NEXUS 7 来信息，QQ 这些都很响，在设置里关掉了声音# PDA - 掌中宝
W*B
1 楼
问这个stall到底管用不，是不是移民局真的就先暂时不给劳模们发卡了
Federal judge stalls Obama's executive action on immigration
HOUSTON — A federal judge temporarily blocked President Barack Obama's
executive action on immigration Monday, giving a coalition of 26 states time
to pursue a lawsuit that aims to permanently stop the orders.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen's decision puts on hold Obama's orders that
could spare as many as five million people who are in the U.S. illegally
from deportation.
The federal government is expected to appeal the ruling to the 5th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. The Justice Department had no
immediate comment late Monday night.
Hanen's decision will not have any immediate effect because the first of
Obama's orders — to expand a program that protects young immigrants from
deportation if they were brought to the U.S. illegally as children — is not
set to start taking effect until Feb. 18. The other major part of Obama's
order, which extends deportation protections to parents of U.S. citizens and
permanent residents who have been in the country for some years, is not
expected to begin until May 19.
In a 2013 ruling in a separate case, Hanen suggested the Homeland Security
Department should be arresting parents living in the U.S. illegally who
induce their children to cross the border illegally.
The coalition, led by Texas and made up of mostly conservative states in the
South and Midwest, argues that Obama has violated the "Take Care Clause" of
the U.S. Constitution, which they say limits the scope of presidential
power. They also say the order will force increased investment in law
enforcement, health care and education.
In their request for the injunction, the coalition said it was necessary
because it would be "difficult or impossible to undo the President's
lawlessness after the Defendants start granting applications for deferred
action."
Congressional Republicans have vowed to block Obama's actions on immigration
by cutting off Homeland Security Department spending for the program.
Earlier this year, the Republican-controlled House passed a $39.7 billion
spending bill to fund the department through the end of the budget year, but
attached language to undo Obama's executive actions. The fate of that House
-passed bill is unclear as Republicans in the Senate are six votes shy of
the 60-vote majority needed to advance most legislation.
The White House has said Obama's executive order is not out of legal bounds
and that the U.S. Supreme Court and Congress have said federal officials can
set priorities in enforcing immigration laws. Past U.S. Supreme Court
decisions have granted immigration officials "broad discretion" on
deportation matters.
Others supporting Obama's executive order include a group of 12 mostly
liberal states, including Washington and California, as well as the District
of Columbia. They filed a motion with Hanen in support of Obama, arguing
the directives will substantially benefit states and will further the public
interest.
A group of law enforcement officials, including the Major Cities Chiefs
Association and more than 20 police chiefs and sheriffs from across the
country, also filed a motion in support, arguing the executive action will
improve public safety by encouraging cooperation between police and
individuals with concerns about their immigration status.
Federal judge stalls Obama's executive action on immigration
HOUSTON — A federal judge temporarily blocked President Barack Obama's
executive action on immigration Monday, giving a coalition of 26 states time
to pursue a lawsuit that aims to permanently stop the orders.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen's decision puts on hold Obama's orders that
could spare as many as five million people who are in the U.S. illegally
from deportation.
The federal government is expected to appeal the ruling to the 5th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. The Justice Department had no
immediate comment late Monday night.
Hanen's decision will not have any immediate effect because the first of
Obama's orders — to expand a program that protects young immigrants from
deportation if they were brought to the U.S. illegally as children — is not
set to start taking effect until Feb. 18. The other major part of Obama's
order, which extends deportation protections to parents of U.S. citizens and
permanent residents who have been in the country for some years, is not
expected to begin until May 19.
In a 2013 ruling in a separate case, Hanen suggested the Homeland Security
Department should be arresting parents living in the U.S. illegally who
induce their children to cross the border illegally.
The coalition, led by Texas and made up of mostly conservative states in the
South and Midwest, argues that Obama has violated the "Take Care Clause" of
the U.S. Constitution, which they say limits the scope of presidential
power. They also say the order will force increased investment in law
enforcement, health care and education.
In their request for the injunction, the coalition said it was necessary
because it would be "difficult or impossible to undo the President's
lawlessness after the Defendants start granting applications for deferred
action."
Congressional Republicans have vowed to block Obama's actions on immigration
by cutting off Homeland Security Department spending for the program.
Earlier this year, the Republican-controlled House passed a $39.7 billion
spending bill to fund the department through the end of the budget year, but
attached language to undo Obama's executive actions. The fate of that House
-passed bill is unclear as Republicans in the Senate are six votes shy of
the 60-vote majority needed to advance most legislation.
The White House has said Obama's executive order is not out of legal bounds
and that the U.S. Supreme Court and Congress have said federal officials can
set priorities in enforcing immigration laws. Past U.S. Supreme Court
decisions have granted immigration officials "broad discretion" on
deportation matters.
Others supporting Obama's executive order include a group of 12 mostly
liberal states, including Washington and California, as well as the District
of Columbia. They filed a motion with Hanen in support of Obama, arguing
the directives will substantially benefit states and will further the public
interest.
A group of law enforcement officials, including the Major Cities Chiefs
Association and more than 20 police chiefs and sheriffs from across the
country, also filed a motion in support, arguing the executive action will
improve public safety by encouraging cooperation between police and
individuals with concerns about their immigration status.
