几个月前求婚被拒痛不欲生的人# Piebridge - 鹊桥
e*m
1 楼
前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
You have provided: citation records.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
beneficiary's work are not about the beneficiary, but rather are about the
individual author's own work.
2. Evidence of beneficiary's participation, either individually or on a
panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied academic
field.
The criterion has been met.
3. Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
You has provided: letters from peers and colleagues, patent applications and
evidence of conference participation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
4. Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
in the academic field.
You have provided: publication and citation records.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence is incomplete. Please
submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles in the academic
field that the beneficiary has authored. You may submit:
Updated results from scholay literature search website that show the
beneficiary's citation record excluding cites by the beneficiary, the
beneficiary's coauthors and the beneficiary's research group members.
大致内容如上，我的感觉是：1. 律师错把引用文章的情况发到MEDIA REPORT上面去了
？这个根本就不应该CLAIM？
2. 对REVIEW无异议。
3. 质疑CONTRIBUTIONS？这个我应该怎么处理？
4. 质疑AUTHORSHIP。感觉0002是建议提供引用文章的LIST，并且区分自引和他引。
还请大家多多帮助，谢谢！
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
You have provided: citation records.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
beneficiary's work are not about the beneficiary, but rather are about the
individual author's own work.
2. Evidence of beneficiary's participation, either individually or on a
panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied academic
field.
The criterion has been met.
3. Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
You has provided: letters from peers and colleagues, patent applications and
evidence of conference participation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
4. Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
in the academic field.
You have provided: publication and citation records.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence is incomplete. Please
submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles in the academic
field that the beneficiary has authored. You may submit:
Updated results from scholay literature search website that show the
beneficiary's citation record excluding cites by the beneficiary, the
beneficiary's coauthors and the beneficiary's research group members.
大致内容如上，我的感觉是：1. 律师错把引用文章的情况发到MEDIA REPORT上面去了
？这个根本就不应该CLAIM？
2. 对REVIEW无异议。
3. 质疑CONTRIBUTIONS？这个我应该怎么处理？
4. 质疑AUTHORSHIP。感觉0002是建议提供引用文章的LIST，并且区分自引和他引。
还请大家多多帮助，谢谢！
