36MP 就是能当显微镜用吧# PhotoGear - 摄影器材
l*g
1 楼
本人10月26日递交EB1A, 后过了一个月追加PP, 结果不幸遇到0454,质疑引用未过1000
.承认了发表的文章,承认了review其他人的paper,质疑contribution。原话是:“
upon examining your citation history,we have concluded that, while your
research demonstrates original contributions in the field, the number of
citations of your work, when compared with that of the very top scientists
in the field, whose publications(according to google scholar) have garnered
citations numbered the thousands, dose not establish contributions of major
significance in the field”
本人情况:
文章:21篇,一作7篇,一作有两篇IF>10,是领域排名第一的杂志。
引用:325.
审稿:36篇
推荐人:5个,3个非独立。
关于0454, 我看到版上有人说也被质疑过citation不到1000. 那么,我现在到底该不
该回复,还是回复后还是会悲剧。要求3月中旬交回RFE材料。 我是不是该withdraw后
重新递交,而不要浪费这个时间。如果withdraw重新递交的话需要等多长时间, 重新
递交的话直接PP的话风险大不大,会不会又遇到杀手?希望有经验的筒子能给点建议,
谢谢!
.承认了发表的文章,承认了review其他人的paper,质疑contribution。原话是:“
upon examining your citation history,we have concluded that, while your
research demonstrates original contributions in the field, the number of
citations of your work, when compared with that of the very top scientists
in the field, whose publications(according to google scholar) have garnered
citations numbered the thousands, dose not establish contributions of major
significance in the field”
本人情况:
文章:21篇,一作7篇,一作有两篇IF>10,是领域排名第一的杂志。
引用:325.
审稿:36篇
推荐人:5个,3个非独立。
关于0454, 我看到版上有人说也被质疑过citation不到1000. 那么,我现在到底该不
该回复,还是回复后还是会悲剧。要求3月中旬交回RFE材料。 我是不是该withdraw后
重新递交,而不要浪费这个时间。如果withdraw重新递交的话需要等多长时间, 重新
递交的话直接PP的话风险大不大,会不会又遇到杀手?希望有经验的筒子能给点建议,
谢谢!