h*i
2 楼
1
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
a*9
3 楼
1+
【在 h******i 的大作中提到】
: 1
【在 h******i 的大作中提到】
: 1
G*g
4 楼
1
g*g
5 楼
1
p*r
6 楼
显然是 1
l*s
7 楼
是2的光线不自然是吗？
b*x
8 楼
2
a*m
9 楼
2的几盏灯好像有点distracting。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 是2的光线不自然是吗？
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 是2的光线不自然是吗？
p*e
10 楼
2的人1的背景
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
w*f
11 楼
1。
因为主人公穿正装，摆正规坐姿，在办公场所。
体会一下吧。你们只看到图片，而不看其内容。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
因为主人公穿正装，摆正规坐姿，在办公场所。
体会一下吧。你们只看到图片，而不看其内容。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
l*s
12 楼
personally, i like 2. but i can totally understand why people prefer 1 more.
i will go with 1. thanks for all the input.
i will go with 1. thanks for all the input.
N*e
13 楼
高人指点一下吧，为啥我一眼就喜欢2呢？
1的背景难道没有一点点的过曝？
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
1的背景难道没有一点点的过曝？
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 同一个场景，不同的光。我盯着看了半天了也挑不出来。佛爷们帮帮忙，说说。
l*s
14 楼
I shoot a lot of office environment, where the background is not very clean.
2 is what I usually do, under expose environment for -2 stops or more, and
light the person with flash. This way, the person will pop out right at you
, and the background appears less distractive. Below is a few more photo of
the same approach.
1 is a different approach. When the environment is already brighter than the
person, trying to heavily underexpose the background may not look right.
But taking a shot without flash won't look good b/c the lighting on the face
is not right. I have to be very careful, and use a very tiny bit of flash
power to put in a directional light. It is hard to do sometimes, or I have
not figure out how to do it repeatedly without too much thinking.
When I am time constrained, 2 is my solution until I fully figured out 1.
2 is what I usually do, under expose environment for -2 stops or more, and
light the person with flash. This way, the person will pop out right at you
, and the background appears less distractive. Below is a few more photo of
the same approach.
1 is a different approach. When the environment is already brighter than the
person, trying to heavily underexpose the background may not look right.
But taking a shot without flash won't look good b/c the lighting on the face
is not right. I have to be very careful, and use a very tiny bit of flash
power to put in a directional light. It is hard to do sometimes, or I have
not figure out how to do it repeatedly without too much thinking.
When I am time constrained, 2 is my solution until I fully figured out 1.
相关阅读
哎万佛，看football可以带单反吗？奔个电线杆～猜！5D2现在多少能收到？is this hot? NEX-3+16mm=329.99goldbox看来是work的【试拍图已附上】奔了！－山寨名“副厂人像镜皇”奔我拍的妹子==“奔～～自家小娃万佛，1000+postive FB的泰国买家要买，卖吗？还是A77牛啊，对焦比较好，像素比无敌兔还多，还小巧美国的羊肉怎么也不好吃骗子的智商。。。狂奔/晒最近入的包包和鞋子等(多图）！ (转载)周日不卖酒这种破烂法律什么时候能废除。。。outlook的问题要Klasse W的[for sale] Refurb 5D Mark II body同笑们，你们在lion下怎么写ntfs？看看X100的微距问题