西雅图的PDAer们能否考虑一下回家的事情？# PDA - 掌中宝
j*u
1 楼
对于EB1B类申请的一些个人建议
看到网上很多朋友要求大家给评估自己的CASE, 很多热心的网友在回复时会说EB1A弱些
,EB1B ENOUGH.
其实按照律师给出的统计数字来看, EB1A通过率不到50%,而EB1B类的通过率在90%. 刹
一看,的确是EB1B 类很容易通过. 可是既然不是100%的通过率.就有10%的NOID率.而
且这90%中也有被要求RFE后通过的.我想每个申请人都不希望自己被RFE,当然更不希望
RFE后被NOID. 可是看到近期网上一些RFE和NOID的CASE,好些是EB1B的,就想写些什么给
大家,希望对大家有用, 能最大程度上好好准备自己的材料,避免RFE.
IO审每个案子是有依据的,这个除了他们多年的经验,还有就是POLICY MEMORANDUM(
December, 22,2010)
EB1B 的定义是: Evaluating Evidence Submitted in Support of a Petition for an
Outstanding Professor or Researcher. 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3) describes the
evidence that must be submitted in support of an I-140 petition for an
outstanding professor or researcher. The evidence that must be provided in
support of E12, outstanding professor or researcher petitions must
demonstrate that the alien is recognized internationally as outstanding in
the academic field specified in the petition
所以说对于EB1B, OUTSTANDING+INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED就是IO审核的核心所在.
下面我只针对老三样+媒体报道说一说.
一.Publication:
1. Determine whether the published material was about the alien’s work.
The published material should be about the alien’s work in the field, not
just about his or her employer or another organization that he or she is
associated with. Articles that cite the alien’s work as one of multiple
footnotes or endnotes are not generally “about” the alien’s work.
2. Determine whether the publication qualifies as a professional publication
.
Evidence of published material in professional publications about the alien
should establish the circulation (online or in print) and that the intended
audience of the publication, as well as the title, date, and author of the
material.
从这一段的定义,可以看IO看的不仅是文章的数量还有质量.
一作文章当然重要, (英文文章应该说比中文文章更有说服力___因为要
INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED)
文章发表的杂志是否INTERNATIONAL, 读者群是否INTERNATIONAL, 能证明这些还不行,
为什么?因为别忘记了还得是ＯＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．所以尽管１Ｂ不需要证明是Ｓ
ＭＡＬＬ ＰＥＲＣＥＲＴＡＧＥ，但是你也得是ＯＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．所以说你
的文章引用是不是在本专业ＴＯＰ，你的杂志是不是ＴＯＰ，这都很重要．你有没有文
章被选做ＣＯＶＥＲ，或者ＦＥＡＴＵＲＥ ＡＲＴＩＣＬＥ．如果有，那你一定是Ｏ
ＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ对吧．因为就每个杂志而言，这种被选已经证明了你的ＯＵＴＳ
ＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．
二作,三作,N作文章算不算? 当然算,但是前提是你必须有一定数量的一作文章.要不然
怎么能说明你的OUTSTANDING.
一定要有大量的引用吗? 当然引用越多越好,但是引用很大并不能保证你一定过. 为什
么?因为一专业不一样． 二是如果你的引用大多来自中文文章，大多来自一个国家，
你怎么证明给ＩＯ你的ＩＮＴＥＲＮＡＴＩＯＮＡＬ？所以重要的一点是在引用上，要
证明来自多少国家，多少ＩＮＳＴＩＴＵＴＥ，多少公司？多少基金？而且这些ＩＮＳ
ＴＩＴＵＴＥ，公司的地位？如果很多是国家级的实验室，当然就什么都不用多说了．
ＡＢＳＴＲＡＣＴ， ＰＲＥＳＥＮＴＡＴＩＯＮ算不算？ 严格的意义上说，不算．
但是你可以放在这里，加强一下，或者说还有人问你写信要文章，ＰＯＳＴＥＲ等等．
二 对于Review:
定义是：Determine whether the alien has participated either individually or
on a panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied
academic field.
The petitioner must show that the alien has not only been invited to judge
the work of others, but also that the alien actually participated in the
judging of the work of others in the same or allied academic field
所以说这一点上不是说有人邀请你审稿，而且必须是你还审了稿．别忘记了好多被ＲＦ
Ｅ的例子，这一点ＩＯ说是ＲＯＵＴＩＮＥ工作．所以你得证明你审的杂志有ＩＮＴＥ
ＲＮＡＴＩＯＮＡＬ，读者群ＩＮＴＥＲＡＮＴＩＯＮＡＬ．这样还不行？因为你是Ｏ
ＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．所以你得证明，你来审稿不是ＲＯＵＴＩＮＥ，而是你的国际
影响力．这就要靠ＥＤＩＴＯＲ的信来支持．说明他们选审稿人，都是这个ＦＩＥＬＤ
的ＥＸＰＥＲＴ，只有ＴＯＰ ＮＡＭＥ才可以被选．并且他们的杂志是你这个领域的
ＴＯＰ．
如果你还担当了ＥＤＩＴＯＲＡＬ ＢＯＡＲＤ的角色，当然是非常有用的．很有说服
力．你可以看看这个ＥＤＩＴＯＲＡＬ ＢＯＡＲＤ里有没有牛人，都来自什么牛机构．
还有一点如果你审了基金，当然更要提了，比如你审过政府部门什么ＤＯＥ等等的基金
．多有说服力．
三Contribution:
定义: Determine whether the alien has made original scientific or scholarly
research contributions to the academic field.
As a reminder, this regulation does not require that the alien’s
contributions be of “major significance.” That said, the description of
this type of evidence in the regulation does not simply require original
research, but an original scientific or scholarly research contribution.
Moreover, the description of this type of evidence in the regulation
requires that the contribution must be “to the academic field” rather than
an individual laboratory or institution.
看看,所谓这条,就是你的研究不仅是原创,而且还要有贡献.光是原创没有用.而且对于
EB1B这一条一定要过,必须过.
想一想你有没有参与大项目(国际项目,项目有多少国家参与),你研究的成果对此项目
有什么影响.你的成果有没有被应用.你的项目是不是美国或者世界现在最TOP的项目,比
如:新能源等.如果没有你的参与与研究是否这个项目就进行不了.你的研究可以解决当
前什么问题.你有没有被特邀请做过报告.
当然还要有推荐信,注意是INTERANTIONAL,所以国家分布越广越好, 有美国,欧洲,中国,
日本等等. 这下可以证明INTERANTIONAL了吧.还不行,还要看你推荐信的内容.
看看定义:
Since scholarly work tends to be specialized and to be expressed in arcane
and specialized language, USCIS officers should take into account the
probative analysis that experts in the field may provide in opinion letters
regarding the alien’s contributions in order to assist in giving an
assessment of the alien’s original contributions. That said, not all expert
letters provide such analysis. Letters that specifically articulate how the
alien has contributed to the field and its impact on subsequent work add
value. Letters that lack specifics and simply use hyperbolic language do not
add value, and are not considered to be probative evidence that may form
the basis for meeting this criterion.
总结一下: 推荐信最好用大家能看懂的语言,比如你说一个专业术语,我们看不懂,当然
你可以形象地举例.比如打个比方,这样IO就看明白了.当然也不能太明白,要不然IO会感
觉你研究的东东没有什么了不起. 推荐信还要注意的是:一定要有依据,说你是
OUTSTANDING必须要以事实为依据.空口号只能给你带来负作用. 比说推荐人说你的一个
成果很OUTSTANDING,最好换成,他的这个成果解决了什么问题.如果没有他的研究,现在
会如何?
独立推荐人,(最好是不认识PERSONALLY, BUT,一定要对你早有耳闻,比如你的研究,
PAPER,PRESENTATION.)就象姚明不一定大家都见过,但是都知道.对吧.就这个意思.
四:Media report
定义是: The description of this type of evidence in the regulation provides
that the focus must be on the alien's receipt of the major prizes or awards,
as opposed to his or her employer's receipt of the prizes or awards.
The criteria used to grant the major prizes or awards; and,
• The number of prize recipients or awardees as well as any
limitations on competitors (a prize or award limited to competitors from a
single institution, for example, may not rise to the level of major).
对于EB1B, 可以是说你的研究成果的报道,但是最好有你的名字. 如果是公司或者学校
的名字,就不要CLAIM了. 但是可以放在CONTRIBUTION里加强. 而且报道要
INTERNATIONAL, 比如有不同国家的杂志报道了.或者网站等.
建议大家在准备材料期间,多看看RFE的例子,因为IO会这样问他们,也会这样来审核.我很喜欢这个例子,因为IO的信也有,对策也有.并且老三样全部被RFE,很有借鉴作用.大家多用挑剔的眼光来准备自己的材料.多按IO的思路来苛刻在对待自己。
http://www.mitbbssg.com/bbsann2/life.faq/Immigration/eb1/experi
好了,就先这些吧.希望对大家有一些帮助.远离RFE,早日变绿.
看到网上很多朋友要求大家给评估自己的CASE, 很多热心的网友在回复时会说EB1A弱些
,EB1B ENOUGH.
其实按照律师给出的统计数字来看, EB1A通过率不到50%,而EB1B类的通过率在90%. 刹
一看,的确是EB1B 类很容易通过. 可是既然不是100%的通过率.就有10%的NOID率.而
且这90%中也有被要求RFE后通过的.我想每个申请人都不希望自己被RFE,当然更不希望
RFE后被NOID. 可是看到近期网上一些RFE和NOID的CASE,好些是EB1B的,就想写些什么给
大家,希望对大家有用, 能最大程度上好好准备自己的材料,避免RFE.
IO审每个案子是有依据的,这个除了他们多年的经验,还有就是POLICY MEMORANDUM(
December, 22,2010)
EB1B 的定义是: Evaluating Evidence Submitted in Support of a Petition for an
Outstanding Professor or Researcher. 8 CFR 204.5(i)(3) describes the
evidence that must be submitted in support of an I-140 petition for an
outstanding professor or researcher. The evidence that must be provided in
support of E12, outstanding professor or researcher petitions must
demonstrate that the alien is recognized internationally as outstanding in
the academic field specified in the petition
所以说对于EB1B, OUTSTANDING+INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED就是IO审核的核心所在.
下面我只针对老三样+媒体报道说一说.
一.Publication:
1. Determine whether the published material was about the alien’s work.
The published material should be about the alien’s work in the field, not
just about his or her employer or another organization that he or she is
associated with. Articles that cite the alien’s work as one of multiple
footnotes or endnotes are not generally “about” the alien’s work.
2. Determine whether the publication qualifies as a professional publication
.
Evidence of published material in professional publications about the alien
should establish the circulation (online or in print) and that the intended
audience of the publication, as well as the title, date, and author of the
material.
从这一段的定义,可以看IO看的不仅是文章的数量还有质量.
一作文章当然重要, (英文文章应该说比中文文章更有说服力___因为要
INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED)
文章发表的杂志是否INTERNATIONAL, 读者群是否INTERNATIONAL, 能证明这些还不行,
为什么?因为别忘记了还得是ＯＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．所以尽管１Ｂ不需要证明是Ｓ
ＭＡＬＬ ＰＥＲＣＥＲＴＡＧＥ，但是你也得是ＯＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．所以说你
的文章引用是不是在本专业ＴＯＰ，你的杂志是不是ＴＯＰ，这都很重要．你有没有文
章被选做ＣＯＶＥＲ，或者ＦＥＡＴＵＲＥ ＡＲＴＩＣＬＥ．如果有，那你一定是Ｏ
ＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ对吧．因为就每个杂志而言，这种被选已经证明了你的ＯＵＴＳ
ＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．
二作,三作,N作文章算不算? 当然算,但是前提是你必须有一定数量的一作文章.要不然
怎么能说明你的OUTSTANDING.
一定要有大量的引用吗? 当然引用越多越好,但是引用很大并不能保证你一定过. 为什
么?因为一专业不一样． 二是如果你的引用大多来自中文文章，大多来自一个国家，
你怎么证明给ＩＯ你的ＩＮＴＥＲＮＡＴＩＯＮＡＬ？所以重要的一点是在引用上，要
证明来自多少国家，多少ＩＮＳＴＩＴＵＴＥ，多少公司？多少基金？而且这些ＩＮＳ
ＴＩＴＵＴＥ，公司的地位？如果很多是国家级的实验室，当然就什么都不用多说了．
ＡＢＳＴＲＡＣＴ， ＰＲＥＳＥＮＴＡＴＩＯＮ算不算？ 严格的意义上说，不算．
但是你可以放在这里，加强一下，或者说还有人问你写信要文章，ＰＯＳＴＥＲ等等．
二 对于Review:
定义是：Determine whether the alien has participated either individually or
on a panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied
academic field.
The petitioner must show that the alien has not only been invited to judge
the work of others, but also that the alien actually participated in the
judging of the work of others in the same or allied academic field
所以说这一点上不是说有人邀请你审稿，而且必须是你还审了稿．别忘记了好多被ＲＦ
Ｅ的例子，这一点ＩＯ说是ＲＯＵＴＩＮＥ工作．所以你得证明你审的杂志有ＩＮＴＥ
ＲＮＡＴＩＯＮＡＬ，读者群ＩＮＴＥＲＡＮＴＩＯＮＡＬ．这样还不行？因为你是Ｏ
ＵＴＳＴＡＮＤＩＮＧ．所以你得证明，你来审稿不是ＲＯＵＴＩＮＥ，而是你的国际
影响力．这就要靠ＥＤＩＴＯＲ的信来支持．说明他们选审稿人，都是这个ＦＩＥＬＤ
的ＥＸＰＥＲＴ，只有ＴＯＰ ＮＡＭＥ才可以被选．并且他们的杂志是你这个领域的
ＴＯＰ．
如果你还担当了ＥＤＩＴＯＲＡＬ ＢＯＡＲＤ的角色，当然是非常有用的．很有说服
力．你可以看看这个ＥＤＩＴＯＲＡＬ ＢＯＡＲＤ里有没有牛人，都来自什么牛机构．
还有一点如果你审了基金，当然更要提了，比如你审过政府部门什么ＤＯＥ等等的基金
．多有说服力．
三Contribution:
定义: Determine whether the alien has made original scientific or scholarly
research contributions to the academic field.
As a reminder, this regulation does not require that the alien’s
contributions be of “major significance.” That said, the description of
this type of evidence in the regulation does not simply require original
research, but an original scientific or scholarly research contribution.
Moreover, the description of this type of evidence in the regulation
requires that the contribution must be “to the academic field” rather than
an individual laboratory or institution.
看看,所谓这条,就是你的研究不仅是原创,而且还要有贡献.光是原创没有用.而且对于
EB1B这一条一定要过,必须过.
想一想你有没有参与大项目(国际项目,项目有多少国家参与),你研究的成果对此项目
有什么影响.你的成果有没有被应用.你的项目是不是美国或者世界现在最TOP的项目,比
如:新能源等.如果没有你的参与与研究是否这个项目就进行不了.你的研究可以解决当
前什么问题.你有没有被特邀请做过报告.
当然还要有推荐信,注意是INTERANTIONAL,所以国家分布越广越好, 有美国,欧洲,中国,
日本等等. 这下可以证明INTERANTIONAL了吧.还不行,还要看你推荐信的内容.
看看定义:
Since scholarly work tends to be specialized and to be expressed in arcane
and specialized language, USCIS officers should take into account the
probative analysis that experts in the field may provide in opinion letters
regarding the alien’s contributions in order to assist in giving an
assessment of the alien’s original contributions. That said, not all expert
letters provide such analysis. Letters that specifically articulate how the
alien has contributed to the field and its impact on subsequent work add
value. Letters that lack specifics and simply use hyperbolic language do not
add value, and are not considered to be probative evidence that may form
the basis for meeting this criterion.
总结一下: 推荐信最好用大家能看懂的语言,比如你说一个专业术语,我们看不懂,当然
你可以形象地举例.比如打个比方,这样IO就看明白了.当然也不能太明白,要不然IO会感
觉你研究的东东没有什么了不起. 推荐信还要注意的是:一定要有依据,说你是
OUTSTANDING必须要以事实为依据.空口号只能给你带来负作用. 比说推荐人说你的一个
成果很OUTSTANDING,最好换成,他的这个成果解决了什么问题.如果没有他的研究,现在
会如何?
独立推荐人,(最好是不认识PERSONALLY, BUT,一定要对你早有耳闻,比如你的研究,
PAPER,PRESENTATION.)就象姚明不一定大家都见过,但是都知道.对吧.就这个意思.
四:Media report
定义是: The description of this type of evidence in the regulation provides
that the focus must be on the alien's receipt of the major prizes or awards,
as opposed to his or her employer's receipt of the prizes or awards.
The criteria used to grant the major prizes or awards; and,
• The number of prize recipients or awardees as well as any
limitations on competitors (a prize or award limited to competitors from a
single institution, for example, may not rise to the level of major).
对于EB1B, 可以是说你的研究成果的报道,但是最好有你的名字. 如果是公司或者学校
的名字,就不要CLAIM了. 但是可以放在CONTRIBUTION里加强. 而且报道要
INTERNATIONAL, 比如有不同国家的杂志报道了.或者网站等.
建议大家在准备材料期间,多看看RFE的例子,因为IO会这样问他们,也会这样来审核.我很喜欢这个例子,因为IO的信也有,对策也有.并且老三样全部被RFE,很有借鉴作用.大家多用挑剔的眼光来准备自己的材料.多按IO的思路来苛刻在对待自己。
http://www.mitbbssg.com/bbsann2/life.faq/Immigration/eb1/experi
好了,就先这些吧.希望对大家有一些帮助.远离RFE,早日变绿.
