looking for a compact C/VC++ compiler; any recommendations?# Programming - 葵花宝典
z*7
1 楼
To meet the requirement of some commerical applications, we need some very
compact C/C++, which should be:
1). Small in size, the smaller the better, the greener the merrier (Ideally
the compiler should not require installation process to become workable).
2). Can compile to both x86 and x86-64 programs, targetting both Windows and
Linux platforms.
3).The complier will only be used to compile very short C/C++ programs (e.g.
no more than 20 lines), but the compilie time should be as short as
possible (which is a critical requirement.)
4). All its features should be enable to be set through command-line inputs
(well every compiler can do this I guess).
5). Have easy accessible configuration files.
6). Can accept Boost and popular math libraries.
7). I don't need advanced C++ features (e.g. C++/99).
8). In terms of code-optimization, if the compiler can optimize the code, it
is a plus but it is not necessary.
9). Ideally it's best if it's free for redistrubation, but liscence-fee is
also acceptable, however we prefer a once-and-for-all payment method instead
of per-item/copy method.
We get a in-house product, but are open to other options, free or not. Many
thanks in advance.
compact C/C++, which should be:
1). Small in size, the smaller the better, the greener the merrier (Ideally
the compiler should not require installation process to become workable).
2). Can compile to both x86 and x86-64 programs, targetting both Windows and
Linux platforms.
3).The complier will only be used to compile very short C/C++ programs (e.g.
no more than 20 lines), but the compilie time should be as short as
possible (which is a critical requirement.)
4). All its features should be enable to be set through command-line inputs
(well every compiler can do this I guess).
5). Have easy accessible configuration files.
6). Can accept Boost and popular math libraries.
7). I don't need advanced C++ features (e.g. C++/99).
8). In terms of code-optimization, if the compiler can optimize the code, it
is a plus but it is not necessary.
9). Ideally it's best if it's free for redistrubation, but liscence-fee is
also acceptable, however we prefer a once-and-for-all payment method instead
of per-item/copy method.
We get a in-house product, but are open to other options, free or not. Many
thanks in advance.
