目前为止temple run2运行最流畅的是N7# PDA - 掌中宝
L*t
1 楼
公司律师不给看全文的内容，只是给摘抄了下边的东西让准备着。他们到十月中旬才处
理我的 case，ｄｅａｄｌｉｎｅ 是 １２／０２。我也读了很多版上的经典贴，不
过还是希望大家再给点建议，谢谢！具体背景在后边。
Contribution 不过是不是 EB1b 硬伤啊？
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, either individually or on
a panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied
academic field.
This criterion has been met.
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
(in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic
field
This criterion has been met.
The beneficiary has met at least two criteria.
However, in each case, the totality of the evidence must establish that the
beneficiary is:
• Recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field
specified in the petition.
A review of the record does not establish that this has been met.
The evidence provided shows that the beneficiary has acted as a judge of the
work of others in their academic field. However, further documentary
evidence is needed to establish that the judging establishes that the
beneficiary is recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic
field specified in the petition. To assist in determining that the judging
establishes that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as
outstanding in their academic field, you may submit:
• Documentary evidence showing that the act of judging was based on
the beneficiary's outstanding recognition in their academic field. Examples
include but are not limited to:
1. Serving in an editorial position(s) for recognized journals in the
beneficiary's academic field;
2. Reviewing a large number of articles in the academic field; and
3. Serving as an expert judge, panelist, reviewer, etc. for selection of
recognized prizes and/or memberships in the academic field.
• Any other relevant evidence.
The Service acknowledges receipt of evidence regarding the beneficiary's
publications. Now, please submit evidence of additional publications if
applicable and updated documentation of the citation record regarding the
beneficiary's publications including printouts of search results from such
websites as SciFmder and Google Scholar, just to name two. Please note that
any such printout must contain the title, authors, and publication
information for both the cited and citing article. Search results that do
not contain such details will not be considered evidence.
You may submit any available additional documentary evidence and/or further
documentary evidence to demonstrate the significance of evidence already in
the record.
Please note, the evidence must:
• Have been in existence as of the date the petition was filed; and
• Demonstrate that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as
outstanding in the academic field specified
发信人: LGviolet (LGviolet), 信区: Immigration
标 题: NSC EB1b RFE 求助 （附背景）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 16 16:00:35 2011, 美东)
EB1b: 06/16/2011 TSC, 然后 transfer 到 NSC
RFE: 09/08/2011(email) 今天收到 mail
因为公司的制度，我不能看这封信，但是公司律师在电话里大概给我读了一下。最后的
总结段落是，过了两条，但是最后要 international recognition.
背景：
PhD Physics, top 5 US school
Scientist at Down Jones large company
Paper: 7 (3 PRL, 3 APL) citation 44 (initial) now 60 (24 countries)
Reference: 7 （4 US， 1 Japan, 2 Europe）
Conference: 10
Invited talks at APS March meeting and SPIE+Optics
Chair one session at a large international conference
Review: 17
Outstanding dissertation award from APS (claimed, but not pass)
因为 miscommunication，最后律师把 APS Membership 和 Sigma Xi 放进去了，都怪
我自己犯了愚蠢的错误。
请问：在准备 international recognition 的时候，还要去理那些没有过的 claim 吗
？好比 award，membership。可以重新用曾用过的证据去 support international
recognition 吗？
比较担心的是，contribution 没过,judging 和 authorship 过了
急求大家的建议，谢谢！！
理我的 case，ｄｅａｄｌｉｎｅ 是 １２／０２。我也读了很多版上的经典贴，不
过还是希望大家再给点建议，谢谢！具体背景在后边。
Contribution 不过是不是 EB1b 硬伤啊？
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, either individually or on
a panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied
academic field.
This criterion has been met.
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
(in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic
field
This criterion has been met.
The beneficiary has met at least two criteria.
However, in each case, the totality of the evidence must establish that the
beneficiary is:
• Recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field
specified in the petition.
A review of the record does not establish that this has been met.
The evidence provided shows that the beneficiary has acted as a judge of the
work of others in their academic field. However, further documentary
evidence is needed to establish that the judging establishes that the
beneficiary is recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic
field specified in the petition. To assist in determining that the judging
establishes that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as
outstanding in their academic field, you may submit:
• Documentary evidence showing that the act of judging was based on
the beneficiary's outstanding recognition in their academic field. Examples
include but are not limited to:
1. Serving in an editorial position(s) for recognized journals in the
beneficiary's academic field;
2. Reviewing a large number of articles in the academic field; and
3. Serving as an expert judge, panelist, reviewer, etc. for selection of
recognized prizes and/or memberships in the academic field.
• Any other relevant evidence.
The Service acknowledges receipt of evidence regarding the beneficiary's
publications. Now, please submit evidence of additional publications if
applicable and updated documentation of the citation record regarding the
beneficiary's publications including printouts of search results from such
websites as SciFmder and Google Scholar, just to name two. Please note that
any such printout must contain the title, authors, and publication
information for both the cited and citing article. Search results that do
not contain such details will not be considered evidence.
You may submit any available additional documentary evidence and/or further
documentary evidence to demonstrate the significance of evidence already in
the record.
Please note, the evidence must:
• Have been in existence as of the date the petition was filed; and
• Demonstrate that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as
outstanding in the academic field specified
发信人: LGviolet (LGviolet), 信区: Immigration
标 题: NSC EB1b RFE 求助 （附背景）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 16 16:00:35 2011, 美东)
EB1b: 06/16/2011 TSC, 然后 transfer 到 NSC
RFE: 09/08/2011(email) 今天收到 mail
因为公司的制度，我不能看这封信，但是公司律师在电话里大概给我读了一下。最后的
总结段落是，过了两条，但是最后要 international recognition.
背景：
PhD Physics, top 5 US school
Scientist at Down Jones large company
Paper: 7 (3 PRL, 3 APL) citation 44 (initial) now 60 (24 countries)
Reference: 7 （4 US， 1 Japan, 2 Europe）
Conference: 10
Invited talks at APS March meeting and SPIE+Optics
Chair one session at a large international conference
Review: 17
Outstanding dissertation award from APS (claimed, but not pass)
因为 miscommunication，最后律师把 APS Membership 和 Sigma Xi 放进去了，都怪
我自己犯了愚蠢的错误。
请问：在准备 international recognition 的时候，还要去理那些没有过的 claim 吗
？好比 award，membership。可以重新用曾用过的证据去 support international
recognition 吗？
比较担心的是，contribution 没过,judging 和 authorship 过了
急求大家的建议，谢谢！！
