Redian新闻
>
我在雾里祈祷 (转载)
avatar
我在雾里祈祷 (转载)# Poetry - 海棠诗社
m*n
1
我和LD住在一起,都有工作,可以选择file separately吗?
如果file separately,房子的deduction是报谁头上都行是吗?interest等收入也是报
谁头上都行吗?
avatar
s*t
2
【 以下文字转载自 LeisureTime 讨论区 】
发信人: shot (野水横木), 信区: LeisureTime
标 题: 我在雾里祈祷
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 20 12:43:25 2017, 美东)
《吻》
雨中
我们在伞下接吻
这一刻,我们都变成了
爱做梦的水母
被我梦见的海
像空气一样无处不在
被我梦见的鱼
在伞下游来游去
《我在雾里祈祷》
我在雾里祈祷
不知不觉身体就消失了
最后只剩下,雾里
合拢的双手
就像一只贝
消失在大海的深处
没有身体,也没有意志
贝合拢的双手里,捧着
它唯一的心
avatar
J*i
3
MFS is generally less preferrable because of narrow brackets, less/no credit
deduction, and the rule that both spouses have to take either standard or
itemized deduction.
the only time it might work is when one spouse has a lot of deduction (
medical, 2% AGI deduction etc.)
avatar
m*n
4
是,因为我们一起file会hit AMT,所以觉得不如让一个人去AMT,另一个人可以有效的
itemize
这样的话可以seperate file吗?
引一个论坛里的留言,评论MFS是否一定比MFJ差
Is this conventional wisdom changing in recent years by the increasing
applicability of AMT? E.g., assume a husband and wife with no kids and make
approx 325k and 150k respectively with approx 55k of deductions. Many
credits and deductions unavailable or phased out. Comparing MFJ return on
TurboTax with mock MFS returns (using TurboTax's What-If workheet), MFJ
appears to have a higher aggregate (after AMT) tax burden than MFS by
approximately $900. Runs against conventional wisdom I've read here and
elsewhere; does this sound plausible?; have you seen this or heard of others
with similar experience?

credit

【在 J*****i 的大作中提到】
: MFS is generally less preferrable because of narrow brackets, less/no credit
: deduction, and the rule that both spouses have to take either standard or
: itemized deduction.
: the only time it might work is when one spouse has a lot of deduction (
: medical, 2% AGI deduction etc.)

avatar
J*i
5
Intereting. Run both scenarios and see which is more beneficial. I'm just a
little concerned about moving income (assuming join acct.) to one and
deduction to another. Generally joint income and deductions are split half
and half on MFS unless you can justify that it belong to one specifically.
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。