Redian新闻
>
80-20规律:给琐男科普下自由婚恋市场的那些事 (转载)
avatar
80-20规律:给琐男科普下自由婚恋市场的那些事 (转载)# Piebridge - 鹊桥
x*a
1
ebay的交易,如果paypal里说fund available了,而且我已经转到我自己的银行里了。
过了一段时间,买家理由不充分的说要refund,我可不可以拒绝refund?如果可以的话
,那我的paypal里是不是就出现负值,我还是要把钱给paypal补回去?
avatar
c*n
2
今天本来欢欢喜喜去cvs打算拿免费倒赚的漱口水和牙膏(好吧家里已经屯了好些年的
量),coupon.com打印的creast的1off的胖胖两张,居然有一张beep,小二也不手动,
说不识别就不用.......其实没啥的,我也不亏,但是觉得不爽..
回来我琢磨下是不是cvs现在系统默认不让倒赚的啊!如果是这样可是大事...
crest 漱口岁4.99刀一瓶,colgate牙膏2.99一只,各拿一支
4.99*2+2.99*2=15.96-3off(crt 3off15)-1off mfc=11.96出12ecb 平帐
如果那张不beep的话,我就是10.96出12ecb了啊
其实我这单还买了很多其他的东西oop除掉话掉20ecb还自己付了15刀啊
难道cvs系统这么聪明了?怪怪的
不知道是不是这样的,求解答
ps:忘记了,cvs门口摆了一筐cvs的p&g的胖子本
tx注意下,记得拿
avatar
m*8
3
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: umutata (土著人), 信区: Military
标 题: 80-20规律:给琐男科普下自由婚恋市场的那些事
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 12 15:58:42 2015, 美东)
文章比较长,我给个尽量简短易懂的摘要。我只陈述客观现象,不作道德评判。
如果有1000个男的,1000的女的,放到一个孤岛上。理论上,他们很快会结成1000对伴
侣,但实际上比这复杂多了。
这1000个女的当中,有800个会去围着男的当中200个条件最好的转。这200个男的平均
每人有四个女的,于是就变得花心,在多个女的中间周旋,保持好几个炮友。而其他
800个男的就很难操上逼,心理容易出问题,有的会攻击那些Top 20%的男的,成为杀人
犯;有的会攻击那些80%的女的,成为强奸犯。
而女的当中,那80%的女的会逐渐厌倦跟众多其他女人的竞争,离开top 20%的男的,去
找80%的男的接盘。甚至还有女的跟top 20%男的生了孩子之后找人接盘,接盘男还要养
别人的孩子。
最后加上我的评论:
第一,所谓的“自由”婚恋市场,实际上得到自由的只是少部分男人,多数男人是被剥
夺了自由。“自由”得越彻底,多数人的自由就被剥夺得更厉害。没有了道德约束的绝
对性自由的后果,就是人类社会退化成猴群:一个雄性猴王占有所有雌性,其他公猴断
子绝孙。
第二,所谓“高富帅,屌丝,接盘”这些事,是现代“自由”婚恋的必然结果,在任何
族群任何文化下都一样。有些人似乎以为这些事是华人社区独有的,甚至听到别人讨论
就给人扣上“猥琐男买买提上多了”的帽子,是不对的。他们即使拿胶布封上“猥琐男
”的嘴,也改变不了他们当中女的被“高富帅”操完甩掉,男的撸管接烂盘的社会现实。
第三,那些说什么白男心胸宽广不在乎接盘的外F女可以歇了。社会大规律在那摆着,
所有男人的心理其实都一样,顶多不同文化背景下表现方式有所不同而已,扯不到心胸
宽不宽广的高度。
第四,如果你是撸管琐男,厌恶接盘,仇恨所谓的“高富帅”,那恭喜你,说明你还是
个正常人,正常男人。反倒如果你不这样才有问题,说明你雄性激素分泌不足,不是男
人。
The '80-20 Rule' theory explains a lot of today's problems among dating
singles
Have you ever visited a popular nightclub in a major city, and you noticed
that one guy may have three, four, or five women hanging around him while
another three or four guys in that same club have no women paying them any
attention at all? How could this happen?
Let's say a professional matchmaking organization got one thousand single
heterosexual women together and transported them to an island where all of
their living expenses would be covered, and they would never be in desperate
need for anything crucial to their survival, such as food, beverages,
clothing, and comfortable living quarters. All of these women have
acknowledged that they want to find a long-term boyfriend to spend time with
romantically and sexually.
Now, this same professional matchmaking organization has identified one
thousand healthy single heterosexual men and transported them to this same
island. All of these men have expressed an interest in finding an ideal
woman to spend time with romantically and sexually.
Conventional wisdom says . . . . within a matter of days, weeks, or months,
the men and women on that island will transition from 2,000 individual men
and women into 1,000 happy, loving couples.
The mythical '80-20 Rule' Theory of Dating and Relationships says . . . .
within a matter of days, weeks, or months, approximately 800 of the 1,000
women are going to be competing with each other for the attention and
companionship of roughly 200 of the 1,000 men on that island.
Many would argue that the 'conventional wisdom' scenario would be more
probable and valid while a good number of other men and women would lean
toward acknowledging the validity of the controversial 80-20 Rule Theory.
For those who favor the 'conventional wisdom' scenario, let me ask you just
a few questions:
Why do men who seem to have a great wife or girlfriend cheat on her?
Why do women who seem to have a great husband or boyfriend cheat on him?
Why do so many men become harsh critics of other men who they perceive
as more popular with women than themselves?
Why is it that some men can have sex with multiple women without
spending money on them or promising them indefinite monogamy, while other
men have a hard time getting women to spend time with them in a romantic or
sexual manner even when they are flattering, financially generous, and
totally willing to engage in a monogamous relationship with a woman?
Why do some men start out seeming like "polite nice guys," but months
later or years later, many of these same men become hateful misogynists?
What effects would the '80-20 Rule' Theory cause that would result in us
observing many of the problems we see in today’s dating scene among healthy
, active singles?
Effect #1:
The 'Top 20%' of the men on that island would feel very happy, relaxed, and
content. Why? Because these men would consistently have an average of four
different women offering them an invitation to have sex on a regular basis.
Problem #1 caused by Effect #1:
At least a small percentage of the women … particularly those with selfish,
spoiled egos … are not going to just freely allow those men from the Top
20% to indefinitely have their "pick of the litter." Many of those eight-
hundred women are going to express an ultimatum to the Top 200 men and force
them to choose THEM as their “main woman” (i.e., wife, monogamous sex
partner, long-term girlfriend, etc.).
Problem #2 caused by Effect #1:
As a result of Problem #1, many of the men in the Top 20% are going to
become liars and cheaters. They will indefinitely present themselves as "
monogamy-minded gentlemen," but in reality, they just have too many
opportunities to have sex with other women being thrown their way.
Consequently, they end up choosing one “main woman” and then they relegate
the remaining three women as “mistresses,” “jump offs,” or “on-the-
side women.”
How Effect #1 reveals itself in real life: We all either know, or have heard
about, at least one man who is married, engaged, or involved in what is
supposed to be a long-term monogamous romantic relationship with a woman who
has at least one mistress and at least two other “side pieces.” So, you
could never argue that Effect #1 of the '80-20 Rule' Theory is strictly "
hypothetical."
Effect #2:
Many of the men in the remaining 'Bottom 80%' are going to become agitated
and frustrated as time passes by. This will cause them to either a) become
more competitive and ambitious so that they too can be perceived as being in
that ‘Top 20%’ category, or b) become jealous, envious ‘haters’ of the
men who are currently in the Top 20%, and they will think of some mean-
spirited methods of undermining their romantic and sexual appeal to women.
Problem #1 caused by Effect #2:
Many of the men in the Top 20% category are going to generally get along
with each other. Many of the men in the Bottom 80% are also going to get
along fairly well with one another. But a man who perceives himself in the
Bottom 80% is always going to be ultra-competitive with a man who he
perceives as being in that Top 20%. This will create many “phony
friendships” and incidents of back-stabbing between so-called “friends.”
Problem #2 caused by Effect #2:
Some men will go beyond the idea of simply making attempts to improve their
looks, their level of education, their level of career success, or their
level of wealth. Some men on that island from the Bottom 80% will soon
become so bitter and resentful to the point where they will look to cause
physical harm to the men in the Top 20%. If not physical harm, they will
look for ways to emasculate and humiliate their manhood in some sort of
public manner.
How Effect #2 reveals itself in real life: How many times have you observed
a man who was not that popular with women ‘hating’ on a guy who was real
popular with women? This does not happen by chance or by accident. I have
witnessed men start fights with other men for no valid reason other than the
fact that they were jealous and envious of that man's popularity with women
. This is why many male celebrities (who are popular with women) tend to
only go out in public with some sort of security personnel.
Napoleon Hill, author of Think and Grow Rich, intimated in his book that the
single most significant factor that will motivate a (heterosexual) man to
improve himself and his quality of life is the desire to improve the quality
of women and/or increase the quantity of women he is able to date and have
sex with.
Effect #3:
A number of the women on the island who have grown tired of being relegated
to the status of 'mistress' or 'side piece' by one or more members of the
Top 20% are going to end up doing one of two things: 1) stop pursuing a
monogamous relationship with the men in ‘The Top 20%’ and start “settling
” for the men in the Bottom 80% primarily so they can have children and
someone to provide for them, or 2) stop dating any of the men on the island,
and become content with being by themselves indefinitely (or turn to other
women for romantic and sexual companionship, hence becoming bisexual).
Problem #1 caused by Effect #3:
If scenario #1 happens, many of the women who were formerly the mistresses
and jump offs to the men in the Top 20% are going to become the new
girlfriends and future wives to the men in the bottom 80%. This is where a
saying of mine comes into play: “One man’s kinky fu** buddy is another man
’s wife or girlfriend” (many of my coaching clients and radio show
listeners have quoted me on that dozens of times).
Many of these women will find themselves in a “marriage of convenience”
that really does not truly make them happy. These women will immediately
seek to take control of the relationship, and will expect their male
companion to play up to them and feel “overjoyed” that they were even
selected to have the opportunity to have occasional sex with them that the
men have to practically beg for. Many women will have one or more children
by a man in the Top 20%, and select a man from the Bottom 80% to help her
raise the child(ren).
Problem #2 caused by Effect #3:
If scenario #2 happens, a lot of the men on that island are going to become
incredibly sexually frustrated. Some of those sexually frustrated men will
turn to internet porn, while others will turn to violence provoked by their
long-standing sexual frustration. An extreme few might become so frustrated
and angry that they will start raping or serial killing the women who
blatantly ignored them or harshly rejected them.
How Effect #3 reveals itself in real life: How many men have you met who
literally hate women with a passion? (what is commonly known as a misogynist
). Do you think those men are in the Top 20%? Of course not. If a man’s
only dependable sex partner is his right or left hand coated with Vaseline,
at some point he is going to snap. This is why you have men in society who
have a history of raping women or killing women.
How many times have you known a woman who previously only dated handsome,
popular, charming womanizer types when she was between the ages of 18 and 29
or 21 and 34, but then when she turned 35 or 36, she announced emphatically
that she now wanted an "attentive, considerate, respectful nice guy?"
Riiiiiiiiiiiiight. What she is really saying is, "I dated my share of guys
from the Top 20%, but now that I am getting older and I want to settle down
and have some babies, I am going to 'settle' for a man from that Bottom 80%."
And how many of those types of women do you know who treat their boyfriends
and husbands like total crap? How many men do you know who are currently
married to a woman and raising one or more children that are not even their
own? I rest my case.
Effect #4:
Some of the men on that island from that privileged 'Top 20%' group are
going to find a way to be entrepreneurial, and at the same time, help their
fellow men from the Bottom 80% out. How? They will allow the women who are
currently their mistresses and side pieces to have one night stands with men
from the low end of the totem pole for a flat monetary fee. Welcome to the
wonderful world of Pimpology 101.
Problem #1 caused by Effect #4:
Many of the women who would gladly have sex with a man in the Top 20% are
now exchanging their sexual companionship for financial favors and material
gifts from the men in the Bottom 80%. The men enjoy the sex, but after a
while, they come to resent the fact that they have to pay money for it. They
gain a measure of ‘egotistical revenge’ by labeling such women as “
whores.” Similarly, the men from the Bottom 80% who find out that their
wives and girlfriends are having sex behind-their-back with men from the Top
20% are labeled “sluts.” Many of the women accept these labels with
indifference while other women become sensitive to such labels and label
their critics "misogynists" and "jerks."
Problem #2 caused by Effect #4:
Remember those men from the Bottom 80% who I mentioned had to practically
beg their wives and girlfriends for sex? Some of these men will start having
regular, semi-regular, or occasional interactions with the “women of the
night” (i.e., the women who are being pimped out by the men from the Top 20
%). If they are caught by their wives and girlfriends, this is going to
cause major problems and arguments with their significant others, and those
women who were treated as "leftovers" by the Top 20% are going to break up
or divorce their cheating partners from the Bottom 80%.
How Effect #4 reveals itself in real life: Street pimps were very popular in
the mid-to-late 1960s, the 1970s, and 1980s. There are still a few pimps
who are active in today’s society, but many women - because of feminism and
a new sense of empowerment - tend to act more as “free agents” and
present themselves as upscale Call Girls or Erotic Escorts, and they have
virtually eliminated the need for a pimp's guidance and protection. These
women realize that the vast majority of the men in the Bottom 80% are not
violent, and that these men will pay top dollar to have sex with a woman who
presents herself as being “out of the man's league.”
Bottom line?
There may not be any ‘scientific evidence’ that the '80-20 Rule' Theory of
Dating and Relationships is in full effect in today’s dating scene, but it
is very hard to ignore the seemingly evident ‘proof’ that is in front of
our eyes on a weekly basis. Many single men in today's dating scene are
frustrated, and many of the women are as well.
Quick Q & A
"Alan, applying your 80-20 island scenario to real life, how can I tell if I
am a man in that mythical Top 20%? Is the criteria based on looks? Wealth?
Career success? Sexual prowess? Other?"
Assuming the 80-20 Rule Theory is valid, the simple way you can identify
which category you are in would be if you can pick up your phone right now,
and call up at least four different women who you are genuinely attracted to
- invite them to your place for the specific purpose of having sex with you
- and all four women would enthusiastically reciprocate your invitation
without hesitation or resistance. If that is your reality rather than your
fantasy, you can consider yourself in that highly esteemed Top 20%.
If you are married, but you have at least three other women offering to be
your mistress or side piece, you would also qualify for the Top 20%. Any
other scenario, you would fall into the Bottom 80%.
There are men who have achieved a high degree of career success and wealth
who know nothing about how to attract the romantic and sexual interest of
women. Some men naturally have 'game' and personal charm with women, some
men learn how to have it, and some men will never have it. For the latter,
sad ... but true.
"Alan, will my love life or sex life be miserable if I am perceived as being
in the Bottom 80%?"
Not necessarily. There are a number of men in society who have one
girlfriend who they are happy with or a wife who they are madly in love with
, and those feelings are reciprocated. No man has to be a prolific womanizer
or popular ladies' man in order to be happy.
"Alan, I would think most women would be turned off by men who seem
promiscuous and have a number of other women at their beck and call. This 80
-20 Rule Theory seems to suggest just the opposite. I don't get it. Can you
explain?"
One thing I can assure you: a 'promiscuous past' does not have the same
effect on women that it does with many men who suffer from the negative
effects of The Madonna / Whore Complex. Women are attracted to men who they
feel other women find romantically and sexually desirable (men are not that
much different in that respect). My own late mother even said to me once, "
No woman wants a man who they feel no other woman would want to date."
One service that has become increasingly popular over the past few years is
that of "The Wing Woman." Unlike a Call Girl or an Erotic Escort, who a man
would hire for sexual companionship, the Wing Woman would accompany a man to
a party, nightclub, or other social venue just to help that man capture the
attention and companionship of other women of interest.
Based on my own personal experiences, I will confirm: women do pay more
attention to you when you are seen with one or more attractive women in
public. I had a female friend call into my talk radio show a few months back
and confess that she is one of those women. She said that whenever she was
at a nightclub, she always paid the most attention to the guys who were
there with one or more female companions as opposed to the guys who were in
the nightclub by themselves or with other men.
In the same way many believe that "when you already have wealth, you will
always attract new opportunities for even more wealth," the same can be said
for receiving sexual attention from women. The more attention a man is
already receiving from women, typically, the more opportunities will come
his way way for even more attention from women.
For the men who are already in the mythical 'Top 20%' ... you should be
congratulated. Not hated on. Kudos.
For the men who are in the Bottom 80%, but aspiring to be in the Top 20% ...
you have to have something that drives your ambitions .... right?
For the men who are in the Bottom 80%, and content with being there .... if
you have at least one girlfriend who genuinely loves you to death or a wife
who would never think of cheating on you ... what else do you need?
For the men who are in the Bottom 80% and experiencing profound feelings of
anger, resentment, and frustration ... I am here to help. Contact me (
seriously).
My mission continues . . .
avatar
g*d
4
yes
will be minus

【在 x**********a 的大作中提到】
: ebay的交易,如果paypal里说fund available了,而且我已经转到我自己的银行里了。
: 过了一段时间,买家理由不充分的说要refund,我可不可以拒绝refund?如果可以的话
: ,那我的paypal里是不是就出现负值,我还是要把钱给paypal补回去?

avatar
p*e
5
我周六EA的时候买了,跟你的单类似,不过只买了一支牙膏,因为我的是2off10的CRT,
没任何问题
avatar
s*r
6
男人也一样,眼里就看到美女,有几个男人看见胖丫头,丑丫头想着去了解别人心灵美
的? 所以半斤八两,谁也别寒碜谁
avatar
x*a
7
那我拒绝退他钱,paypal不会自己到我银行去主动提款吧?而且关于这个是否应该退给
他款,到哪儿打官司啊?谁说了算呢?

【在 g********d 的大作中提到】
: yes
: will be minus

avatar
c*n
8
其实nice的小二应该就会手动了
主要碰到机器不识别就不用的小二,
如果系统真变成不能倒赚以后就只能自求遇到好小二了.....
之前去别的cvs有个大叔也是简单粗暴型在系统踢掉的胖子中取可以用的,反正每次在他
哪里每次都有被踢掉的,关键踢掉之后反正不知道怎么价格没有什么争议,因为我都没
有oop很少的,所以差不多就不争什么了

CRT,

【在 p**********e 的大作中提到】
: 我周六EA的时候买了,跟你的单类似,不过只买了一支牙膏,因为我的是2off10的CRT,
: 没任何问题

avatar
m*8
9
完全不同,男人从进化角度,需要追求多个女人。而女人必须守住一个男人
完全不是一回事

【在 s*********r 的大作中提到】
: 男人也一样,眼里就看到美女,有几个男人看见胖丫头,丑丫头想着去了解别人心灵美
: 的? 所以半斤八两,谁也别寒碜谁

avatar
d*r
10
除非你账号不再用了,不然Paypal怎么都会想办法搞你的
avatar
c*r
11
No problem with my purchase. I got 2 mouthwash 2 Colgate, 1 candy,1chip, use
2$1 mfr, 1 $2mfr, $3 off 15, $10ecb, pay $0.99, got $12.75ecb back.
avatar
H*C
12
虽是坑 但true

【在 m********8 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: umutata (土著人), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 80-20规律:给琐男科普下自由婚恋市场的那些事
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 12 15:58:42 2015, 美东)
: 文章比较长,我给个尽量简短易懂的摘要。我只陈述客观现象,不作道德评判。
: 如果有1000个男的,1000的女的,放到一个孤岛上。理论上,他们很快会结成1000对伴
: 侣,但实际上比这复杂多了。
: 这1000个女的当中,有800个会去围着男的当中200个条件最好的转。这200个男的平均
: 每人有四个女的,于是就变得花心,在多个女的中间周旋,保持好几个炮友。而其他
: 800个男的就很难操上逼,心理容易出问题,有的会攻击那些Top 20%的男的,成为杀人

avatar
x*a
13
是啊,如果是负值,只要我一有钱进来,就被负值顶了。这个我明白,大不了不用了。
可我迷惑的是,有几笔,在ebay中也没接到买家的投诉,或要求cancel啥的,但在
paypal里显示cancel,要求refund. 他货都收到了,还cancel啥呢?

【在 d*r 的大作中提到】
: 除非你账号不再用了,不然Paypal怎么都会想办法搞你的
avatar
f*y
14
我用了没beep呢
avatar
c*n
15
5555555555,那就是rp不好了
好吧,以上每个id各领双簧包,攒rp

【在 f*******y 的大作中提到】
: 我用了没beep呢
avatar
p*a
16
请问在California, ECB都是不能抵税的吗?
买了一个漱口水($4.99), 用了$1 Coupon 和$4 ECB. 为什么还要付$0.45 的税?
avatar
o*6
17
我也在CA,我这边ECB是不能抵税的。

【在 p******a 的大作中提到】
: 请问在California, ECB都是不能抵税的吗?
: 买了一个漱口水($4.99), 用了$1 Coupon 和$4 ECB. 为什么还要付$0.45 的税?

avatar
y*8
18
我也刚去买,没有问题。估计是小二问题。

【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: 今天本来欢欢喜喜去cvs打算拿免费倒赚的漱口水和牙膏(好吧家里已经屯了好些年的
: 量),coupon.com打印的creast的1off的胖胖两张,居然有一张beep,小二也不手动,
: 说不识别就不用.......其实没啥的,我也不亏,但是觉得不爽..
: 回来我琢磨下是不是cvs现在系统默认不让倒赚的啊!如果是这样可是大事...
: crest 漱口岁4.99刀一瓶,colgate牙膏2.99一只,各拿一支
: 4.99*2+2.99*2=15.96-3off(crt 3off15)-1off mfc=11.96出12ecb 平帐
: 如果那张不beep的话,我就是10.96出12ecb了啊
: 其实我这单还买了很多其他的东西oop除掉话掉20ecb还自己付了15刀啊
: 难道cvs系统这么聪明了?怪怪的
: 不知道是不是这样的,求解答

avatar
m*u
19
难道cvs每家店系统升级还有差别?
avatar
A*y
20
我居然上周把牙膏屯了...555
avatar
c*n
21
bso上周有别的胖胖

【在 A****y 的大作中提到】
: 我居然上周把牙膏屯了...555
avatar
e*6
22
烦了CVS的小二,现已转战target,虽然很少免费或倒转,至少小二态度普遍温和友善
,愉快购物也很重要
avatar
j*t
23
re

【在 e*****6 的大作中提到】
: 烦了CVS的小二,现已转战target,虽然很少免费或倒转,至少小二态度普遍温和友善
: ,愉快购物也很重要

avatar
d*l
24
我们这儿正好相反……
cvs小二态度老好了……
target小二反而一个胖子研究半天……
羡慕有好的target小二……

【在 e*****6 的大作中提到】
: 烦了CVS的小二,现已转战target,虽然很少免费或倒转,至少小二态度普遍温和友善
: ,愉快购物也很重要

avatar
r*0
25

use
抱歉可以解释下具体什么意思嘛,看不懂,我都是直接买了走人,有时候几十块钱也就
给个几块钱的coupon。2$1 mfr, 1 $2mfr, $3 off 15, $10ecb, pay $0.99, got $12.
75ecb back.
看不懂 mfr,也看不懂ecb什么意思呀

【在 c********r 的大作中提到】
: No problem with my purchase. I got 2 mouthwash 2 Colgate, 1 candy,1chip, use
: 2$1 mfr, 1 $2mfr, $3 off 15, $10ecb, pay $0.99, got $12.75ecb back.

avatar
c*g
26
擦,有钱银bso耶。

12.

【在 r*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: use
: 抱歉可以解释下具体什么意思嘛,看不懂,我都是直接买了走人,有时候几十块钱也就
: 给个几块钱的coupon。2$1 mfr, 1 $2mfr, $3 off 15, $10ecb, pay $0.99, got $12.
: 75ecb back.
: 看不懂 mfr,也看不懂ecb什么意思呀

avatar
k*i
27
lzmm打印的胖没打好吧? 我一般都多打2张带着,以备一旦有beep的可以
补上一张~
avatar
d*l
28
问问题之前请先研究置顶文章
谢谢

12.

【在 r*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: use
: 抱歉可以解释下具体什么意思嘛,看不懂,我都是直接买了走人,有时候几十块钱也就
: 给个几块钱的coupon。2$1 mfr, 1 $2mfr, $3 off 15, $10ecb, pay $0.99, got $12.
: 75ecb back.
: 看不懂 mfr,也看不懂ecb什么意思呀

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。