avatar
如果苹果烂了# PDA - 掌中宝
C*U
1
#include
#include
#include
#define MAX 10000
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
std::vector numbers1;
std::vector numbers2;
int k = atoi(argv[3]);
if(argc < 4)
std::cout << "we need 2 files and a number." << std::endl;
std::cout << "we need find " << k << "th number" << std::endl;
std::cout << "reading first array of numbers ..." << std::endl;
std::ifstream f1(argv[1]);
if(!f1){
std::cout << "cannot open the file of first array of numbers ...
" <
< std::endl;
exit(-1);
}
int i = 0;
double num;
while(!f1.eof()){
f1 >> num;
numbers1.push_back(num);
i++;
}
f1.close();
std::cout << "reading second array of numbers ..." << std::endl;
std::ifstream f2(argv[2]);
if(!f2){
std::cout << "cannot open the file of second array of numbers
... "
<< std::endl;
exit(-1);
}
i = 0;
while(!f2.eof()){
f2 >> num;
numbers2.push_back(num);
i++;
}
f2.close();

if(k > numbers1.size() + numbers2.size()){
std::cout << "there are no " << k << "th number..." <<
std::endl;
exit(-1);
}
numbers1.push_back(MAX);
numbers2.push_back(MAX);
int s, j, t;
if(k - 2 > numbers1.size() - 1){
s = numbers1.size() -1;
t = k - 2 - s;
j = k / 2 + k % 2;
}
else{
s = k - 2, t = 0;
j = k / 2 + k % 2;
}

while(numbers1[s] > numbers2[t + 1] || numbers2[t] > numbers1[s +
1]){
if(numbers1[s] < numbers2[t]){
if(t <= 0)
break;
else {
if(s + j >= numbers1.size() - 1)
j = j / 2 + j % 2;
else{
s = s + j;
t = t - j;
j = j / 2 + j % 2;
}
}
}
else if(numbers1[s] == numbers2[t])
break;
else {
if(s <= 0)
break;
else {
if(t + j >= numbers2.size() - 1)
j = j / 2 + j % 2;
else{
s = s - j;
t = t + j;
j = j / 2 + j % 2;
}
}
}
}
std::cout << ((numbers1[s] > numbers2[t]) ? numbers1[s] :
numbers2[t]) <
< std::endl;
return 0;
}
avatar
b*e
2
rfe内容惨不忍睹!
个人情况如下:
美国soso学校PhD (Computational chemistry&Biophysics),现一所较top medical
school作postdoc。文章一作5篇(4篇英文,一偏JACS IF8),2作1篇。他引30+。
Invited book chapter 1 篇。审稿1篇(现增为5篇,全英文, IF2-5)。
决定找律师!先咨询了一个朋友极力推荐的律师,比较悲观,刚开始建议重办,但我不
希望浪费1年排期,才答应response。另外咨询了一个律师,比较乐观,认为是最近流
行的generic rfe,我case不是很弱,比较自信。
总而言之,感觉辛苦了半年准备的材料,VO全盘否定,非常痛苦。在这里想听听大家管
我case难易以及律师选择的看法。
如下是rfe大部内容,铺天盖地...
You must establish that the national interest would be served if you were
required to obtain a labor certificate for the proposed employment. ... The
evidence of record does not establish (i) how you have influenced the field
as a whole apart from your current and previous employers; (ii) how you
contributed more than others in the field; and (iii) how you stand apart
from the other in the field as been able to benefit the national interest.
You must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest would be
adversely affected if a labor cert were required. You must demonstrate that
it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive your
employer of your services by making the position available to US workers.
You must establish that you have a past record of specific prior achievement
with some degree of influence on the field as a whole. Your previous
influence on the field as a whole must justify projections of future benefit
to the national interest. You must establish your ability to serve the
national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of
others in the field.
You must establish that your skills or background are unique and innovative
and serve the national interest. If you possess any special skills,
knowledge or abilities that could not be articulated on an application for
labor certification, you must submit evidence demonstrate these special
skills, knowledge or abilities.
...Even though you have published articles in the field and had other
researchers to acknowledge the importance of your work in the field, the
totality of the evidence of record does not establish that your skills,
knowledge or abilities could not be articulated on an application for labor
certification.
avatar
g*5
3
this comment...
avatar
i*a
4
国内风向会改买什么 ni?
有什么其他手机又贵又落后又封闭可替代的?
avatar
C*U
5
自己顶
有大牛帮忙看看
对不对 有啥需要改进的?

【在 C***U 的大作中提到】
: #include
: #include
: #include
: #define MAX 10000
: int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
: std::vector numbers1;
: std::vector numbers2;
: int k = atoi(argv[3]);
: if(argc < 4)
: std::cout << "we need 2 files and a number." << std::endl;

avatar
s*n
6
bless
avatar
g*1
7
那必须Lumia啊,又贵又落后又封闭

【在 i****a 的大作中提到】
: 国内风向会改买什么 ni?
: 有什么其他手机又贵又落后又封闭可替代的?

avatar
l*c
8
我也觉得这个是个generic的RFE。
重新组织所有的材料再加上这段等待时间内新的材料。如果你自己弄不来的话,最好找
个口碑好的律师帮你。你的条件申请NIW没有问题。

【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: rfe内容惨不忍睹!
: 个人情况如下:
: 美国soso学校PhD (Computational chemistry&Biophysics),现一所较top medical
: school作postdoc。文章一作5篇(4篇英文,一偏JACS IF8),2作1篇。他引30+。
: Invited book chapter 1 篇。审稿1篇(现增为5篇,全英文, IF2-5)。
: 决定找律师!先咨询了一个朋友极力推荐的律师,比较悲观,刚开始建议重办,但我不
: 希望浪费1年排期,才答应response。另外咨询了一个律师,比较乐观,认为是最近流
: 行的generic rfe,我case不是很弱,比较自信。
: 总而言之,感觉辛苦了半年准备的材料,VO全盘否定,非常痛苦。在这里想听听大家管
: 我case难易以及律师选择的看法。

avatar
b*e
9
本人在Houston,能推荐几个比较好的律师吗?

【在 l******c 的大作中提到】
: 我也觉得这个是个generic的RFE。
: 重新组织所有的材料再加上这段等待时间内新的材料。如果你自己弄不来的话,最好找
: 个口碑好的律师帮你。你的条件申请NIW没有问题。

avatar
e*r
10
最近引用增加了没?
我觉得这个条件,niw应该不算弱了.
重新组织一下材料,在多找几封推荐信,突出一下重点.
从rfe看,貌似你的申请没怎么强调你多牛.把你那jacs好好吹吹.再挖掘一下引用
有没有被highlighted的

【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: rfe内容惨不忍睹!
: 个人情况如下:
: 美国soso学校PhD (Computational chemistry&Biophysics),现一所较top medical
: school作postdoc。文章一作5篇(4篇英文,一偏JACS IF8),2作1篇。他引30+。
: Invited book chapter 1 篇。审稿1篇(现增为5篇,全英文, IF2-5)。
: 决定找律师!先咨询了一个朋友极力推荐的律师,比较悲观,刚开始建议重办,但我不
: 希望浪费1年排期,才答应response。另外咨询了一个律师,比较乐观,认为是最近流
: 行的generic rfe,我case不是很弱,比较自信。
: 总而言之,感觉辛苦了半年准备的材料,VO全盘否定,非常痛苦。在这里想听听大家管
: 我case难易以及律师选择的看法。

avatar
p*1
11
I'd respond RFE to try to win, even if you re-apply you still need to
consider RFE's questions ,right?
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。