avatar
l*m
1
What typically happens in these situations is that the victim company has to
massively dilute its share structure from the constant paying of the
monthly burn rate with money received from the selling of “real” shares at
artificially low levels. Then the goal of the naked short sellers is to
point out to the investors, usually via paid “Internet bashers”, that with
the, let’s say, 50 billion shares currently issued and outstanding, that
this lousy company is not worth the $5 million market cap it is trading at,
especially if it is just a shell company whose primary business plan was
wiped out by the naked short sellers’ tortuous interference earlier on.
The truth of the matter is that the single biggest asset of these victim
companies often becomes the astronomically large aggregate naked short
position that has accumulated throughout the initial “bear raid” and also
during the “cellar boxing” phase. The goal of the victim company now
becomes to avoid the 3 main goals of the naked short sellers, namely:
bankruptcy, a reverse split, or the forced signing of a death spiral
convertible debenture out of desperation. As long as the victim company can
continue to pay the monthly burn rate, then the game plan becomes to make
some of the strategic moves that hundreds of victim companies have been
forced into doing which includes name changes, CUSIP # changes, cancel/
reissue procedures, dividend distributions, amending of by-laws and Articles
of Corporation, etc. Nevada domiciled companies usually cancel all of their
shares in the system, both real and fake, and force shareholders and their
b/ds to PROVE the ownership of the old “real” shares before they get a new
“real” share. Many also file their civil suits at this time also. This
indirect forcing of hundreds of U.S. micro cap corporations to go through
all of these extraneous hoops and hurdles as a means to survive, whether it
be due to regulatory apathy or lack of resources, is probably one of the
biggest black eyes the U.S. financial systems have ever sustained. In a
perfect world it would be the regulators that periodically audit the “C”
and “D” sub-accounts at the DTCC, the proprietary accounts of the MMs,
clearing firms, and Canadian b/ds, and force the buy-in of counterfeit
shares, many of which are hiding behind altered CUSIP #s, that are detected
above the Rule 11830 guidelines for allowable “failed deliveries” of one
half of 1% of the shares issued. U.S. micro cap corporations should not have
to periodically “purge” their share structure of counterfeit electronic
book entries but if the regulators will not do it then management has a
fiduciary duty to do it.
A lot of management teams become overwhelmed with grief and guilt in regards
to the huge increase in the number of shares issued and outstanding that
have accumulated during their “watch”. The truth however is that as long
as management made the proper corporate governance moves throughout this
ordeal then a huge number of resultant shares issued and outstanding is
unavoidable and often indicative of an astronomically high naked short
position and is nothing to be ashamed of. These massive naked short
positions need to be looked upon as huge assets that need to be developed.
Hopefully the regulators will come to grips with the reality of naked short
selling and tactics like "Cellar boxing" and quickly address this fraud that
has decimated thousands of U.S. micro cap corporations and the tens of
millions of U.S. investors therein.
http://www.hotstockmarket.com/t/68486/facinating-article-on-cel
avatar
b*e
2
想入一个43玩一玩,之前一直用的最老的sony nex3,众佛有啥建议吗?
avatar
D*3
3
上全幅
avatar
b*e
4
镜头都有些重啊

【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: 上全幅
avatar
e*n
5
still photo都差不多. g7的优势在视频和追焦, em5II的优势在防抖. 不过这俩都是
刚上市, 价钱有水分.
如果不是非要4k和dfd的话, gx7是很好的选择.

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 想入一个43玩一玩,之前一直用的最老的sony nex3,众佛有啥建议吗?
avatar
b*e
6
gx7现在什么价?我比较倾向有翻转屏的

【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: still photo都差不多. g7的优势在视频和追焦, em5II的优势在防抖. 不过这俩都是
: 刚上市, 价钱有水分.
: 如果不是非要4k和dfd的话, gx7是很好的选择.

avatar
e*n
7
GX7价格比较坚挺. 目前最好的deal是$800套机-$250gift card. GX8马上要发布了,
GX7可能很快再降价.
g7还是em5 mkii还有一个考虑因素是镜头. 虽然说两家镜头通用, 但是最好是P+镜头配
P+机身. 如果P+镜头配O+机身会有以下问题:
不带开关防抖按键的镜头,在部分奥巴机上无法关闭防抖
20是高ISO会出现不规则横纹(仅限用sony sensor的机身). 20在O+机身对焦速度明显比
在P+的慢
很多镜头的CA不校正
O+镜头用在P+机身也有问题,
主要的是DFD. DFD需要机身里存储镜头bokeh数据, 目前只支持P+镜头.
所以, 最好是看上了哪家的镜头, 就入哪家的机身, 比如你要是看上了20饼了, 那就最
好进P+机身

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: gx7现在什么价?我比较倾向有翻转屏的
avatar
b*e
8
太详细了!非常感谢,双黄包奉上
如果是摄影比较多,是不是机身防抖也很重要?看了下O+防抖好,但是对焦不行。P+对
焦好,防抖不行。据说A6100出来之后要加4k 和IBIS,是不是再等等那个?

【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: GX7价格比较坚挺. 目前最好的deal是$800套机-$250gift card. GX8马上要发布了,
: GX7可能很快再降价.
: g7还是em5 mkii还有一个考虑因素是镜头. 虽然说两家镜头通用, 但是最好是P+镜头配
: P+机身. 如果P+镜头配O+机身会有以下问题:
: 不带开关防抖按键的镜头,在部分奥巴机上无法关闭防抖
: 20是高ISO会出现不规则横纹(仅限用sony sensor的机身). 20在O+机身对焦速度明显比
: 在P+的慢
: 很多镜头的CA不校正
: O+镜头用在P+机身也有问题,
: 主要的是DFD. DFD需要机身里存储镜头bokeh数据, 目前只支持P+镜头.

avatar
e*n
9
5轴防抖是比较好, P+大部分镜头也有防抖. 而且有的review对比的结果是GX7的机身防
抖效果比5轴还好.
http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/10/17/the-g
O+对焦不行是相对的, 单次对焦非常好, em5II的追焦也有很大进步(根据dpr的评测).
我对a6100有4k表示怀疑. S+全线只有A7s能做4K, 还得外接解码器. 而且S+录像散热一
向是大问题, 以前经常过热关机. 4k运算量和发热要大得多. APS-C E口从来没有
IBIS, 出现在a6100上面的可能性非常小.

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 太详细了!非常感谢,双黄包奉上
: 如果是摄影比较多,是不是机身防抖也很重要?看了下O+防抖好,但是对焦不行。P+对
: 焦好,防抖不行。据说A6100出来之后要加4k 和IBIS,是不是再等等那个?

avatar
b*e
10
所以如果喜欢 便携 和 摄像,m43的比aps-c的微单要好用很多?em5 ii的坏处就是价
格水分比较大了
这个买数码产品是不是买新不买旧啊,感觉花500刀买一个两年前出产的相机感觉有点
亏呢, gx7。gx8对gx7提升大吗?

.

【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 5轴防抖是比较好, P+大部分镜头也有防抖. 而且有的review对比的结果是GX7的机身防
: 抖效果比5轴还好.
: http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/10/17/the-g
: O+对焦不行是相对的, 单次对焦非常好, em5II的追焦也有很大进步(根据dpr的评测).
: 我对a6100有4k表示怀疑. S+全线只有A7s能做4K, 还得外接解码器. 而且S+录像散热一
: 向是大问题, 以前经常过热关机. 4k运算量和发热要大得多. APS-C E口从来没有
: IBIS, 出现在a6100上面的可能性非常小.

avatar
e*n
11
机身+镜头的体积, m43是比aps-c的微单要小, 而且镜头选择多得多. 摄像也是P+传统
长项.
EM5当年的掉价是比较慢的, 一年才掉了20%左右, 估计EM5II也差不多. 一般来说, 各
家旗舰掉价都比较慢. GX7也还不错, 都快2年了, GX8都快发布了, 也就跌了45%.
GX8比GX7至少是要多4K录像和DFD对焦, sensor是不是新的还未知. 我觉得光4K录像和
DFD对焦这两项就是很大的提升了. 不急得话等2周, 看看GX8发布的具体spec.

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 所以如果喜欢 便携 和 摄像,m43的比aps-c的微单要好用很多?em5 ii的坏处就是价
: 格水分比较大了
: 这个买数码产品是不是买新不买旧啊,感觉花500刀买一个两年前出产的相机感觉有点
: 亏呢, gx7。gx8对gx7提升大吗?
:
: .

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。