The main flaw of this article, it seems to me, is that the author confused his opinion with facts. He derived his rationale based on these personal opinions as if they are facts. One example is his claim that art community is "biased against art solely founded in aesthetics". Another is "art for art's sake". These opinions are probably formed from his own casual observations rather than thorough studies of the subjects, which if he did, might have given him very different views.