现在的雀版是---# Piebridge - 鹊桥
m*2
1 楼
I-140 NSC PP 11 天后收到RFE，需要额外的information:
1.Petitioner’s documented accomplishments in the academic field
这个好解决
2.Ability to pay
这个也应该没问题
3.我claim了老三样，
Publication, this criterion has been met
Original contribution, this criterion has been met
Judge of others work, this criterion has been met
但是它最后来了这样一段：
Merely meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined above will not
establish eligibility for the E12 immigrant classification. Any evidence
submitted in response to this request, should also articulate how the
evidence establishes that the beneficiary possesses the required high level
of expertise for the E12 immigrant classification.
请问这是什么意思? 写的太general了，是指整体的evidence还不足够支持？需要补充
更多的evidence么？多加2份推荐信可行么？还是需要继续挖掘材料里的闪光点么？
有经验的同学帮忙分析一下，多谢啦.
1.Petitioner’s documented accomplishments in the academic field
这个好解决
2.Ability to pay
这个也应该没问题
3.我claim了老三样，
Publication, this criterion has been met
Original contribution, this criterion has been met
Judge of others work, this criterion has been met
但是它最后来了这样一段：
Merely meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined above will not
establish eligibility for the E12 immigrant classification. Any evidence
submitted in response to this request, should also articulate how the
evidence establishes that the beneficiary possesses the required high level
of expertise for the E12 immigrant classification.
请问这是什么意思? 写的太general了，是指整体的evidence还不足够支持？需要补充
更多的evidence么？多加2份推荐信可行么？还是需要继续挖掘材料里的闪光点么？
有经验的同学帮忙分析一下，多谢啦.
