Redian新闻
>
手机屏幕分辨率要达到多少,才能眼睛靠多近都看不见颗粒?
avatar
手机屏幕分辨率要达到多少,才能眼睛靠多近都看不见颗粒?# PDA - 掌中宝
d*y
1
有两篇,请有兴趣且能审稿的站内信联系。
1:题目:Modeling and simulation an anti-reflective coating of ZnO and ZnS
for silicon solar cells using Silvaco software
摘要
In this paper simulated single layer anti-reflective coating on silicon
solar cell that based on the refractive index limit of silicon dioxide (SiO2
), zinc oxide (ZnO) and zinc sulphide (ZnS)
are presented. Two simulations of ZnO and ZnS coating were simulated to
compare with SiO2
anti-reflective coating on silicon solar cell surface. These simulations
carried out with variable
coating thickness that is 50 nm, 60 nm, 70 nm and 80 nm by using ATLAS
simulator. From
the simulation obtained, it was found that the value of Voc and Jsc are 397.
69 mV and 15.646
nA/µm2, respectively, from silicon solar cell with 0.05 µm SiO2
coating. For the fill factor
and power conversion efficiency of this solar cell is 0.758 and 4.72 % were
computed. As for
the ARC simulation, the spectral response of ZnO and ZnS coating was
increased around 600
and 700 nm, respectively, which are capable of reducing the reflectivity
over a wide range of
wavelengths compared to SiO2 increased around 0.4 µm wavelength. This
can be concluded that
when the refractive index value is higher, the available photocurrent can be
higher in wide range
wavelength and more reducing the reflectivity. For the ARC analysis, the
spectral response graph
was plotted to evaluate the external quantum efficiency (EQE). From the
results obtained the
maximum percentage of EQE, which nearly 0.9999 % is on 60 – 80 nm thickness
ZnO coating.
Meanwhile the EQE of ZnS is increasing around 600 – 800 nm of broad range
wavelength. And
this mean the ZnS coating could perform more efficiency on wide range of
wavelength compared
to SiO2 and ZnO ARC.
2. 题目: Power Quality Improvement by Intelligent Harmonic Regenerative
Filters for Nonlinear Load Power Systems
摘要
The area of Power Quality Issues and Remedial Measures has received
considerable attention from the Power Utilities, Power Consumers and Power
Equipment Manufacturers over the last decade. Large-scale use of bulk power
Thyristor Converters and Industrial Electronic Equipment resulted in
waveform pollution at all levels in the Power Systems from mid-eighties
onwards.
The issue became more serious with the proliferation of non-linear loads (
rectifiers, arc furnaces, variable speed drives, UPS, computer load,
printers, domestic electronic equipment etc.) in the Industrial, Commercial
and Residential sectors in the past decade. These loads, as a rule, draw
nonsinusoidal currents from the supply and lead to voltage distortion and
related system problems. With the wide spread use of Power Electronics at
all levels, the polluting loads became spread out system wide and Power
Quality Improvement Measures concentrated at a few bulk power points turned
out to be insufficient to mitigate system wide problems.
This paper demonstrates the power quality issues behind the uneven switching
of two types of converters and mitigation technology implemented to solve
it. For having better operation of power utilities intelligent techniques
are applied and performances are compared with the simulated results.
avatar
n*s
2
乔帮主的视网膜屏就是扯淡。眼睛近一点看,颗粒尽管小还是很明显。
达到多少才真的分辨不出?
avatar
m*q
3
docy 第二我可以审, 第一个可能够呛。如果可以的话,请发到 m****[email protected]。 谢谢了!过了给你双黄包子!
avatar
d*e
4
和分辨率没关系,看到眼睛瞎了就可以看不见颗粒了
avatar
a*m
5
没那么严重。看到。。。手机屏幕不亮了就可以了。。。。

【在 d*****e 的大作中提到】
: 和分辨率没关系,看到眼睛瞎了就可以看不见颗粒了
avatar
g*z
6
估计要达到光的波长级别

【在 n**s 的大作中提到】
: 乔帮主的视网膜屏就是扯淡。眼睛近一点看,颗粒尽管小还是很明显。
: 达到多少才真的分辨不出?

avatar
i*l
7
应该受瑞丽极限限制吧, theta = 1.22 (lambda/Diameter of eye pupil)
算上绿光波长 550纳米,亮光条件下瞳孔直径3毫米,估算下分辨角度要比1'还要小。
考虑正常人眼(非近视)聚焦能力不会短于10厘米,那么可以得出颗粒大小估计是2微
米,几倍于光波长量级吧
avatar
m*s
8
1平方毫米达到5000X5000像素,即可。

乔帮主的视网膜屏就是扯淡。眼睛近一点看,颗粒尽管小还是很明显。达到多少才真的
分辨不出?

【在 n**s 的大作中提到】
: 乔帮主的视网膜屏就是扯淡。眼睛近一点看,颗粒尽管小还是很明显。
: 达到多少才真的分辨不出?

avatar
x*2
9
别听他们瞎扯, 他们其实不懂。ppi 要达到250。nn【在 nvbs (水波淼淼)的大作中提
到:】n:乔帮主的视网膜屏就是扯淡。眼睛近一点看,颗粒尽管小还是很明显。n:n
:达到多少才真的分辨不出?n:n……nn--n[发自未名空间Android客户端]
avatar
b*t
10
4K就差不多
越高越好,来者不拒
avatar
l*e
11
为什么看现实世界就看不到像素呢?
avatar
z*b
12
你什么眼睛?佩服

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.8

【在 n**s 的大作中提到】
: 乔帮主的视网膜屏就是扯淡。眼睛近一点看,颗粒尽管小还是很明显。
: 达到多少才真的分辨不出?

avatar
q*c
13
这是胡扯,这是视网膜上成像没有颗粒。
问题是视网膜分辨率不是无限的,只要视网膜上颗粒小于视网膜的分辨率就行了。
哪里需要微米,简直搞笑 - 你肉眼能看清微米大小的颗粒?显微镜那。

【在 i******l 的大作中提到】
: 应该受瑞丽极限限制吧, theta = 1.22 (lambda/Diameter of eye pupil)
: 算上绿光波长 550纳米,亮光条件下瞳孔直径3毫米,估算下分辨角度要比1'还要小。
: 考虑正常人眼(非近视)聚焦能力不会短于10厘米,那么可以得出颗粒大小估计是2微
: 米,几倍于光波长量级吧

avatar
s*s
14
你这个是上了苹果的当了,真的以为果果是所谓的retina了。
果果用的是视角1分计算的,这个数据有年头了。现在认为的
分辨极限是0.35分,至少也要用0.6,也就是说600dpi差不多了,
最好要到900dpi,翻三倍。

【在 q*c 的大作中提到】
: 这是胡扯,这是视网膜上成像没有颗粒。
: 问题是视网膜分辨率不是无限的,只要视网膜上颗粒小于视网膜的分辨率就行了。
: 哪里需要微米,简直搞笑 - 你肉眼能看清微米大小的颗粒?显微镜那。

avatar
s*s
15
差不多。4k不仔细看就没有颗粒了,最高做到6k就是极限了。
iphone那个retina,颗粒太明显了

【在 b****t 的大作中提到】
: 4K就差不多
: 越高越好,来者不拒

avatar
c*9
16
很多时候,很多人,到了一定程度,这个要求其实跟眼睛已经没有关系了,只跟心理有
关。
avatar
l*p
17
颗粒200nm以下就看不到了

【在 s******s 的大作中提到】
: 差不多。4k不仔细看就没有颗粒了,最高做到6k就是极限了。
: iphone那个retina,颗粒太明显了

avatar
n*s
18
我是度数比较深的近视。把眼镜摘掉,靠近屏幕看就可以。
正常视力的恐怕不一定看的出来。

【在 z****b 的大作中提到】
: 你什么眼睛?佩服
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.8

avatar
n*s
19
600不知道行不行。
反正以前的激打,dpi是1200, 再怎么看,也看不出颗粒。

【在 s******s 的大作中提到】
: 差不多。4k不仔细看就没有颗粒了,最高做到6k就是极限了。
: iphone那个retina,颗粒太明显了

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。