Redian新闻
>
手机到期。现在买6Plus还是等6S?
avatar
手机到期。现在买6Plus还是等6S?# PDA - 掌中宝
s*h
1
【 以下文字转载自 Dreamer 讨论区 】
发信人: Dreamer (不要问我从哪里来), 信区: Dreamer
标 题: 从中部搬到加州,再也不想去南方了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jul 23 16:32:16 2014, 美东)
几个月一直来在FL, AZ,TX的office里rotating,简直要得狂躁症了,南方真摧残人,
抬眼望去净是枯焦零落黄土平原的样子,大白天根本没法徒步出门,车不停车库就要活
活烤死,而且我的还是黑色车,晚上还有八九十度以上。。。难怪赤道附近国家没几个
行的。决定正式申请常驻东部或加州的branch. 宁可冬天大雪封门也不要这样天天无名
火烧。
avatar
w*r
2
原来在一家小银行suntrust开了个账户,里面的saving账户里还有点小钱,由于离开美
国的时间太长了,很久没有登陆网上银行了,再登陆就登陆不了,总说账户和密码不对
,想网上重置密码,需要原来的debit card, 但原来的debit card也由于时间太长而失
效了,无法重置密码;手里还有支票,但钱大多在saving而非checking账户里,无法登
陆网上银行就没法转钱到checking,现在想在国内将这笔钱取出给父母,这种情况怎么
办呢,虽然去银行柜台可以办,但总不能为这点事再回趟美国吧,而且短时间内是不会
再回美国了,各位有经验的指教一下,还有没有什么办法取出钱呢?
我这种情况是不是银行账户被销户了?网上银行登陆的密码我从来就没改过,不可能错
的啊
avatar
t*l
3
Ministers insist the Government's new compulsory assessment can help schools
spot slow readers. Teachers argue the brightest pupils fail it. Here,
Jennifer Jackson gives a parent's perspective.
Word games: experts say phonics tests can create problems for children and
hold them back Alamy
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/schools/why-phonics-tests-spell-trouble-8364917.html
Parents are up in arms about the state of reading and writing in primary
schools. Not only, they claim, are teachers preparing children as young as
five and six for a new test, they are actively discouraging children from
spelling correctly and from working at their own individual pace.
But woe betide a parent who voices concern about the situation. Parents say
they are keeping silent because of an underlying fear of retaliation should
they dare utter a word. Meanwhile, literacy experts are supporting the
concerns raised about the compulsory phonics screening test that takes place
in year one.
During the test, children are asked to sound out a mixture of real and made-
up words such as "drall", "halp", "snope", "thun" and "flarp", which can be
confusing. Many children expect that what they read will make sense, so
giving them alien words out of context removes the purpose of reading, which
is to understand words on a page.
For example, some children asked to sound out a nonsense word such as "strat
" will attempt to make sense of the word and answer with the word "start".
However, this learning strategy is not recognised in the phonics test. In
some cases, children have been told by their teacher that aliens might use
these nonsense words when they come to our planet.
The literacy expert Professor Joan Freeman comments: "It is beyond belief.
Any psychologist would say this is crazy. Children should be taught to
interpret meaning. Every word is connected to a meaning. Those who designed
this test have no idea about what one does with a collection of letters on a
page."
She adds: "This isn't the way to help children understand words in context.
I'm more than horrified with the phonics screening test."
Phonics is all about the sound a letter or group of letters make, rather
than recognising whole words. Children who can already read and write a fair
number of words are being encouraged to go back to the basics, rather than
being allowed to move forward from the stage they have reached, which can be
disheartening for them.
More divisively, children who can spell words correctly are being told that
they must change the spelling to read phonetically, which can produce a word
that looks like gobbledegook or a variation on a text message written in
shorthand.
For example, one child came home and wrote the following: "Wot doo u wont
pleez" and "heer iz wun apool". He said the teacher told him he must spell
words using phonics and that he's not allowed to spell words any other way,
unless she tells him he can in class.
He felt confused. He asked his mother why his teacher wants him to write "
wot" instead of "what" and why he is not allowed to spell words correctly.
On another occasion, the child came home and said he had written the word "
come" in a sentence and that his teacher had told him to change it. He said
his teacher asked him to rewrite the word by sounding it out first. He said
he wrote "cum" and the teacher told him that was correct.
Teachers are also pressurising the more able children in the class to go
backwards, criticising them when they write words correctly and giving them
little individual attention in an effort to bring them down to the level
they want the class to work at, said one mother.
Correct spelling is not the aim of this game. The goal is to gain flying
colours in the new phonics test, which requires each child in year one to
read 40 words, half of which are made-up gobbledegook. One parent said: "
This approach not only punishes the more able children, it demoralises them,
and can create problems for children at every level. They are teaching
children to pass the test, not to read and write correctly."
David Reedy, president of the UK Literacy Association, agrees. "We may be
holding back some of our most able pupils, who are well past cracking the
alphabet code, and giving the wrong message to others.
Making children practise nonsense words and taking them back to an earlier
stage in their development can undermine them."
Parents believe that the phonics test is part of a more general attempt to
squeeze all children into a shoe that is made for one size only.
If the shoe doesn't fit, then the child risks going backwards, as attempts
are made to bring children down or up to a level that is deemed right for
all.
Children have varied abilities. They are not all the same. The phonics test,
and this approach in a wider sense, does not take this into account. Apart
from the risk of setting back the development of children, the love of the
English language, both reading and writing, has been placed on shaky terrain.
The phonics test is compulsory for all pupils in year one, who attend a
maintained school, a free school or an academy. Private schools can
introduce the test on a voluntary basis and some have done so. The test
itself involves reading, but its strictly phonics-only approach has spilt
over into writing, which appears to help teachers reinforce teaching to the
test.
Phonics is only one of a range of strategies that can be used to understand
words on a page. Furthermore, the English language is notorious for being
irregular, which means that focusing on phonics gives out the wrong message.
Not all words can be decoded, such as "one" and "was". In phonic speak, the
former would read "wun" and the latter "woz".
In the past, children were taught to read by sight. Schools have now
switched to the other extreme of the spectrum, whereby phonics has become
the only accepted way to teach reading and writing. There is little
flexibility in that. The individual has been removed from the equation. Most
children tend to use a variety of methods to read. It is the degree to
which each method is used by a child, that differs. Stifle the natural way a
child learns and their inspiration may take a knock.
Does this country really want to stifle a generation who will become part of
an increasingly competitive world? Professor Freedman and Mr Reedy both
stress that reading should be done in context, as the interpretation of
meaning is the whole purpose behind it. However, the phonics screening test
asks children to sound out words in isolation, half of which are nonsense
words, which is the opposite of what they advocate.
Reading also plays a big part in learning to write. What would you say to
the teacher who declares that there is a ceiling to what reading stage they
permit a child to go up to in reception, year one or year two, for example?
If the child reaches that ceiling, they are forced to stay on the same books
for months on end, which can be demoralising. Why should a child who is
simply good at reading be penalised?
One child was told that he was only permitted to read on certain days.
Mr Reedy says: "What sort of madness is this? I am aghast. Reading is
supposed to be pleasure. You shouldn't be told to read on certain days only."
Parents who question the teacher's gospel, do so at their own and their
child's risk. Teachers have children in their class under their control for
a significant part of each working day and they don't tend to look kindly on
parents who do anything other than offer words of praise.
In another case, a teacher was horrified that a four-year-old child was not
only able to write, but able to do so using joined-up writing. The teacher
criticised the child and tried to change his writing, as she said the child
was not allowed to do joined-up writing.
The child felt confused and told his mother. His mother asked the teacher
what was going on. The teacher said that the children don't start joined up
writing until the end of year one and are not allowed to do it before this.
She added: "I'm going to stop doing any writing with him, so that he forgets
how to write."
The idea that a child can be talented has morphed into the word "gifted",
which some use in a derogatory manner. Rather than celebrate individuals
with talent, who are after all our future, and take on board that children
develop in different ways and at different ages, some teachers appear to
punish the talented.
Parents want their children to be given the chance to move forward at their
own pace whatever level they are, with no hurdles placed in their way. If a
child is permitted to work to his or her potential, exceptional developments
can take place, which can only assist our nation in the future.
(Jennifer Jackson is a pseudonym)
Phonics the test
The Government's controversial new phonics test was taken by 600,000 six-
year-olds for the first time last summer.
Children were given 40 words – 20 real and 20 made-up – to test their
spelling and see whether they had mastered the art of phonics.
The Education Secretary, Michael Gove, believes that the test helps schools
to identify readers who are lagging behind in class, but teachers' leaders
say the brightest children are failing the test because they are trying to
turn the made-up words into real words by spelling "strom" as "storm", for
instance.
In all, 58 per cent of six-year-olds reached the pass mark of 32 – compared
with around 80 per cent of youngsters who reach the required reading
assessments at the age of seven.
Richard Garner
avatar
l*y
4
请问过来人一个问题,
材料寄出后追加PP, 多久较好, 时间是从网上填表算起,还是收到材料算起?
avatar
y*5
5
我2018年5月份一同递交了h4 extension 和ead 申请,鬼使神差的,被送到Vermont
center去了, 此中心现在还在处理2017年5月的h4 extension 申请,也就是我的还得等
一年多。但是他们ead申请已经马上处理到今年5月了,我想请教一下各位大牛,我这种
情况,他们会先处理哪个?EAD还是h4 extension?没有 h4 extension approval, 他
们会批ead吗?还是批到ead的时候,顺便把h4 extension批了?谢谢大家!
avatar
O*L
6
活捉FAZ.
avatar
k*a
7
要很用力关才可以关紧,平时基本一条线流水。
里面的有什么零件可以换吗?
谢谢!
avatar
W*d
8
好像iPhone又快更新了,值得等吗?现在bestbuy给$200 trade in. iPhone 6 is free
with 2 years renewal.
要是6S就是小改,我就不等了。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7
avatar
m*u
9
Of course 从中部搬到加州,再也不想去南方了.
avatar
J*u
10
太久没用,很有可能是银行把你账号冻结了,赶紧打电话或者到办公室去解冻
avatar
s*u
11
2 weeks would be good.
avatar
l*1
12



h4的延期难道不是跟h1一起搞得吗?
avatar
E*O
13
他不出来的时候是在闷声发大财,他上来喊的时候就是他把货出给大家的时候。
avatar
L*m
14
垫片松了, 换里头的塑料垫片很便宜,到HD 可能才几分钱,或者干脆买个新的龙头。

【在 k****a 的大作中提到】
: 要很用力关才可以关紧,平时基本一条线流水。
: 里面的有什么零件可以换吗?
: 谢谢!

avatar
z*0
15
6

free

【在 W*******d 的大作中提到】
: 好像iPhone又快更新了,值得等吗?现在bestbuy给$200 trade in. iPhone 6 is free
: with 2 years renewal.
: 要是6S就是小改,我就不等了。
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7

avatar
n*e
16
去过休斯顿几次,那个荒凉感一出机场就感受到了。低矮的房屋,贫瘠的风景,到处都
是墨西哥人的破烂社区,宽阔到夸张的高速公路,感觉一种被流放的压抑孤独感。
当地华人还喜欢吹嘘休斯顿多么适合生活,不就是房价便宜点嘛,其他方面也太差了。

【在 m*********u 的大作中提到】
: Of course 从中部搬到加州,再也不想去南方了.
avatar
h*z
17
如果真是你的账户,你怕什么?给银行打电话呗,告诉他们你不在美国,问什么答什么
,银行不会咪你的钱,
avatar
l*y
18
谢谢回复, 能够提前点吗, 合同快到期了.
avatar
D*n
19

Buy FAS when he show up

【在 E**O 的大作中提到】
: 他不出来的时候是在闷声发大财,他上来喊的时候就是他把货出给大家的时候。
avatar
v*o
20
it called washer. 关掉总水闸。把两个龙头开关卸下来,带着旧的washer去找一样的。

【在 L***m 的大作中提到】
: 垫片松了, 换里头的塑料垫片很便宜,到HD 可能才几分钱,或者干脆买个新的龙头。
avatar
W*d
21
6 plus 不好吗?

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7

【在 z****0 的大作中提到】
: 6
:
: free

avatar
s*r
22
问题是加州房价好贵,工作机会正向最贵的硅谷集中,未来数年都看不到房价回调的希
avatar
w*0
23
没区别,真的,以前版友分析直接PP可能分给那种杀手,现在看来即使nonpp也有可能
分给他,所以如果时间是问题,那你就早点PP吧,反正你的材料如果收到了,已经分配
好了IO了,所以你过几周追加没什么大区别。
avatar
u*q
24
这个笼头有20年了。批准更换。
avatar
J*i
25
6s升级了2G内存
至少内存方面能多撑个3、5年
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
avatar
u*e
26
一个问题是,io会因为15天的期限草草看材料,用rfe买时间吗?

【在 w*****0 的大作中提到】
: 没区别,真的,以前版友分析直接PP可能分给那种杀手,现在看来即使nonpp也有可能
: 分给他,所以如果时间是问题,那你就早点PP吧,反正你的材料如果收到了,已经分配
: 好了IO了,所以你过几周追加没什么大区别。

avatar
k*a
27
换新水龙头容易吗?
一把扳手和白色防漏水胶布就可以了?
谢谢!
avatar
p*m
28
6s
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
avatar
s*u
29
i actually waited only 1 week.
bless!

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢回复, 能够提前点吗, 合同快到期了.
avatar
c*o
30
把开关打开,里面的东西取出来换一个就是了
包子
avatar
p*y
31
7s

【在 p*******m 的大作中提到】
: 6s
: [发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]

avatar
w*0
32
没人知道。关键是你被分给了哪个IO
我的IO给了我RFE,但是我也知道另一个nonpp的也分给了这个IO,也给了RFE
所以这个问题,谁也不知道答案

【在 u***e 的大作中提到】
: 一个问题是,io会因为15天的期限草草看材料,用rfe买时间吗?
avatar
k*a
33
包子送上,下星期去HD看看。。。
谢谢!

【在 c****o 的大作中提到】
: 把开关打开,里面的东西取出来换一个就是了
: 包子

avatar
p*m
34

7s刚好 6s两年后

【在 p***y 的大作中提到】
: 7s
avatar
l*y
35
谢谢各位的回复,
过一周PP吧,得抓紧时间了
avatar
v*e
36
基本上是加个橡皮圈就可以了。在advanced autoparts可以找到很多橡皮圈。拆开水龙
头,把那芯子的地方就橡皮圈换新就行了。成本几块钱。如果换水龙头,那工程就大了
,找工人的话没有几百做不成。
avatar
s*u
37
bless!!!

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢各位的回复,
: 过一周PP吧,得抓紧时间了

avatar
g*y
38
需要一个plumber‘s putty
浴室的这个水龙头好像要一个这种笼头用的扳手,厨房的那个是普通的水工用的扳手

【在 k****a 的大作中提到】
: 换新水龙头容易吗?
: 一把扳手和白色防漏水胶布就可以了?
: 谢谢!

avatar
m*r
39
bless
avatar
c*o
40
嗯,一个长得很变态的扳手。
不过很多时候这个变态扳手也没用。螺丝已经羞死了,只能上点焊枪

【在 g*******y 的大作中提到】
: 需要一个plumber‘s putty
: 浴室的这个水龙头好像要一个这种笼头用的扳手,厨房的那个是普通的水工用的扳手

avatar
l*y
41
谢谢了
avatar
g*y
42
锈死了不是上WD40吗

【在 c****o 的大作中提到】
: 嗯,一个长得很变态的扳手。
: 不过很多时候这个变态扳手也没用。螺丝已经羞死了,只能上点焊枪

avatar
n*2
43
我材料收到,看网上状态是initial review就PP了,周易支票到,bless us
avatar
u*q
44
通常螺丝都是铜的,不会生锈。
用力拧就是了。不过一定要用两嘎扳手确定关岛不被拧断。
包子。

【在 c****o 的大作中提到】
: 嗯,一个长得很变态的扳手。
: 不过很多时候这个变态扳手也没用。螺丝已经羞死了,只能上点焊枪

avatar
l*y
45
谢谢, 同绿
avatar
J*S
46
换新RING吧?
不过, 新的也不贵,换新的吧。。
如果你好奇,你可以买RING,自己打开,修修试试。

【在 k****a 的大作中提到】
: 要很用力关才可以关紧,平时基本一条线流水。
: 里面的有什么零件可以换吗?
: 谢谢!

avatar
u*e
47
bless 你的rfe顺利通过

【在 w*****0 的大作中提到】
: 没人知道。关键是你被分给了哪个IO
: 我的IO给了我RFE,但是我也知道另一个nonpp的也分给了这个IO,也给了RFE
: 所以这个问题,谁也不知道答案

avatar
L*P
48
如果换水龙头,那工程就大了
给你优惠,以后你买了新的,我给你换,100刀一个,
avatar
c*o
49
水龙头如果能轻松拧下来的话,换不要太容易

【在 L**P 的大作中提到】
: 如果换水龙头,那工程就大了
: 给你优惠,以后你买了新的,我给你换,100刀一个,

avatar
L*P
50
靠,不要砸生意

【在 c****o 的大作中提到】
: 水龙头如果能轻松拧下来的话,换不要太容易
avatar
c*o
51
哦,哥错了。。。换水龙头灰常灰常难,非Pro不能搞

【在 L**P 的大作中提到】
: 靠,不要砸生意
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。