W*e
2 楼
请板上著名律师办的。
背景：
化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
以下是NOID的内容：
Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
is one of that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field
of endeavor’ or ‘sustained national or international acclaim’. The
evidence must set the beneficiary apart from others in his field.
While the record reflects the beneficiary has co-authored 14 scholarly
articles with a citation following, USCIS cannot conclude that the
beneficiary’s publication record is consistent with sustained national or
international acclaim nor can we state that the beneficiary is among that
small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor. When compared to
the accomplishments of some of the beneficiary ‘s expert witnesses; i.e, in
addition to pubishing several scientific papers in peer review journals,
professor…, has ‘more than 30 patents’, while professor.. has published 7
books; it appears that the highest level of beneficiary’s field is far
above the level he has attained.
As discussed, USCIS has evaluated the evidence and determined that the
evidence does not establish that beneficiary is an individual of
extraordinary ability in accordance with 203(b)(1)(A)(i)of the INA.
Additionally, as required by (b)(1)(A)(ii) of INA, the beneficiary must seek
to enter the US to continue work in the claimed area of expertise. Although
no offer of employment is required for this classification, it must be
established that the beneficiary is coming to the US to continue work in
their field of expertise.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary is coming to the US to continue
work in his field of expertise. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy
this requirement includes, but is not limited to:
1, letters from current or prospective employers;
2, employment contracts; or
3, a statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how he intends to
continue work in the US.
Furthermore, as request by (b)(1)(A)(iii) of the INA, the beneficiary’s
entry into the US must substantially benefit prospectively by US.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary’s entry will substantially
benefit prospectively the US. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy this
requirement includes, but is not limited to:
1, letters from current or prospective employers, or individuals who work in
the beneficiary’s field;
2, other evidence explaining how the beneficiary’s work will be
advantageous and of use to the interests of the US on a national level; or
3, a statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how he will
substantially benefit prospectively the US.
Lastly, pursuant to section 291 of INA, whenever any person makes an
application for an immigration benefit, they shall bear the burden of proof
to establish eligibility. Accordingly, the petitioner must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence, in other works, that it is more like than not
, that the beneficiary is fully qualify for the benefit sought. See Matter
of E-M- 20 I. &N. Dec. 77 (Comm. 1989). After a careful review and analysis
of all evidence within the record, USCIS finds that the petitioner has not
established eligibility for the benefit sought.
The petitioner is hereby notified that it is the NOID….
Director….0106
背景：
化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
以下是NOID的内容：
Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
is one of that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field
of endeavor’ or ‘sustained national or international acclaim’. The
evidence must set the beneficiary apart from others in his field.
While the record reflects the beneficiary has co-authored 14 scholarly
articles with a citation following, USCIS cannot conclude that the
beneficiary’s publication record is consistent with sustained national or
international acclaim nor can we state that the beneficiary is among that
small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor. When compared to
the accomplishments of some of the beneficiary ‘s expert witnesses; i.e, in
addition to pubishing several scientific papers in peer review journals,
professor…, has ‘more than 30 patents’, while professor.. has published 7
books; it appears that the highest level of beneficiary’s field is far
above the level he has attained.
As discussed, USCIS has evaluated the evidence and determined that the
evidence does not establish that beneficiary is an individual of
extraordinary ability in accordance with 203(b)(1)(A)(i)of the INA.
Additionally, as required by (b)(1)(A)(ii) of INA, the beneficiary must seek
to enter the US to continue work in the claimed area of expertise. Although
no offer of employment is required for this classification, it must be
established that the beneficiary is coming to the US to continue work in
their field of expertise.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary is coming to the US to continue
work in his field of expertise. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy
this requirement includes, but is not limited to:
1, letters from current or prospective employers;
2, employment contracts; or
3, a statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how he intends to
continue work in the US.
Furthermore, as request by (b)(1)(A)(iii) of the INA, the beneficiary’s
entry into the US must substantially benefit prospectively by US.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary’s entry will substantially
benefit prospectively the US. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy this
requirement includes, but is not limited to:
1, letters from current or prospective employers, or individuals who work in
the beneficiary’s field;
2, other evidence explaining how the beneficiary’s work will be
advantageous and of use to the interests of the US on a national level; or
3, a statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how he will
substantially benefit prospectively the US.
Lastly, pursuant to section 291 of INA, whenever any person makes an
application for an immigration benefit, they shall bear the burden of proof
to establish eligibility. Accordingly, the petitioner must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence, in other works, that it is more like than not
, that the beneficiary is fully qualify for the benefit sought. See Matter
of E-M- 20 I. &N. Dec. 77 (Comm. 1989). After a careful review and analysis
of all evidence within the record, USCIS finds that the petitioner has not
established eligibility for the benefit sought.
The petitioner is hereby notified that it is the NOID….
Director….0106
s*i
3 楼
小方自带的那个貌似没法关闭自带字幕，更新几次了都没修好。虽然快播出事后小方还
有更新，不过频率越来越低，而且现在基本都买不到小方了，所以感觉靠他们更新软件
有点悬。不知是否有达人可以推荐一下播放app？之前试过xmbc，不过好像有中文显示
乱码问题。
有更新，不过频率越来越低，而且现在基本都买不到小方了，所以感觉靠他们更新软件
有点悬。不知是否有达人可以推荐一下播放app？之前试过xmbc，不过好像有中文显示
乱码问题。
d*1
4 楼
Indirect Signature只要有个活人就能收
就是不能扔门口
direct sig要本人签名
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
: Indirect Signature和direct sig有什么区别，indirect便宜不少啊，大家都用那个的
: ？
就是不能扔门口
direct sig要本人签名
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
: Indirect Signature和direct sig有什么区别，indirect便宜不少啊，大家都用那个的
: ？
o*e
5 楼
bless
S*t
6 楼
你在哪里看到的"Indirect Signature"? Fedex应该没有这个服务了吧。
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
: Indirect Signature和direct sig有什么区别，indirect便宜不少啊，大家都用那个的
: ？
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
: Indirect Signature和direct sig有什么区别，indirect便宜不少啊，大家都用那个的
: ？
E*S
7 楼
review的部分是不是可以找editor写信证明你特牛才找你review的，
下面要求提供的材料应该比较好弄吧，
和其他推荐人比。。。这个不知道咋回答，
呼唤大牛们来解读一下吧。。。
下面要求提供的材料应该比较好弄吧，
和其他推荐人比。。。这个不知道咋回答，
呼唤大牛们来解读一下吧。。。
b*n
8 楼
Home Delivery有
【在 S********t 的大作中提到】
: 你在哪里看到的"Indirect Signature"? Fedex应该没有这个服务了吧。
【在 S********t 的大作中提到】
: 你在哪里看到的"Indirect Signature"? Fedex应该没有这个服务了吧。
K*N
9 楼
bless顶
R*g
10 楼
有的啊 我不选home也有啊
【在 S********t 的大作中提到】
: 你在哪里看到的"Indirect Signature"? Fedex应该没有这个服务了吧。
l*u
11 楼
bless，呼唤大牛帮忙解读
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
R*g
12 楼
那选这个indirect也没事的吧？
【在 d*****1 的大作中提到】
: Indirect Signature只要有个活人就能收
: 就是不能扔门口
: direct sig要本人签名
c*t
13 楼
bless
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
S*t
14 楼
where? fedex.com我看没有这个东西呀。难道是account不一样?
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
:
: 那选这个indirect也没事的吧？
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
:
: 那选这个indirect也没事的吧？
c*8
15 楼
bless！
b*e
16 楼
indirect应该是说 收件人 可以在 FEDEX第一次投递后 没收到 的 DOOR TAG上 签名
这样下一次 FEDEX可以直接放门口了
DIRECT估计一定要人当面签名
这样下一次 FEDEX可以直接放门口了
DIRECT估计一定要人当面签名
t*e
17 楼
bless!
R*g
18 楼
shiprush 里面有的吧
【在 S********t 的大作中提到】
: where? fedex.com我看没有这个东西呀。难道是account不一样?
z*b
19 楼
1）journal挑选review的标准， 网页打印标准
编辑的推荐信(因为你牛才选你做review的)
2) 指出那些professor发那么多paper，那么多patent是大group
结果，平均到每个人头上还没你多，再找几个推荐信强调一些
你牛
by the way,你的citation是多少啊，找几个cite你paper的人
再写写推荐信呗
3) 剩下的很简单了，学校的合同，你投出去的paper/abstract来强调
你会继续在这个行业工作
bless
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
编辑的推荐信(因为你牛才选你做review的)
2) 指出那些professor发那么多paper，那么多patent是大group
结果，平均到每个人头上还没你多，再找几个推荐信强调一些
你牛
by the way,你的citation是多少啊，找几个cite你paper的人
再写写推荐信呗
3) 剩下的很简单了，学校的合同，你投出去的paper/abstract来强调
你会继续在这个行业工作
bless
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
S*t
20 楼
有不表示能work.打印出来看看再说吧。
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
:
: shiprush 里面有的吧
【在 R*g 的大作中提到】
:
: shiprush 里面有的吧
W*e
21 楼
谢谢楼上的bless 和回复。
我的citation不多， 申请的时候60-70左右。
律师催着交钱。 我不知道胜算大不大， 如果不大的话， 就不想继续下去了。 但按
zpytb 的意思， 现在暂时是不需要取消申请， 回复USCIS好一点？
我的citation不多， 申请的时候60-70左右。
律师催着交钱。 我不知道胜算大不大， 如果不大的话， 就不想继续下去了。 但按
zpytb 的意思， 现在暂时是不需要取消申请， 回复USCIS好一点？
t*c
22 楼
靠谱
名
【在 b***e 的大作中提到】
: indirect应该是说 收件人 可以在 FEDEX第一次投递后 没收到 的 DOOR TAG上 签名
: 这样下一次 FEDEX可以直接放门口了
: DIRECT估计一定要人当面签名
名
【在 b***e 的大作中提到】
: indirect应该是说 收件人 可以在 FEDEX第一次投递后 没收到 的 DOOR TAG上 签名
: 这样下一次 FEDEX可以直接放门口了
: DIRECT估计一定要人当面签名
a*e
23 楼
good approach. did not realize that the employment letter is required for
EB1A.
Good luck.
【在 z***b 的大作中提到】
: 1）journal挑选review的标准， 网页打印标准
: 编辑的推荐信(因为你牛才选你做review的)
: 2) 指出那些professor发那么多paper，那么多patent是大group
: 结果，平均到每个人头上还没你多，再找几个推荐信强调一些
: 你牛
: by the way,你的citation是多少啊，找几个cite你paper的人
: 再写写推荐信呗
: 3) 剩下的很简单了，学校的合同，你投出去的paper/abstract来强调
: 你会继续在这个行业工作
: bless
EB1A.
Good luck.
【在 z***b 的大作中提到】
: 1）journal挑选review的标准， 网页打印标准
: 编辑的推荐信(因为你牛才选你做review的)
: 2) 指出那些professor发那么多paper，那么多patent是大group
: 结果，平均到每个人头上还没你多，再找几个推荐信强调一些
: 你牛
: by the way,你的citation是多少啊，找几个cite你paper的人
: 再写写推荐信呗
: 3) 剩下的很简单了，学校的合同，你投出去的paper/abstract来强调
: 你会继续在这个行业工作
: bless
l*i
24 楼
啥驴师给你搞的啊? 简直是误事.
z*b
25 楼
你不去争取永远不知道结果
给rfe就是给你机会
bless
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢楼上的bless 和回复。
: 我的citation不多， 申请的时候60-70左右。
: 律师催着交钱。 我不知道胜算大不大， 如果不大的话， 就不想继续下去了。 但按
: zpytb 的意思， 现在暂时是不需要取消申请， 回复USCIS好一点？
给rfe就是给你机会
bless
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢楼上的bless 和回复。
: 我的citation不多， 申请的时候60-70左右。
: 律师催着交钱。 我不知道胜算大不大， 如果不大的话， 就不想继续下去了。 但按
: zpytb 的意思， 现在暂时是不需要取消申请， 回复USCIS好一点？
A*7
26 楼
bless
z*y
27 楼
bless一把
好好回复吧
好好回复吧
i*n
28 楼
还是很有希望的，不要放弃！！！！！
J*B
29 楼
bless.
W*e
30 楼
谢谢楼上的各位！
如果取消申请， 然后再寄一份， 有什么不好的结果/好一点啊？
如果取消申请， 然后再寄一份， 有什么不好的结果/好一点啊？
a*e
31 楼
RFE is another chance and you only need to answer what they asked. why waste
this opportunity?
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢楼上的各位！
: 如果取消申请， 然后再寄一份， 有什么不好的结果/好一点啊？
this opportunity?
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢楼上的各位！
: 如果取消申请， 然后再寄一份， 有什么不好的结果/好一点啊？
g*2
32 楼
bless!!
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
r*e
33 楼
Bless!!!
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
,
international
individual
【在 W*******e 的大作中提到】
: 请板上著名律师办的。
: 背景：
: 化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
: ， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
: 以下是NOID的内容：
: Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
: journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
: is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
: acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
: consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
相关阅读
atom win8 3g 10寸高清板 $399Engadget的Nexus4 review出来了看各种review nexus 4的电池都说是很悲剧ipad mini降到199就比较合理了国内用手机上facebook, 用8ssh 怎么样t999刷中文ROM？新蛋的这个$590的note2能用Tmobile的monthly4G吗？Att 的iphone 5合约机私自解锁N4 是韩货吧？ 有国货替代品吗？有些人就是观念跟不上时代今年很不爽15块升级windows 8出问题了。可以安装，不能激活。想50刀恳请版上verizon用户的朋友打个客服电话帮我unlock iphone 4s, clean esn立贴为证，苹果未来一年还是微软谷歌市值总和Nokia Drive这种情况win8是不是没安装好 (转载)TomTom for Android北美地图及安装文件下载windows phone有没有解锁的？去看了看iPad mini请问买N4用TMOBILE 30 plan 转号码的问题