c*c
2 楼
硬件有硬伤? which one?
l*l
3 楼
说来听听,没时间看评测。。。
F*e
9 楼
can you paste the link? thanks~~
H*n
12 楼
等版上有人上手体验后再决定入不入
实在不行让人从国内带个note II过来
实在不行让人从国内带个note II过来
w*u
17 楼
299的价格真的不需要指望好的做工。。。。
c*c
20 楼
"电池+天线设计不合理,很容易没信号,而且很容易使天线寿命短"
都没开始卖,这么快就有结论了? 不知道radio寿命怎么变短的,芯片烧掉?
都没开始卖,这么快就有结论了? 不知道radio寿命怎么变短的,芯片烧掉?
g*g
21 楼
看评测续航似乎是差了点,但没听说有天线问题。
w*c
22 楼
谣言吧,根据呢?
s*5
23 楼
这就好比是花了个找婊子的价钱,还非得要求对方是处女,你到底是要闹哪样啊
r*e
24 楼
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/nexus-4-battery-shot-reve
我老几天前就说过了,貌似没人注意啊.....
我老几天前就说过了,貌似没人注意啊.....
v*e
27 楼
刚才在ATT玩了一会LG optimus G,感觉发热很厉害
c*w
28 楼
就是这篇帖子。。刚才忙去了。。。
【在 r***e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.xda-developers.com/android/nexus-4-battery-shot-reve
: 我老几天前就说过了,貌似没人注意啊.....
【在 r***e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.xda-developers.com/android/nexus-4-battery-shot-reve
: 我老几天前就说过了,貌似没人注意啊.....
c*c
31 楼
看起来Spring Antenna Connections 应该是common practice吧, 要是大部分手机都
没发生用着用着就没信号的问题,那也就没啥大问题了
没发生用着用着就没信号的问题,那也就没啥大问题了
h*r
34 楼
我看得reviw就说通话质量特好。
d*c
40 楼
看了原帖,这不叫review,这是地下室读图员,根据一张照片能扯出来这么多。
底下comments里有不同意见。
底下comments里有不同意见。
d*c
41 楼
gideonMorrison • 4 days ago
−
I like this post by Phil, from the forums:
"Hi
I'm pretty sure LG knows what they are doing, and the article just doesn't
make much sense.
Comments in the article about the Bolted in battery
This phone is not suppose to have an end user replaceable battery, so any
criticism about the robustness of design relating to having to change the
battery many times is just silly. The battery is lithium polymer and will
last longer than other standard lithium types, and for most people the phone
will be replaced long before they notice any reduction in battery capacity.
Spring antenna connections
This is a pretty standard way of doing things these days for antennas. The
article comments about loss of tension and snapped plastic tabs, well the
tabs may only get snapped if the battery is replaced by someone who isn't
sure what they are doing, and I'll repeat what I said above, the phone isn't
designed to have a user replaceable battery. As for the back warping, they'
ve overlooked the fact that glued across the back is a sheet of glass, so
any warping will crack the glass long before problems with signals are seen.
Lack of impact zones
I doubt any phone has impact zones built in, there simply isn't the room to
waste space doing this, and lets face it, any drop bad enough to dislodge
the internal components will have likely shattered the screen, especially
given the trend for edge to edge glass. If any phone is dropped it either
survives or breaks depending on how lucky or unlucky you are.
Tape used instead of structure and shielding
This doesn't make any sense at all. The phone doesn't require servicing and
isn't design to be maintained by the end user so what does it matter what is
used inside the phone? Tape is used all the time in devices, mostly it is
simply used during manufacture to secure wires to aid construction.
As for tape on the battery, that tape has nothing to do with the battery, it
is simply holding in place the co-ax antenna connection wire to ensure it
doesn't float free and get trapped during assembly. The battery itself is
held in place by adhesive tape underneath it and by the fact it is
sandwiched in by the back cover.
Perhaps if this phone was designed by NASA to be used in a space mission
where a replacement would be difficult to obtain, then yes we would expect
all the components to be easily serviceable, but then it would be 5 times
the size and 10 times the cost of this phone, and no one would want it!
The whole article is just silly. LG will have spent a shed load of money on
R&D and testing, Google will have done the same as their name is attached to
it, and then someone thinks they can tell LG how to do it better from
looking at a few pictures?
Regards
Phil"
−
I like this post by Phil, from the forums:
"Hi
I'm pretty sure LG knows what they are doing, and the article just doesn't
make much sense.
Comments in the article about the Bolted in battery
This phone is not suppose to have an end user replaceable battery, so any
criticism about the robustness of design relating to having to change the
battery many times is just silly. The battery is lithium polymer and will
last longer than other standard lithium types, and for most people the phone
will be replaced long before they notice any reduction in battery capacity.
Spring antenna connections
This is a pretty standard way of doing things these days for antennas. The
article comments about loss of tension and snapped plastic tabs, well the
tabs may only get snapped if the battery is replaced by someone who isn't
sure what they are doing, and I'll repeat what I said above, the phone isn't
designed to have a user replaceable battery. As for the back warping, they'
ve overlooked the fact that glued across the back is a sheet of glass, so
any warping will crack the glass long before problems with signals are seen.
Lack of impact zones
I doubt any phone has impact zones built in, there simply isn't the room to
waste space doing this, and lets face it, any drop bad enough to dislodge
the internal components will have likely shattered the screen, especially
given the trend for edge to edge glass. If any phone is dropped it either
survives or breaks depending on how lucky or unlucky you are.
Tape used instead of structure and shielding
This doesn't make any sense at all. The phone doesn't require servicing and
isn't design to be maintained by the end user so what does it matter what is
used inside the phone? Tape is used all the time in devices, mostly it is
simply used during manufacture to secure wires to aid construction.
As for tape on the battery, that tape has nothing to do with the battery, it
is simply holding in place the co-ax antenna connection wire to ensure it
doesn't float free and get trapped during assembly. The battery itself is
held in place by adhesive tape underneath it and by the fact it is
sandwiched in by the back cover.
Perhaps if this phone was designed by NASA to be used in a space mission
where a replacement would be difficult to obtain, then yes we would expect
all the components to be easily serviceable, but then it would be 5 times
the size and 10 times the cost of this phone, and no one would want it!
The whole article is just silly. LG will have spent a shed load of money on
R&D and testing, Google will have done the same as their name is attached to
it, and then someone thinks they can tell LG how to do it better from
looking at a few pictures?
Regards
Phil"
d*c
42 楼
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/12m8zc/nexus_4_battery
总之这个review是个joke
总之这个review是个joke
s*3
43 楼
嗯,还是等等小白鼠们的实验结果吧
相关阅读
Nokia 635 在国内能导航吗?你们的海豚浏览器能取消全屏模式吗?各位怎么从国内打美国电话?有把酷狗下载的歌分享到微信的吗?1+1 and LG G3比较,G3有明显的短板吗?看了三星的 S6 发布会,很有欲望想买一个。其实三爽那个定价表一点不过分Cricket 新手机rebate陷阱,大家注意 (转载)iphone scam? (转载)Sprint LG G2 免费解锁GSM,世界上最简单的方法目前沒看出弯曲屏的优点。5寸屏,不可换电池h2o refill card 问题ANDROID OS 和屏幕一样耗电23%,不正常吧?.avi格式视频和.srt格式字幕放哪个盒子可以完美播放回国腐败,求手机推荐。纠结,买不买果六+在讲UlTmobile 要等拿到early termination fee再关吗?Samsung galaxy s4 wi fi信号比较弱