p*e
2 楼
在PP钱寄出但没取前,I-140已批,怎么样要回那个加速的钱? 求助
a*a
3 楼
刚看到有个比较革命机的帖子。
在nex-5和gf1之间犹豫。
gf1 pancake比sony要好。
但是sony的panaroma是不是也可以?
比较犹豫sony还是因为没有标准闪光灯接口。
如果比较他们的kit zoom lens哪个成像效果会好一点?
我觉得sony上的kit zoom放上真奇怪。镜头太大机身太小。
另外还是不习惯evf........
莫非要等fuji?有点等不及了想最近有好的折扣就入手。
在nex-5和gf1之间犹豫。
gf1 pancake比sony要好。
但是sony的panaroma是不是也可以?
比较犹豫sony还是因为没有标准闪光灯接口。
如果比较他们的kit zoom lens哪个成像效果会好一点?
我觉得sony上的kit zoom放上真奇怪。镜头太大机身太小。
另外还是不习惯evf........
莫非要等fuji?有点等不及了想最近有好的折扣就入手。
c*r
4 楼
re
m*n
7 楼
re
l*w
8 楼
I think they will return your check without cash it.
a*a
9 楼
两个kit zoom lens的成像哪个好一些?
l*u
10 楼
热
s*s
11 楼
cong
d*0
12 楼
两个kit lens基本一样大
r*0
15 楼
re
a*a
16 楼
因为有时候开车路过一些地方就想拍些风景所以觉得zoom lens还是蛮重要的。
a*3
19 楼
re
w*a
21 楼
re
a*a
24 楼
关键是成像质量啊。做工我不是很在乎。
还有sony的镜头怎么清一色金属?喜欢黑色传统一点。
还有sony的镜头怎么清一色金属?喜欢黑色传统一点。
a*a
25 楼
关键是成像质量啊。做工我不是很在乎。
还有sony的镜头怎么清一色金属?喜欢黑色传统一点。
还有sony的镜头怎么清一色金属?喜欢黑色传统一点。
a*a
27 楼
菜头的价格什么时候革命?
a*a
31 楼
好那我就等明年富士革命机x100吧。或者gf2(传说有evf内置)。他们幅面是不是大一
点。。。
点。。。
a*a
39 楼
O's zoom - how much is it?
Or i can consider EPL1+Panasonic Pancake+O's zoom????????
銆愬湪dabawang (澶ч湼鐜
鐨勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆:鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> 銆鍦╠abawang (澶ч湼鐜 鐨勫
ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆: 鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> onmouseout="_tipoff()">銆lt;/span> 銆lt;/span> onmouseout="_tipoff()">鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩span> 銆lt;/span> 銆lt;/
span> 杩欎釜鎼厤寰堜笉
閿..gf1閰0鍜宱瀹秡oom杩欎釜鎼厤寰堜笉閿..gf1閰0鍜宱瀹秡oom<
/span>
Or i can consider EPL1+Panasonic Pancake+O's zoom????????
銆愬湪dabawang (澶ч湼鐜
鐨勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆:鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> 銆鍦╠abawang (澶ч湼鐜 鐨勫
ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆: 鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> onmouseout="_tipoff()">銆lt;/span> 銆lt;/span> onmouseout="_tipoff()">鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩span> 銆lt;/span> 銆lt;/
span> 杩欎釜鎼厤寰堜笉
閿..gf1閰0鍜宱瀹秡oom杩欎釜鎼厤寰堜笉閿..gf1閰0鍜宱瀹秡oom<
/span>
e*n
42 楼
P+的1445要好
dpreview的评价"The Lumix 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 OIS does extremely well in our
studio tests....it even out-performs the best of the kit zooms for
conventional DSLRs."
S+的1855就一般了
dpreview评价"The E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 puts in a pretty decent showing as APS-C
kit lenses go, and easily holds its own against those typically bundled
with SLRs. “
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: 两个kit zoom lens的成像哪个好一些?
dpreview的评价"The Lumix 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 OIS does extremely well in our
studio tests....it even out-performs the best of the kit zooms for
conventional DSLRs."
S+的1855就一般了
dpreview评价"The E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 puts in a pretty decent showing as APS-C
kit lenses go, and easily holds its own against those typically bundled
with SLRs. “
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: 两个kit zoom lens的成像哪个好一些?
d*g
43 楼
就是那个m.zuiko 14-42...ebay上面一百块出头。。。epl1估计比gf1配上去更好因为
有防抖。。。我当时是买的gf1+20 kit所以就这么用le
google
) 鐨勫
;
;
鐨勩€
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: O's zoom - how much is it?
: Or i can consider EPL1+Panasonic Pancake+O's zoom????????
: 銆愬湪dabawang (澶ч湼鐜
: 鐨勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆:鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> 銆鍦╠abawang (澶ч湼鐜 鐨勫
: ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆: 鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> : onmouseout="_tipoff()">銆lt;/span> 銆lt;/span> : onmouseout="_tipoff()">鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩
有防抖。。。我当时是买的gf1+20 kit所以就这么用le
) 鐨勫
;
;
鐨勩€
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: O's zoom - how much is it?
: Or i can consider EPL1+Panasonic Pancake+O's zoom????????
: 銆愬湪dabawang (澶ч湼鐜
: 鐨勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆:鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> 銆鍦╠abawang (澶ч湼鐜 鐨勫
: ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆: 鍝堝搱銆lt;/span> : onmouseout="_tipoff()">銆lt;/span> 銆lt;/span> : onmouseout="_tipoff()">鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩鎴戝氨鏄繖涔堢敤鐨勩
b*8
44 楼
我实在不理解Nex5镜头大机身小的逻辑在哪。头重脚轻拿起来很不爽阿。就跟你在500D
上加一个70-200/2.8L一样。
上加一个70-200/2.8L一样。
b*8
53 楼
高感上是比卡片机有优势,但是比DSLR没有啊。而且和卡片机的体积优势一比,两者就
互相抵消了。我觉着next唯一的优势就是能做到背景虚化。这跟机身体积关系不大,主
要是镜头设计和幅面大小。除非你弄个饼干头一直挂着。这样和拿个D3100+35/1.8没有
本质上的体积区别啊?所以我很困惑。
互相抵消了。我觉着next唯一的优势就是能做到背景虚化。这跟机身体积关系不大,主
要是镜头设计和幅面大小。除非你弄个饼干头一直挂着。这样和拿个D3100+35/1.8没有
本质上的体积区别啊?所以我很困惑。
a*i
55 楼
没有直接对比,dp的话也就是看看而已
-C
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: P+的1445要好
: dpreview的评价"The Lumix 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 OIS does extremely well in our
: studio tests....it even out-performs the best of the kit zooms for
: conventional DSLRs."
: S+的1855就一般了
: dpreview评价"The E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 puts in a pretty decent showing as APS-C
: kit lenses go, and easily holds its own against those typically bundled
: with SLRs. “
-C
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: P+的1445要好
: dpreview的评价"The Lumix 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 OIS does extremely well in our
: studio tests....it even out-performs the best of the kit zooms for
: conventional DSLRs."
: S+的1855就一般了
: dpreview评价"The E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 puts in a pretty decent showing as APS-C
: kit lenses go, and easily holds its own against those typically bundled
: with SLRs. “
a*a
61 楼
how about these 2 options:
1. EPL1+kit zoom then wait for GF2+pancake? = $550 now + $600 (i think gf2
will match nex5). then ebay EPL1 for $300 = $850 ??
2. GF1+pancake+ebay M.zuiker = $800 ??
1. EPL1+kit zoom then wait for GF2+pancake? = $550 now + $600 (i think gf2
will match nex5). then ebay EPL1 for $300 = $850 ??
2. GF1+pancake+ebay M.zuiker = $800 ??
e*n
63 楼
那就分别看看了:
解像度:
P+1445
S+1855
紫边:
P+
"Lateral chromatic aberration .. is therefore essentially nonexistent."
S+
"Chromatic aberration is reasonably well-controlled. As is normally the case
there's visible fringing towards the corners at wideangle, which is mainly
red/cyan in color. ..."
变形:
P+
"Distortion is below 1% at all focal lengths, meaning that in practical
terms you'll never see it."
S+
"Distortion is unusually high."
【在 a**i 的大作中提到】
: 没有直接对比,dp的话也就是看看而已
:
: -C
解像度:
P+1445
S+1855
紫边:
P+
"Lateral chromatic aberration .. is therefore essentially nonexistent."
S+
"Chromatic aberration is reasonably well-controlled. As is normally the case
there's visible fringing towards the corners at wideangle, which is mainly
red/cyan in color. ..."
变形:
P+
"Distortion is below 1% at all focal lengths, meaning that in practical
terms you'll never see it."
S+
"Distortion is unusually high."
【在 a**i 的大作中提到】
: 没有直接对比,dp的话也就是看看而已
:
: -C
a*a
66 楼
how about the kit zoom lens from O versus P?
got the suggestion above to get a epl1 zoom kit + p's pancake.
i am selling out my apsc d40 and a few lens now like the 18-200mm.
need a smaller sidekick.
got the suggestion above to get a epl1 zoom kit + p's pancake.
i am selling out my apsc d40 and a few lens now like the 18-200mm.
need a smaller sidekick.
R*a
67 楼
CA跟distortion,P机内做了矫正,连raw都改了。
实际咋做光学对比呢?
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 那就分别看看了:
: 解像度:
: P+1445
: S+1855
: 紫边:
: P+
: "Lateral chromatic aberration .. is therefore essentially nonexistent."
: S+
: "Chromatic aberration is reasonably well-controlled. As is normally the case
: there's visible fringing towards the corners at wideangle, which is mainly
实际咋做光学对比呢?
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 那就分别看看了:
: 解像度:
: P+1445
: S+1855
: 紫边:
: P+
: "Lateral chromatic aberration .. is therefore essentially nonexistent."
: S+
: "Chromatic aberration is reasonably well-controlled. As is normally the case
: there's visible fringing towards the corners at wideangle, which is mainly
a*a
73 楼
although your comment seems offensive - but i agree with you.
all M43 lens should be small like the M.Zuiker...
does not make sense.
銆愬湪daye520 (鍝堝搱)鐨
勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆:浣滀负涓釜钘曠矇锛岄粦鏉句笅鍌诲ぇ榛戠矖娌′粈涔堜
笉瀵圭殑銆lt;/span> 銆鍦╠aye520 (鍝堝搱) 鐨勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆: 浣滀负
涓釜钘曠矇锛岄粦鏉句笅鍌诲ぇ榛戠矖娌′粈涔堜笉瀵圭殑銆lt;/span> onmouseover="_tipon(this)" onmouseout="_tipoff()">灞呯劧鍦╩43涓婇潰鎼為暅澶撮
槻鎶栵紝鍌讳笉鎷夊徑鐨lt;/span>灞呯劧鍦╩43涓婇潰鎼為暅澶撮槻鎶栵紝鍌讳笉鎷夊
徑鐨lt;/span>
all M43 lens should be small like the M.Zuiker...
does not make sense.
銆愬湪daye520 (鍝堝搱)鐨
勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆:浣滀负涓釜钘曠矇锛岄粦鏉句笅鍌诲ぇ榛戠矖娌′粈涔堜
笉瀵圭殑銆lt;/span> 銆鍦╠aye520 (鍝堝搱) 鐨勫ぇ浣滀腑鎻愬埌: 銆: 浣滀负
涓釜钘曠矇锛岄粦鏉句笅鍌诲ぇ榛戠矖娌′粈涔堜笉瀵圭殑銆lt;/span> onmouseover="_tipon(this)" onmouseout="_tipoff()">灞呯劧鍦╩43涓婇潰鎼為暅澶撮
槻鎶栵紝鍌讳笉鎷夊徑鐨lt;/span>灞呯劧鍦╩43涓婇潰鎼為暅澶撮槻鎶栵紝鍌讳笉鎷夊
徑鐨lt;/span>
R*a
75 楼
被问及为啥O没有机内矫正,按照贵掌门奥巴说法,
机内矫正反正可以photoshop自己调,呵呵。
http://www.dslrmagazine.com/digital/tecnicas-de-fotografia-digital/entrevista-con-olympus.html
But we are competitors (Olympus and Panasonic) and fought as such. And so,
we reserve some room for maneuver ("allowances") to distinguish
They are small parts and therefore can not guarantee 100% perfection
Obviously our own brand for preserving a certain degree of freedom (to try
to be better), and we think most users will not be able to appreciate such
details as small
There is always the possibility that the most demanding users create a
filter for Photoshop fixes specific to that and apply it to the extent to
files obtained by" crossing "of equipment"
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 你是造相机的, 卖相机的,还是用相机的?
机内矫正反正可以photoshop自己调,呵呵。
http://www.dslrmagazine.com/digital/tecnicas-de-fotografia-digital/entrevista-con-olympus.html
But we are competitors (Olympus and Panasonic) and fought as such. And so,
we reserve some room for maneuver ("allowances") to distinguish
They are small parts and therefore can not guarantee 100% perfection
Obviously our own brand for preserving a certain degree of freedom (to try
to be better), and we think most users will not be able to appreciate such
details as small
There is always the possibility that the most demanding users create a
filter for Photoshop fixes specific to that and apply it to the extent to
files obtained by" crossing "of equipment"
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 你是造相机的, 卖相机的,还是用相机的?
a*a
77 楼
will the current panasonic pancake be upgraded to a newer version along with
the GF2 release? If not I'll buy the lens now.
the GF2 release? If not I'll buy the lens now.
a*a
83 楼
will the current panasonic pancake be upgraded to a newer version along with
the GF2 release? If not I'll buy the lens now.
【在 R***a 的大作中提到】
: 被问及为啥O没有机内矫正,按照贵掌门奥巴说法,
: 机内矫正反正可以photoshop自己调,呵呵。
: http://www.dslrmagazine.com/digital/tecnicas-de-fotografia-digital/entrevista-con-olympus.html
: But we are competitors (Olympus and Panasonic) and fought as such. And so,
: we reserve some room for maneuver ("allowances") to distinguish
: They are small parts and therefore can not guarantee 100% perfection
: Obviously our own brand for preserving a certain degree of freedom (to try
: to be better), and we think most users will not be able to appreciate such
: details as small
: There is always the possibility that the most demanding users create a
the GF2 release? If not I'll buy the lens now.
【在 R***a 的大作中提到】
: 被问及为啥O没有机内矫正,按照贵掌门奥巴说法,
: 机内矫正反正可以photoshop自己调,呵呵。
: http://www.dslrmagazine.com/digital/tecnicas-de-fotografia-digital/entrevista-con-olympus.html
: But we are competitors (Olympus and Panasonic) and fought as such. And so,
: we reserve some room for maneuver ("allowances") to distinguish
: They are small parts and therefore can not guarantee 100% perfection
: Obviously our own brand for preserving a certain degree of freedom (to try
: to be better), and we think most users will not be able to appreciate such
: details as small
: There is always the possibility that the most demanding users create a
相关阅读
包子请教T3i & 18-135mm镜头 $800+算deal么?Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1.4照相机店家说white box啥意思一步到位, 请推荐Nikkor 35mm/1.8G 定焦比18-200mm变焦好多少?搞到了苏菲玛索的亲笔签名Merry Christmas & Happy New Year !!!tablet现在那个牌子比较热弱问一下如何选择闪灯?C+门下真是痛苦iphone5坑人啊,弯弯的ip5包子求问Adoroma 2880 printer rebate谁能推荐一些后期处理的书跟教程啊?D600对焦好厉害什么是假单反?[WTB] UPC code of Canon T4i with 18-55mm kit28+50+85mm f/1.8G or 24-70mm?6D要不要出手?Free 3-Months of Flickr Pro (转载)版上有玩转接康蔡的筒子没?