分享－－关于子女教育 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Midlife - 人到中年

分享－－关于子女教育

分享－－关于子女教育# Midlife - 人到中年

M*72014-02-26 08:02

1 楼

接受NON-CC PAYPAL，东西有的包邮有的不包邮，也可以COMBINE。
所卖的东西都是在保质期内的东西，请放心购买，送的东西大部分接近保质期极限，也有新的，请自行选择。
1。昭贵纸面膜&昭贵芦荟凝胶汁
功效十分强大的滋养面膜（共九片），美白，收缩毛孔，去痘痕。。。。。。
同样功效强大的凝胶汁（500ML，大概还有2/3，经济型，可以自己DIY纸膜敷脸）。
两个一起走，25包邮
2。MISSHA的男式面膜，这个买错了，偶以为是女式的，谁家的猪头来领走啊。。。。
。。
共计8片，6刀包邮。
3。LANCOME的蓝水（TONIQUE DOUCEUR），去年从FAYEWANG MM那里来的，忘了多少钱来的了，200ML，全新，官网价格上24。5
http://www.lancome-usa.com/skincare/cleansers-toners/tonique-douceur.htm
现在16/瓶，或者30/两瓶。邮费这个另算吧。

m*j2014-02-26 08:02

2 楼

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — LAST June, in an interview with Adam Bryant of The
Times, Laszlo Bock, the senior vice president of people operations for
Google — i.e., the guy in charge of hiring for one of the world’s most
successful companies — noted that Google had determined that “G.P.A.’s
are worthless as a criteria for hiring, and test scores are worthless. ...
We found that they don’t predict anything.” He also noted that the “
proportion of people without any college education at Google has increased
over time” — now as high as 14 percent on some teams. At a time when many
people are asking, “How’s my kid gonna get a job?” I thought it would be
useful to visit Google and hear how Bock would answer.
Don’t get him wrong, Bock begins, “Good grades certainly don’t hurt.”
Many jobs at Google require math, computing and coding skills, so if your
good grades truly reflect skills in those areas that you can apply, it would
be an advantage. But Google has its eyes on much more.
“There are five hiring attributes we have across the company,” explained
Bock. “If it’s a technical role, we assess your coding ability, and half
the roles in the company are technical roles. For every job, though, the No.
1 thing we look for is general cognitive ability, and it’s not I.Q. It’s
learning ability. It’s the ability to process on the fly. It’s the ability
to pull together disparate bits of information. We assess that using
structured behavioral interviews that we validate to make sure they’re
predictive.”
The second, he added, “is leadership — in particular emergent leadership
as opposed to traditional leadership. Traditional leadership is, were you
president of the chess club? Were you vice president of sales? How quickly
did you get there? We don’t care. What we care about is, when faced with a
problem and you’re a member of a team, do you, at the appropriate time,
step in and lead. And just as critically, do you step back and stop leading,
do you let someone else? Because what’s critical to be an effective leader
in this environment is you have to be willing to relinquish power.”
What else? Humility and ownership. “It’s feeling the sense of
responsibility, the sense of ownership, to step in,” he said, to try to
solve any problem — and the humility to step back and embrace the better
ideas of others. “Your end goal,” explained Bock, “is what can we do
together to problem-solve. I’ve contributed my piece, and then I step back.”
And it is not just humility in creating space for others to contribute, says
Bock, it’s “intellectual humility. Without humility, you are unable to
learn.” It is why research shows that many graduates from hotshot business
schools plateau. “Successful bright people rarely experience failure, and
so they don’t learn how to learn from that failure,” said Bock.
“They, instead, commit the fundamental attribution error, which is if
something good happens, it’s because I’m a genius. If something bad
happens, it’s because someone’s an idiot or I didn’t get the resources or
the market moved. ... What we’ve seen is that the people who are the most
successful here, who we want to hire, will have a fierce position. They’ll
argue like hell. They’ll be zealots about their point of view. But then you
say, ‘here’s a new fact,’ and they’ll go, ‘Oh, well, that changes
things; you’re right.’ ” You need a big ego and small ego in the same
person at the same time.
The least important attribute they look for is “expertise.” Said Bock: “
If you take somebody who has high cognitive ability, is innately curious,
willing to learn and has emergent leadership skills, and you hire them as an
H.R. person or finance person, and they have no content knowledge, and you
compare them with someone who’s been doing just one thing and is a world
expert, the expert will go: ‘I’ve seen this 100 times before; here’s what
you do.’ ” Most of the time the nonexpert will come up with the same
answer, added Bock, “because most of the time it’s not that hard.” Sure,
once in a while they will mess it up, he said, but once in a while they’ll
also come up with an answer that is totally new. And there is huge value in
that.
To sum up Bock’s approach to hiring: Talent can come in so many different
forms and be built in so many nontraditional ways today, hiring officers
have to be alive to every one — besides brand-name colleges. Because “when
you look at people who don’t go to school and make their way in the world,
those are exceptional human beings. And we should do everything we can to
find those people.” Too many colleges, he added, “don’t deliver on what
they promise. You generate a ton of debt, you don’t learn the most useful
things for your life. It’s [just] an extended adolescence.”
Google attracts so much talent it can afford to look beyond traditional
metrics, like G.P.A. For most young people, though, going to college and
doing well is still the best way to master the tools needed for many careers
. But Bock is saying something important to them, too: Beware. Your degree
is not a proxy for your ability to do any job. The world only cares about —
and pays off on — what you can do with what you know (and it doesn’t care
how you learned it). And in an age when innovation is increasingly a group
endeavor, it also cares about a lot of soft skills — leadership, humility,
collaboration, adaptability and loving to learn and re-learn. This will be
true no matter where you go to work.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/opinion/sunday/friedman-how-t

M*72014-02-26 08:02

3 楼

4。L‘OCCITANE的RADIANCE MOISTURE CREAM
橄榄油面霜
http://www.izzysbeautyshoppe.com/loccitane_olive_radiance_cream_50ml.html
找到个连接，这个屯了快两年了，还有一大半呢，谁不嫌弃，5刀拿去试试吧，邮费另算吧。批号：8419A267，或者买下面的血糖针头和试片，就免费送了。
5。一套血糖仪的针头和试片，这个糖妈们应该熟悉怎么用吧。25包邮吧，这个走保险
挺贵的，自己付了60刀呢。
针头保质期到2013年5月，试片有三盒保质期到2010/11/30，有一盒到2010/8/31（算赠
送吧）

m*j2014-02-26 08:02

4 楼

原文很长，摘了里面几句话：
proportion of people without any college education at Google has increased
over time” — now as high as 14 percent on some teams.
if your good grades truly reflect skills in those areas that you can apply,
it would be an advantage.
For every job, though, the No. 1 thing we look for is general cognitive
ability, and it’s not I.Q. It’s learning ability.
What we care about is, when faced with a problem and you’re a member of a
team, do you, at the appropriate time, step in and lead. And just as
critically, do you step back and stop leading。
You need a big ego and small ego in the same person at the same time.
The least important attribute they look for is “expertise.”....the expert
will go: ‘I’ve seen this 100 times before; here’s what you do.’ ” Most
of the time the nonexpert will come up with the same answer, added Bock, “
because most of the time it’s not that hard.” Sure, once in a while they
will mess it up, he said, but once in a while they’ll also come up with an
answer that is totally new. And there is huge value in that.
The world only cares about — and pays off on — what you can do with what
you know (and it doesn’t care how you learned it).
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Sum up:
in an age when innovation is increasingly a group endeavor, it also cares
about a lot of soft skills — leadership, humility, collaboration,
adaptability and loving to learn and re-learn. This will be true no matter
where you go to work.

M*72014-02-26 08:02

5 楼

这层是国内美容院产品，偶姨开美容院滴，每次都让我妈给我捎好多国内的东西，我也
没用过，现在便宜转了吧。
6。一套叫欧瑞丽的抗皱产品，包括洁面乳（100G），滋润乳（100ML），抗皱霜（50G）
一套15包邮吧。
7。还是个国内的牌子，一大盒，丽莎菲尔，
要转的是：
小瓶装的RGF细胞修复液（3ML/瓶），共22瓶（有两瓶来的时候飞机上漏了，被偶扔了）
还有一个仿生高波美容笔，是和小瓶的一起用的，就是小瓶涂脸上，用笔头按摸，会发
红光，挺神的。
这个产品的功效主要是美白，淡化色斑的。
这个也15包邮吧（这个包邮不带盒，那个盒子太大啦）

g*02014-02-26 08:02

6 楼

很好，总结就是能力比成绩重要，能力还要和适当的情商结合才会行之有效，做好事情
比表现自己重要。

M*72014-02-26 08:02

7 楼

这层都新的，没用过的，不包邮
8。皮肤科医生给开的去痘药，没用过，谁想试试，10刀。
9。EL的ANR眼霜小样和一个绿色的面霜，两个一起10刀。
10。EL的乱七八糟的赠品，眼影，两口红和一个唇彩色，还有包小刷子，一共7刀。

n*s2014-02-26 08:02

8 楼

其实, 见识比能力和才干更胜一筹, 可有几个父母肯劝子女去学历史,哲学,心理学和
社会学?

M*72014-02-26 08:02

9 楼

这层都是5刀品，不包邮
ALBA面膜，全新，GEL状
CLARIN的油，涂身体，这个用来去妊娠纹不错。
倩碧的去痘的东西，还剩最少一半，去年买的。
两个老黄玉的手机链（5刀/个）
ESPRIT的男式皮钱包，里面能放很多卡，拉链的。
纯银项链，全新，无盒。

m*j2014-02-26 08:02

10 楼

孩子在大学基本就自己选了。选心理学的应该不少。
不过，再小点的时候也许更重要。
看远了，才能调整好大方向。

【在 n*******s 的大作中提到】

: 其实, 见识比能力和才干更胜一筹, 可有几个父母肯劝子女去学历史,哲学,心理学和
: 社会学?

M*72014-02-26 08:02

11 楼

这层不包邮
1。男式银手链，挺粗的，这个的挂钩那个地方被我家娃咬下来了（她很强大吧），但
不影响戴，谁不嫌弃，10刀拿去吧，还带个皮盒呢。
2。两个JUICY的墨镜，全新，TJ来的三无产品，原价39来的，各种原因，不想再屯了，20/个
3。DG墨镜，有戴过，原价50多吧，有磨痕。无盒无布，15刀

m*j2014-02-26 08:02

12 楼

有没有可以分享的经验啊？

【在 g*******0 的大作中提到】

: 很好，总结就是能力比成绩重要，能力还要和适当的情商结合才会行之有效，做好事情
: 比表现自己重要。

M*72014-02-26 08:02

13 楼

这层都赠品，单要也可以，自己出邮费，大部分是屯了超过两年的东西，谁不嫌弃，涂
胳膊涂腿，应该还能用。
ANNA SUI的美白面膜，还有最少1/3吧，300多港币来的，不太好洗掉，屯了两年半了，
谁不嫌弃，拿去吧。
德国产的BALEA护手霜，也屯了两年半了，不嫌弃的拿去试试吧。
DIOR SNOW的粉饼，也是屯了两年半了，也用过不少，谁不嫌弃，拿去擦胳膊腿吧。
FANCL的卸妆乳，这个我太心疼了，我都不知道冰箱里居然还藏了个这东西，全新没拆
的，但可惜已经过期了，2005年的东西了，谁不嫌弃，拿去卸胳膊腿上的妆吧。
日本店买的米酒TONER，还有个可采的玫瑰TONER，这两都去年的产品，还算新点吧。
BOOTS的冷霜，这个新的，今年刚买的，我油皮用着太用，只有了一次，基本全新，不
嫌弃的拿去试试吧。

g*02014-02-26 08:02

14 楼

惭愧，孩子进入teen,自己也在用最原始的高压政策。总觉得成长是靠自己的悟性的，
培养能力，培养成熟的处事为人的态度，这些除了有人提醒，关键还是自己的悟性。

【在 m******j 的大作中提到】

: 有没有可以分享的经验啊？

M*72014-02-26 08:02

15 楼

UP一个。。。。。。