Redian新闻
>
Intel 来了 -- Quark ( x86 compatible)
avatar
Intel 来了 -- Quark ( x86 compatible)# PDA - 掌中宝
C*g
1
早收到EAD/AP的combo卡了,今天收到信3月27号USCIS local office面试,本来定的3月25和3月31要去两趟加拿大,刚才查了查,发现31号加拿大好像是去不成了,除非能27号的面试当场拿到551stamp。那25号去加拿大会不会有危险回不来呢?有没有明白的给说说,谢谢了
avatar
x*o
2
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/09/intel-aim
Intel aims another barrel at ARM with synthesizable, ultra-low-power Quark
At its Intel Developer Forum event in San Francisco today, Intel announced a
new range of low-power processors.
With the Atom project, Intel set its sights on the smartphone and tablet
markets. Its major competition in these spaces came from ARM, with its
Cortex A series of processors. Compared to Intel's desktop and laptop
processors of the time, ARM's performance was pathetic, but its processors
did something that Intel's couldn't: they drew just a watt or two of power,
often less.
With the Saltwell range of Atom processors, Intel cracked that first nut. It
had a processor that could go in a smartphone, offering decent power
consumption and good (and sometimes better than good) performance. Since its
introduction, the Saltwell family has been surpassed by various ARM parts,
but Intel should regain performance competitiveness with its Silvermont
range, rolling out over the next six months.
But Atom and the A-series only go so low. If you want to embed processors
everywhere—from the smartwatch on your wrist to a heart monitoring patch to
keep track of your health—you need to aim lower than the A-series. ARM has
such a line: the M-series.
Intel didn't. But it will be much closer soon: Quark. Just as Atom makes
Intel's desktop parts look big and hot, Quark makes Atom look big and hot.
The Quark system-on-chip will be one fifth the size of Atom and use one
tenth the power of Atom. Intel didn't provide too many other details about
Quark's specifications. The main things we know are that it will be x86
compatible and initial parts will be built on a 32nm process.
What's striking about Quark, however, is the way that Intel is selling it.
ARM is extremely flexible. The ARM company itself doesn't make any
processors; it just sells instruction sets and processor designs. Third
parties can license these and customize them as they see fit. Instruction
set licensees can design the entire chip themselves; licensees of ARM's off-
the-shelf designs can use them as-is or customize them in various ways. The
designs can be tweaked to improve performance or power usage, and they can
have other pieces integrated, such as custom blocks for mobile networking,
telephony, graphics, and so on.
Intel's designs, in contrast, have been take-it-or-leave-it affairs. If you
buy Atom from Intel, you get the GPU and system-on-chip components that
Intel chooses, and if you want to add extra capabilities, they'll have to be
separate chips.
Quark changes that. The Quark design is fully synthesizable, with extension
points to allow customers to integrate their own functional blocks onto
Quark SoCs. Intel CEO Brian Krzanich also said that although Intel would
prefer that Quark chips (including those with custom, third-party blocks) be
built on Intel's own fabs, Quark will in time be buildable by third parties.
This marks a big change for Intel. Together with its custom fab scheme—the
company is selling manufacturing capacity to third parties who want to build
chips—Intel is changing its approach to the microchip industry. What it's
doing isn't innovative, per se—other companies have offered fabrication
services (e.g. TSMC and AMD-spin off Global Foundries) and processor designs
(e.g. ARM) for a long time. But Intel has made its riches from being fully
integrated: selling Intel-designed chips, built on Intel's production lines.
This approach made sense for the PC market, but it's a much harder sell in
the embedded space, where design customization is not just common but
expected. Intel isn't as flexible as ARM yet, but with Quark, it's taking a
big step closer.
avatar
p*e
3
不懂帮顶。EAD/AP在面试后不能用了?
avatar
p*m
4
win9手机闪亮登场
avatar
T*y
5
不懂帮顶。
Why do you need an interview? It seems that AP should work until you get
your green card though.

3月25和3月31要去两趟加拿大,刚才查了查,发现31号加拿大好像是去不成了,除非能
27号的面试当场拿到551stamp。那25号去加拿大会不会有危险回不来呢?有没有明白的
给说说,谢谢了

【在 C*******g 的大作中提到】
: 早收到EAD/AP的combo卡了,今天收到信3月27号USCIS local office面试,本来定的3月25和3月31要去两趟加拿大,刚才查了查,发现31号加拿大好像是去不成了,除非能27号的面试当场拿到551stamp。那25号去加拿大会不会有危险回不来呢?有没有明白的给说说,谢谢了
avatar
u*d
6
64位的吧?
intel现在还有不是64位的CPU没有?
这么说,微软又领先果子和狗了。
avatar
C*g
7
不知道为什么要面试,我太太没指纹,不知道跟这个有没有关系
我在网上看人说面试有可能当场approve绿卡,但是没法当场拿到,同时ead/ap就作废
了......

【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: 不懂帮顶。
: Why do you need an interview? It seems that AP should work until you get
: your green card though.
:
: 3月25和3月31要去两趟加拿大,刚才查了查,发现31号加拿大好像是去不成了,除非能
: 27号的面试当场拿到551stamp。那25号去加拿大会不会有危险回不来呢?有没有明白的
: 给说说,谢谢了

avatar
h*r
8
这个估计会用在tablet上。
很可能win8和android都有。
avatar
b*e
9
当然有关系,而且是很大的关系。如果没指纹,你的面试第一步就是聊天,把你和你老
婆140+485上的问题问一遍。(这是必须的例行公事)而且你很可
能还是无法一次就做成拿到551的。 如果我感觉不错的话,你应该会被要求你老婆住处
地policedepartment开具的无犯罪纪录。 所以为了尽量节省时间,我建议你在面试前
就把这个手续给做了,他谈话最后让你再去办个police report时,你就直接拿出来给
他,也许可以免掉第二次面试。 please keep us posted.

【在 C*******g 的大作中提到】
: 不知道为什么要面试,我太太没指纹,不知道跟这个有没有关系
: 我在网上看人说面试有可能当场approve绿卡,但是没法当场拿到,同时ead/ap就作废
: 了......

avatar
m*u
10
明显是为了可穿戴设备
avatar
C*g
11
谢谢回复,可是我想知道的是面试前后我能不能拿着ap出美国再回来,尤其是之前。你
说的无犯罪记录的事我们知道

【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: 当然有关系,而且是很大的关系。如果没指纹,你的面试第一步就是聊天,把你和你老
: 婆140+485上的问题问一遍。(这是必须的例行公事)而且你很可
: 能还是无法一次就做成拿到551的。 如果我感觉不错的话,你应该会被要求你老婆住处
: 地policedepartment开具的无犯罪纪录。 所以为了尽量节省时间,我建议你在面试前
: 就把这个手续给做了,他谈话最后让你再去办个police report时,你就直接拿出来给
: 他,也许可以免掉第二次面试。 please keep us posted.

avatar
G*h
12
肯定比atom慢至少一个数量级

【在 m****u 的大作中提到】
: 明显是为了可穿戴设备
avatar
b*e
13
没什么问题,你们的ap是有效的。

【在 C*******g 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢回复,可是我想知道的是面试前后我能不能拿着ap出美国再回来,尤其是之前。你
: 说的无犯罪记录的事我们知道

avatar
r*n
14
这是穿戴设备用的
avatar
p*e
15
大蜜真是个热心人啊

【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: 没什么问题,你们的ap是有效的。
avatar
C*g
16
谢谢啦

【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: 没什么问题,你们的ap是有效的。
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。