 楼
前天晚上是很惨的。本来以为生物起床法会很有效率。结果刚睡半个小时，迷迷糊糊得
意之中，忽然隐约听到细细簌簌的声音，就像耳边有个人在弄衣服，一下子就吓醒了，
屋子里也不大应该没人。然后再听，真的。。精神了，下床四处看，花了好多时间，看
了半天，就要放弃之际在墙角看到一只硕大的小强。。。半夜这个时候，太恶心了。it
居然还能顺着桌角爬上桌面来。不能用拖鞋打，找了半天东西，拿硬纸板一顿拍。比较
环保，因为地面很厚的地毯，感觉一点内伤也不会有，想着至多是打晕了。没想到还真
有效，在it乱跑过程中，打了好久终于倒下了，想象着it鼻青脸肿的样子，我抬了it出
去，下水道，冲下。心里出了气，不过回来就睡不着了，好多天没有的失眠出现了。很
惨的一个夜晚。。
看来差不多需要准备点药了。
意之中，忽然隐约听到细细簌簌的声音，就像耳边有个人在弄衣服，一下子就吓醒了，
屋子里也不大应该没人。然后再听，真的。。精神了，下床四处看，花了好多时间，看
了半天，就要放弃之际在墙角看到一只硕大的小强。。。半夜这个时候，太恶心了。it
居然还能顺着桌角爬上桌面来。不能用拖鞋打，找了半天东西，拿硬纸板一顿拍。比较
环保，因为地面很厚的地毯，感觉一点内伤也不会有，想着至多是打晕了。没想到还真
有效，在it乱跑过程中，打了好久终于倒下了，想象着it鼻青脸肿的样子，我抬了it出
去，下水道，冲下。心里出了气，不过回来就睡不着了，好多天没有的失眠出现了。很
惨的一个夜晚。。
看来差不多需要准备点药了。
s*a
7 楼
我觉得没啥区别……输出阻抗小就行
这篇文章写得挺好：http://www.audio-gd.com/audio/new_page_19.htm
这篇文章写得挺好：http://www.audio-gd.com/audio/new_page_19.htm
h*s
8 楼
good
DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证
。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇
气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选
名单，由委员会最终拍板。
【在 l********h 的大作中提到】
: 今天上午，LIA的游说公司从罗富贵的DC办公室得到确认，由游说公司推荐的一位在DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
: 同时也一并感谢十多位挺身而出的报名者。由于名额有限，游说公司决定把机会给这位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
: 大家可以跟帖出主意，分享你的事例，帮助我们的代表收集作证用的素材。
: 到6/5日，已有十多位同胞愿意在国会的听证会上作证。感谢大家的参与。lobbyist已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选名单，由委员会最终拍板。
: 紧急通知，报名截止期6月5日晚西部时间12点！！
: 众议院本月12日上午9:30即将举行关于罗富贵STEM法案的听证会。罗办深知LIA的多数
: 会员有高级学位，因此特别致电我们的游说公司，要求我们出一个代表，以自己的切身
: 经历痛陈绿卡排期的弊端。
: 要求如下：
: 1. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemati
DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证
。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇
气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选
名单，由委员会最终拍板。
【在 l********h 的大作中提到】
: 今天上午，LIA的游说公司从罗富贵的DC办公室得到确认，由游说公司推荐的一位在DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
: 同时也一并感谢十多位挺身而出的报名者。由于名额有限，游说公司决定把机会给这位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
: 大家可以跟帖出主意，分享你的事例，帮助我们的代表收集作证用的素材。
: 到6/5日，已有十多位同胞愿意在国会的听证会上作证。感谢大家的参与。lobbyist已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选名单，由委员会最终拍板。
: 紧急通知，报名截止期6月5日晚西部时间12点！！
: 众议院本月12日上午9:30即将举行关于罗富贵STEM法案的听证会。罗办深知LIA的多数
: 会员有高级学位，因此特别致电我们的游说公司，要求我们出一个代表，以自己的切身
: 经历痛陈绿卡排期的弊端。
: 要求如下：
: 1. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemati
g*o
9 楼
弱弱的问一下,prevailing wage 你是怎么知道的?是律师 告诉你的吗?
p*e
10 楼
耳放一般不提输出阻抗
http://www.headamp.com/home_amps/lite/index.htm
看这个gilmore lite也就声称 Output Impedance less than 1 ohm
我看不懂这个output impendence什么意思;
http://www.rotel.com/NA/products/ProductDetails.htm?Id=486&Tab=2&Pic=1
我觉得没啥区别……输出阻抗小就行
这篇文章写得挺好：http://www.audio-gd.com/audio/new_page_19.htm
【在 s*******a 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得没啥区别……输出阻抗小就行
: 这篇文章写得挺好：http://www.audio-gd.com/audio/new_page_19.htm
http://www.headamp.com/home_amps/lite/index.htm
看这个gilmore lite也就声称 Output Impedance less than 1 ohm
我看不懂这个output impendence什么意思;
http://www.rotel.com/NA/products/ProductDetails.htm?Id=486&Tab=2&Pic=1
我觉得没啥区别……输出阻抗小就行
这篇文章写得挺好：http://www.audio-gd.com/audio/new_page_19.htm
【在 s*******a 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得没啥区别……输出阻抗小就行
: 这篇文章写得挺好：http://www.audio-gd.com/audio/new_page_19.htm
w*r
11 楼
顶
W*r
12 楼
改个title试试？
【在 g***i 的大作中提到】
: 去年大幅裁员，薪水降了不少。今年要第二次h1b延期，但是现在的prevailing wage比
: 以前要求还涨了不少。所以现在延期发现薪水差了不少。在律师要求下，已经和老板说
: 了，希望到新h1b生效时能涨上去。不知道这样是不是就没有问题了。不知道延期时要
: 交上去的paystub 发现我现在薪水比上次延h1b时低有没有问题。 我的PD在07年底，
: 140倒是在2008年批了，以前都没有薪水不够的问题。去年这个经济差呀，我们这个行
: 业有工作的人就幸运了，知道的人多数都降薪了，不知道为啥prevailing wage还上涨
: 了！ 完全不给我们这些移民活路呀。
: 不知道谁有过类似经历和经验，请告知一下。多谢了。
【在 g***i 的大作中提到】
: 去年大幅裁员，薪水降了不少。今年要第二次h1b延期，但是现在的prevailing wage比
: 以前要求还涨了不少。所以现在延期发现薪水差了不少。在律师要求下，已经和老板说
: 了，希望到新h1b生效时能涨上去。不知道这样是不是就没有问题了。不知道延期时要
: 交上去的paystub 发现我现在薪水比上次延h1b时低有没有问题。 我的PD在07年底，
: 140倒是在2008年批了，以前都没有薪水不够的问题。去年这个经济差呀，我们这个行
: 业有工作的人就幸运了，知道的人多数都降薪了，不知道为啥prevailing wage还上涨
: 了！ 完全不给我们这些移民活路呀。
: 不知道谁有过类似经历和经验，请告知一下。多谢了。
s*a
13 楼
我的意思是输出阻抗够小就行——所以耳放应该都行
不知道output sensitivity是什么
不知道output sensitivity是什么
p*g
14 楼
ding
a*s
15 楼
耳放的要求大于前级，毕竟箱子灵敏度不如耳机高。
H*k
16 楼
两年前的事情了。
【在 h*******s 的大作中提到】
: good
:
: DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证
: 。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇
: 气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
: 位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
: 已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选
: 名单，由委员会最终拍板。
【在 h*******s 的大作中提到】
: good
:
: DC附近的中国生物学者（LIA会员）将在下周四的众议院关于STEM法案的听证会上作证
: 。据LIA所知，他将是唯一一位代表中国和全世界EB移民出席作证的人。我们对他的勇
: 气和奉献精神深表钦佩！
: 位有代表性和表达能力的同胞。
: 已经和大多数人联系过。经筛选后，lobbyist已经给众议院移民委员会提供了一个候选
: 名单，由委员会最终拍板。
p*e
17 楼
但是在耳放/前级之间还有一个巨大的功放(power amp)，我的是120Winto 8ohm
耳放的要求大于前级，毕竟箱子灵敏度不如耳机高。
【在 a******s 的大作中提到】
: 耳放的要求大于前级，毕竟箱子灵敏度不如耳机高。
耳放的要求大于前级，毕竟箱子灵敏度不如耳机高。
【在 a******s 的大作中提到】
: 耳放的要求大于前级，毕竟箱子灵敏度不如耳机高。
h*s
18 楼
记得前级是放大电压（改变音色），后级是放大电流（提高输出）
耳放就是合起来的了
也就是说前级的电流够的情况下，跟耳放可能区别不大
我曾经想买胆前级当耳放用，虽然我认为那前级的电流够应付我耳机了，但是卖家不建
议我买，结果没买
耳放就是合起来的了
也就是说前级的电流够的情况下，跟耳放可能区别不大
我曾经想买胆前级当耳放用，虽然我认为那前级的电流够应付我耳机了，但是卖家不建
议我买，结果没买
a9
19 楼
请问电流放大阿？
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 记得前级是放大电压（改变音色），后级是放大电流（提高输出）
: 耳放就是合起来的了
: 也就是说前级的电流够的情况下，跟耳放可能区别不大
: 我曾经想买胆前级当耳放用，虽然我认为那前级的电流够应付我耳机了，但是卖家不建
: 议我买，结果没买
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 记得前级是放大电压（改变音色），后级是放大电流（提高输出）
: 耳放就是合起来的了
: 也就是说前级的电流够的情况下，跟耳放可能区别不大
: 我曾经想买胆前级当耳放用，虽然我认为那前级的电流够应付我耳机了，但是卖家不建
: 议我买，结果没买
s*8
20 楼
电路上没有区别。原理上没有区别。
大部分前级都是没有耳机输出口的，100%的耳放是可以直接当前级用的。
楼主看一看前级的大小，看一看展厅耳机耳放的搭配，然后就知道了什么是妥协。
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 记得前级是放大电压（改变音色），后级是放大电流（提高输出）
: 耳放就是合起来的了
: 也就是说前级的电流够的情况下，跟耳放可能区别不大
: 我曾经想买胆前级当耳放用，虽然我认为那前级的电流够应付我耳机了，但是卖家不建
: 议我买，结果没买
大部分前级都是没有耳机输出口的，100%的耳放是可以直接当前级用的。
楼主看一看前级的大小，看一看展厅耳机耳放的搭配，然后就知道了什么是妥协。
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 记得前级是放大电压（改变音色），后级是放大电流（提高输出）
: 耳放就是合起来的了
: 也就是说前级的电流够的情况下，跟耳放可能区别不大
: 我曾经想买胆前级当耳放用，虽然我认为那前级的电流够应付我耳机了，但是卖家不建
: 议我买，结果没买
f*e
21 楼
奇怪，我买的所有前级都有耳机口，而且听上去都不错
看来我还是不够hifi,呵呵
看来我还是不够hifi,呵呵
p*e
22 楼
没看懂您的话
电路上没有区别。原理上没有区别。
大部分前级都是没有耳机输出口的，100%的耳放是可以直接当前级用的。
楼主看一看前级的大小，看一看展厅耳机耳放的搭配，然后就知道了什么是妥协。
【在 s*******8 的大作中提到】
: 电路上没有区别。原理上没有区别。
: 大部分前级都是没有耳机输出口的，100%的耳放是可以直接当前级用的。
: 楼主看一看前级的大小，看一看展厅耳机耳放的搭配，然后就知道了什么是妥协。
电路上没有区别。原理上没有区别。
大部分前级都是没有耳机输出口的，100%的耳放是可以直接当前级用的。
楼主看一看前级的大小，看一看展厅耳机耳放的搭配，然后就知道了什么是妥协。
【在 s*******8 的大作中提到】
: 电路上没有区别。原理上没有区别。
: 大部分前级都是没有耳机输出口的，100%的耳放是可以直接当前级用的。
: 楼主看一看前级的大小，看一看展厅耳机耳放的搭配，然后就知道了什么是妥协。
h*s
23 楼
前级处理增强了信号的电压（两个节点的电势差）幅度，能够改变音色
后级处理加大电流（通过导体的电荷的量）输出能力，使声音有力度
【在 a9 的大作中提到】
: 请问电流放大阿？
后级处理加大电流（通过导体的电荷的量）输出能力，使声音有力度
【在 a9 的大作中提到】
: 请问电流放大阿？
a9
24 楼
我只知道U=IR 没见过只增加电流，电压不变的。
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 前级处理增强了信号的电压（两个节点的电势差）幅度，能够改变音色
: 后级处理加大电流（通过导体的电荷的量）输出能力，使声音有力度
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 前级处理增强了信号的电压（两个节点的电势差）幅度，能够改变音色
: 后级处理加大电流（通过导体的电荷的量）输出能力，使声音有力度
L*k
25 楼
这个你可以研究一下电压放大和电流放大的原理。
晶体管，电子管的用途就在于此。
【在 a9 的大作中提到】
: 我只知道U=IR 没见过只增加电流，电压不变的。
晶体管，电子管的用途就在于此。
【在 a9 的大作中提到】
: 我只知道U=IR 没见过只增加电流，电压不变的。
m*d
26 楼
为啥改变了幅度就改变了音色，音色难道不是应该跟频率有关么
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 前级处理增强了信号的电压（两个节点的电势差）幅度，能够改变音色
: 后级处理加大电流（通过导体的电荷的量）输出能力，使声音有力度
【在 h**s 的大作中提到】
: 前级处理增强了信号的电压（两个节点的电势差）幅度，能够改变音色
: 后级处理加大电流（通过导体的电荷的量）输出能力，使声音有力度
h*s
27 楼
那是实体的
【在 m*d 的大作中提到】
: 为啥改变了幅度就改变了音色，音色难道不是应该跟频率有关么
【在 m*d 的大作中提到】
: 为啥改变了幅度就改变了音色，音色难道不是应该跟频率有关么
相关阅读