Redian新闻
>
iTouch可以看qqlive的电视剧么?
avatar
iTouch可以看qqlive的电视剧么?# PDA - 掌中宝
c*k
1
当前的学校没买,然后查了我博士毕业院校,发现也没买Engineering village这个数
据库,Engineering village 数据库难道搞工程的用得不多吗?
avatar
B*g
2
首届齐鲁科技论坛将于山东大学校庆日期间举办,旨在搭建海内外优秀青年学者学术交
流的平台,通过学术报告和研讨,促进海内外青年学者之间的交流和合作。
论坛采取主论坛和分论坛相结合的方式,拟设置数学、材料科学与工程、生物学、物理
学、化学、机械工程、土木工程、控制科学与工程、大数据处理与可视计算、动力工程
及工程热物理、空间科学与天文(威海)十一个分论坛。
主办单位为每位受邀参会学者提供往返差旅经费一万元人民币(实报实销),论坛期间
食宿由主办单位统一安排。
报名条件:
1.青年千人、青年拔尖人才、优青及青年长江获得者;
2.年龄在38岁以下;具有海外知名大学博士学位,或者具有国内知名大学博士学位,并
在海外工作2年以上;在本领域取得具有重要学术影响的标志性研究成果,具有较强的
学术潜力,学术水平居于本学科领域同年龄段学者前列的海内外优秀青年人才。
详见:http://202.194.14.83/
欢迎大家参加!
avatar
v*s
3
用turbotax从哪里填那个学生5000的tax treaty的?
另外我看turbo tax好像没有要我们什么时候来美国的信息什么的,他们怎么判断我们
的residency status的呢?
avatar
a*y
4
【 以下文字转载自 PDA 讨论区 】
发信人: aaaty (阿fan提), 信区: PDA
标 题: Re: Apple 扔了一个炸弹 -- New Subscription Rules
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 16 01:09:09 2011, 美东)
这个rule貌似允许用户在App Store外进行Subscription啊
比如你在Netflix的网站上subscribe的,交的费,苹果就分不到钱
如果你在Netflix的iPhone, iPad app里选subscribe,通过App Store交的钱,苹果就
可以分到钱。但是苹果只是要求,在Netflix的网站上有的选项,在App Store里也要有。
虽然分30%有点excessive,我觉得10-20%比较合适。就像网上购物的referral的利润一样
subscription separately outside of the app, that same subscription offer
must be made available, at the same price or less, to customers who wish to
subscribe from within the app. In
乐和录像,估计会影响Netflix,Amazon Kindle,Nook Reader, etc
avatar
h*y
6
iTouch可以看qqlive的电视剧么?
我的一直不行啊。
avatar
w*s
7
this is a joke if they force no outside subscription allowed.
for thos subscription surcharge, 30% is rediculous.
allow both web subscription and iphone subscription looks much better, it is
still very bad.
avatar
p*n
8
Right, I want this
avatar
l*e
9
这个真不行
avatar
a*y
10
I think they just wanted to be consistent
but 30% is a little too much
some subcription service may not have 30% margin
but let's be honest
this is bad only for third party developer and media
the terms are very pro-consumer and of course pro-Apple

is

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: this is a joke if they force no outside subscription allowed.
: for thos subscription surcharge, 30% is rediculous.
: allow both web subscription and iphone subscription looks much better, it is
: still very bad.

avatar
N*w
11
不知道屏幕摸多了显脏不

【在 p*******n 的大作中提到】
: Right, I want this
avatar
z*u
12
可以。在App Store里买个程序叫iCabMobile,然后用它上网,把User Agent设成iPad
即可。
avatar
w*s
13
why you think it is good for consumer?
that means consumer need to pay more every month for the content.
apple need to lower this percentage for rsubscription service surcharge.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: I think they just wanted to be consistent
: but 30% is a little too much
: some subcription service may not have 30% margin
: but let's be honest
: this is bad only for third party developer and media
: the terms are very pro-consumer and of course pro-Apple
:
: is

avatar
p*n
14
关掉屏幕显脏的

【在 N****w 的大作中提到】
: 不知道屏幕摸多了显脏不
avatar
b*a
15
如果你的home theater有ipod dock的话,还可以把itouch上的qqlive放到大电视上...
..

iPad

【在 z*****u 的大作中提到】
: 可以。在App Store里买个程序叫iCabMobile,然后用它上网,把User Agent设成iPad
: 即可。

avatar
l*o
16
convienience
and publisher wont get your personal data and sell them for ads or send you
junk mails.
Apple has 100% rights to ask for split for stuff sold through App Store.
just like you can't just put your stuff in walmart and sell it without
paying walmart.
The only issue is that Apple demands no bypassing App Store. if your app is
selling subscription, you have to include in-app subscription along with out
-of-app paying mechanism. apple is betting customers would prefer in-app
subscription. and they will take the cut.
it is steep, 30%, but without Apple making the whole ecosystem, the platform
, the devices, the SDK, these publishers won't make much money by themselves
anyway

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: why you think it is good for consumer?
: that means consumer need to pay more every month for the content.
: apple need to lower this percentage for rsubscription service surcharge.

avatar
w*y
17
关掉T400s multitouch LCD,摸过地方很干净,没摸过的有落灰。
所以,我觉得相反,不摸的地方才会现脏。

【在 p*******n 的大作中提到】
: 关掉屏幕显脏的
avatar
d*g
18
我的可以。你的ITOUCH是不是最新的一代呀。如果不是升级OS,应该可以。
avatar
wy
19
it is insane.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: I think they just wanted to be consistent
: but 30% is a little too much
: some subcription service may not have 30% margin
: but let's be honest
: this is bad only for third party developer and media
: the terms are very pro-consumer and of course pro-Apple
:
: is

avatar
d*0
20
你可以统计一下,在windows里面,屏幕上哪个角落最难摸到

【在 w****y 的大作中提到】
: 关掉T400s multitouch LCD,摸过地方很干净,没摸过的有落灰。
: 所以,我觉得相反,不摸的地方才会现脏。

avatar
h*y
21
不是最新的一代
不过已经升级到最新的OS了。。。

【在 d****g 的大作中提到】
: 我的可以。你的ITOUCH是不是最新的一代呀。如果不是升级OS,应该可以。
avatar
l*o
22
I assume cancellation is easier than traditional too. probably just click a
few buttons. traditional often requires phone call. such as Real Superpass.

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: why you think it is good for consumer?
: that means consumer need to pay more every month for the content.
: apple need to lower this percentage for rsubscription service surcharge.

avatar
a*y
23
哪一点?
使用in-app subscription的话,交钱给苹果不算Insane吧
毕竟用别人商店,别人就要提成是很合理的。百分之多少的话,倒是可以negotiate一
下。

【在 wy 的大作中提到】
: it is insane.
avatar
wy
24
30% part a. it will be passed to the consumer

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: 哪一点?
: 使用in-app subscription的话,交钱给苹果不算Insane吧
: 毕竟用别人商店,别人就要提成是很合理的。百分之多少的话,倒是可以negotiate一
: 下。

avatar
a*y
25
我觉得不会。
因为这些公司不敢涨价,因为没人会买。
倒是像一个保证自家content有很高竞争力的手短。因为很多公司会因为30%交了无利可
图而退出向iOS用户出售subscription的市场。
或者他们就必须转向HTML5 apps,必须绕开iOS SDK和App Store。
所谓Walled garden。
这个也无可厚非。虽然HTML5 apps还不够强大,但是至少还是有可能给用户非App
Store的选择的。随着iOS设备越发强大,HTML5 apps还是能做得比较好的。
应该说是苹果准备推TV, Movie, Music streaming subscription了。

【在 wy 的大作中提到】
: 30% part a. it will be passed to the consumer
avatar
wy
26
zan真有烟酒啊

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得不会。
: 因为这些公司不敢涨价,因为没人会买。
: 倒是像一个保证自家content有很高竞争力的手短。因为很多公司会因为30%交了无利可
: 图而退出向iOS用户出售subscription的市场。
: 或者他们就必须转向HTML5 apps,必须绕开iOS SDK和App Store。
: 所谓Walled garden。
: 这个也无可厚非。虽然HTML5 apps还不够强大,但是至少还是有可能给用户非App
: Store的选择的。随着iOS设备越发强大,HTML5 apps还是能做得比较好的。
: 应该说是苹果准备推TV, Movie, Music streaming subscription了。

avatar
m*e
27

you
Convenience is moot when there is no content because the providers/
distributors cannot afford it.
It's money grab, pure and simple.
I am not sure Apple has 100% rights. But even if they did, it doesn't mean
this is a wise move. Pretty insanely greedy, I would say.
I am anxious to see how Amazon and Netflix would respond.
is
out

【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: convienience
: and publisher wont get your personal data and sell them for ads or send you
: junk mails.
: Apple has 100% rights to ask for split for stuff sold through App Store.
: just like you can't just put your stuff in walmart and sell it without
: paying walmart.
: The only issue is that Apple demands no bypassing App Store. if your app is
: selling subscription, you have to include in-app subscription along with out
: -of-app paying mechanism. apple is betting customers would prefer in-app
: subscription. and they will take the cut.

avatar
a*y
28
they pull out
that is not all that bad
it is a free market
we will see who will win who will lose
amazon and netflix can make money wherever they can

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: you
: Convenience is moot when there is no content because the providers/
: distributors cannot afford it.
: It's money grab, pure and simple.
: I am not sure Apple has 100% rights. But even if they did, it doesn't mean
: this is a wise move. Pretty insanely greedy, I would say.
: I am anxious to see how Amazon and Netflix would respond.
: is
: out

avatar
m*e
29

not all bad for whom?
Sure. What's your point? Are you threatening content providers who want to
pull out?
and them too?

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: they pull out
: that is not all that bad
: it is a free market
: we will see who will win who will lose
: amazon and netflix can make money wherever they can

avatar
a*y
30
you are already out of your mind.
You probably will never buy iPhone anyway
why do you even care?

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: not all bad for whom?
: Sure. What's your point? Are you threatening content providers who want to
: pull out?
: and them too?

avatar
m*e
31

I care because unfortunately I have to share the same world which is
populated with stupid idiots.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: you are already out of your mind.
: You probably will never buy iPhone anyway
: why do you even care?

avatar
k*k
32
真烂,等着看他垮掉的那天,虽然可能还要等几年.........
avatar
a*y
33
something we can agree on.

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: I care because unfortunately I have to share the same world which is
: populated with stupid idiots.

avatar
p*y
34
哎, 人民被apple蹂躏还要说apple好话。
脑残啊脑残。
Just look at what facebook does. Zygna becomes billion dollar company just
because of facebook. And facebook becomes even stronger because of Zygna.
This is the trend. Apple is going to die because it's against the trend, no
matter how strong it is now.
Read this book. http://www.amazon.com/Facebook-Effect-Inside-Company-Connecting/dp/1439102120/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1297913886&sr=1-1
This is the business model more and more internet company follow.

you
is
out

【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: convienience
: and publisher wont get your personal data and sell them for ads or send you
: junk mails.
: Apple has 100% rights to ask for split for stuff sold through App Store.
: just like you can't just put your stuff in walmart and sell it without
: paying walmart.
: The only issue is that Apple demands no bypassing App Store. if your app is
: selling subscription, you have to include in-app subscription along with out
: -of-app paying mechanism. apple is betting customers would prefer in-app
: subscription. and they will take the cut.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。