小熊猫搅局妈妈吃早饭# PhotoForum - 摄影作品
e*e
1 楼
I'm doing applied research.
I used some mathamtical tools to solve a practical problem with practical
constraints (other people solved similar problems but neglected some
important constraints).
Clearly, the mathematical tools are not my contribution. Then, my
contribution is modeling a practical problem and solving it. However, this
seems not sufficient. How should I highlight my research?
Moreover, if I want to show some technical depth of my research, is it good
to show the mathematical derivations? My concern is that the mathematical
tools are sort of standard... (like convex programming: once formulated as
convex programming, the problem is always "easy" to solve, and sometimes the
closed-form solution is available. However, it follows standard steps).
Thanks!
I used some mathamtical tools to solve a practical problem with practical
constraints (other people solved similar problems but neglected some
important constraints).
Clearly, the mathematical tools are not my contribution. Then, my
contribution is modeling a practical problem and solving it. However, this
seems not sufficient. How should I highlight my research?
Moreover, if I want to show some technical depth of my research, is it good
to show the mathematical derivations? My concern is that the mathematical
tools are sort of standard... (like convex programming: once formulated as
convex programming, the problem is always "easy" to solve, and sometimes the
closed-form solution is available. However, it follows standard steps).
Thanks!