D*3
4 楼
A7II
e*n
8 楼
富士在全心全意做APSC, 而S+基本放弃APSC了. 镜头4,5年没更新. 明显是挤得人去FF.
连个好的标变都没有. 16-50那个狗头怎么能和16-55 f2.8-4比
S+ 16-50mm
http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/842-sony1650f3556oss
Optical Quality:
"The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but
unfortunately not in the positive sense....The inclusion of a 16mm looks
highly attractive on paper but the truth is that the quality is insufficient
here - at least on Sony's 24 megapixel sensor. The resolution improves the
more you zoom out and the lens is actually pretty good in the medium to
upper range. Thus we feel that Sony was somewhat too aggressive here. "
S+16-70mm
http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/901-sony1670f4oss
Optical Quality:
"Unfortunately I only verified the center performance of the lens at the
time which is obviously great. Upon checking the results my disappointment
was high though. Sony/Zeiss did many things right - range, build quality,
image stabilization but optical quality is not part of the list. Yes, the
center quality is outstanding but the corners are often mediocre or even
dismal. ... However, the high mechanical qualities doesn't overshadow the
fact that this Zeiss lens is both heavily overpriced and below average by
today's standards. As such we can only conclude ... not recommended."
【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: 买富士就不会惦记着全幅?
连个好的标变都没有. 16-50那个狗头怎么能和16-55 f2.8-4比
S+ 16-50mm
http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/842-sony1650f3556oss
Optical Quality:
"The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but
unfortunately not in the positive sense....The inclusion of a 16mm looks
highly attractive on paper but the truth is that the quality is insufficient
here - at least on Sony's 24 megapixel sensor. The resolution improves the
more you zoom out and the lens is actually pretty good in the medium to
upper range. Thus we feel that Sony was somewhat too aggressive here. "
S+16-70mm
http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/901-sony1670f4oss
Optical Quality:
"Unfortunately I only verified the center performance of the lens at the
time which is obviously great. Upon checking the results my disappointment
was high though. Sony/Zeiss did many things right - range, build quality,
image stabilization but optical quality is not part of the list. Yes, the
center quality is outstanding but the corners are often mediocre or even
dismal. ... However, the high mechanical qualities doesn't overshadow the
fact that this Zeiss lens is both heavily overpriced and below average by
today's standards. As such we can only conclude ... not recommended."
【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: 买富士就不会惦记着全幅?
D*3
12 楼
现在在说全幅 没m43的事
全幅够我玩十年 十年后再看中画幅.........
FF.
insufficient
the
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 富士在全心全意做APSC, 而S+基本放弃APSC了. 镜头4,5年没更新. 明显是挤得人去FF.
: 连个好的标变都没有. 16-50那个狗头怎么能和16-55 f2.8-4比
: S+ 16-50mm
: http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/842-sony1650f3556oss
: Optical Quality:
: "The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but
: unfortunately not in the positive sense....The inclusion of a 16mm looks
: highly attractive on paper but the truth is that the quality is insufficient
: here - at least on Sony's 24 megapixel sensor. The resolution improves the
: more you zoom out and the lens is actually pretty good in the medium to
全幅够我玩十年 十年后再看中画幅.........
FF.
insufficient
the
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: 富士在全心全意做APSC, 而S+基本放弃APSC了. 镜头4,5年没更新. 明显是挤得人去FF.
: 连个好的标变都没有. 16-50那个狗头怎么能和16-55 f2.8-4比
: S+ 16-50mm
: http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/842-sony1650f3556oss
: Optical Quality:
: "The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but
: unfortunately not in the positive sense....The inclusion of a 16mm looks
: highly attractive on paper but the truth is that the quality is insufficient
: here - at least on Sony's 24 megapixel sensor. The resolution improves the
: more you zoom out and the lens is actually pretty good in the medium to
相关阅读