Redian新闻
>
Dpreview: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition
avatar
Dpreview: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition# PhotoGear - 摄影器材
y*b
1
"Dpreview compared the new Sony RX10III against the Panasonic FZ100 and the
Canon G3X. The Panasonic is as good as the Sony but does only go as far as
400mm. So the real contender seems to be the Canon:
The real reason people consider bridge cameras is for the reach, and Sony
extended the RX10 III’s reach by a full 400mm over the RX10 II. That means
it now offers the same amount of reach as the G3 X’s 600mm equivalent
maximum focal length. The RX10 III’s lens is clearly sharper, but it has
another thing going for it: its faster maximum aperture helps it combat
diffraction. Remember that F4 and F5.6 on 1″-type cameras are equivalent to
F11 and F15, respectively. Both cameras are limited by atmospheric
distortion at these focal lengths (hence the drop to ‘print’ resolution in
the previous comparison link), but it’s clear that the RX10 III exceeds
the G3 X’s performance, while offering just as much zoom versatility. The
Canon PowerShot G3 X’s trump card has been trumped."
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/dpreview-sony-rx10-iii-destroys-
avatar
h*2
2
有dp不猛夸的机器吗?

the
means
to

【在 y*b 的大作中提到】
: "Dpreview compared the new Sony RX10III against the Panasonic FZ100 and the
: Canon G3X. The Panasonic is as good as the Sony but does only go as far as
: 400mm. So the real contender seems to be the Canon:
: The real reason people consider bridge cameras is for the reach, and Sony
: extended the RX10 III’s reach by a full 400mm over the RX10 II. That means
: it now offers the same amount of reach as the G3 X’s 600mm equivalent
: maximum focal length. The RX10 III’s lens is clearly sharper, but it has
: another thing going for it: its faster maximum aperture helps it combat
: diffraction. Remember that F4 and F5.6 on 1″-type cameras are equivalent to
: F11 and F15, respectively. Both cameras are limited by atmospheric

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。