cnn的最权威的那个review是？# Programming - 葵花宝典
h*z
1 楼
小弟博后中，在办绿卡。前几天把PhD老板(白人普通教授，人还算比较严谨）的
reference letter draft写好发给了他。因为自己phd工作做的还不错，当时老板推荐
博后位置时，对我说给我写了"extremely strong reference letter"，后来博后期间
也稍微有点小合作，一直关系良好。这回写绿卡reference letter的draft时就稍微大
胆了一点，对某个工作，声称自己的方法得到某种物质的最低检测限。其实我们的文章
本身并没这么声称，当时也没在乎是不是最低，因为毕竟检测物只是一种广泛用于我们
这个研究的标准物质而已，就算最低也算不上多大进展，只不过显示方法sensitive而
已。现在这么写只是基于一直以来我对文献的追踪，并没看到比自己更低的检测限。但
这个确实也不敢打包票。反正我就这么写了给他了，他改完后把签了字的pdf发了过来
（几乎没怎么改），信里说：
I made some small changes to the letter. My only concern is your comment
that we analyzed the lowest amount of XXX to date. I am surprised by this.
Can you justify this sentence? If so, the letter is ok as I am sending it.
If not, I should delete a sentence or two.
我回信说，This is just my own knowledge based on continuously following
literature during Ph.D study. There could be lower ones in some papers that
I haven't read. 然后又附上一篇近期review article，跟他说，文章里一个Table显
示几年来20篇类似文章里，我们的这个物质检测线是最低的。然后建议，a safer
claim could be "A review article published in 2013 suggests that this amount
is probably the lowest detection limit of XXX using YYY technique." 回信最
后说，You can also revise it in other ways or just delete the "lowest amount
". This letter still looks great even without this claim.
过了好几天了老板也没回信，这是认可了我声称的最低检测吗？还是不高兴了？不想跟
老板弄僵关系，要不要再发信问问他啥意见？
reference letter draft写好发给了他。因为自己phd工作做的还不错，当时老板推荐
博后位置时，对我说给我写了"extremely strong reference letter"，后来博后期间
也稍微有点小合作，一直关系良好。这回写绿卡reference letter的draft时就稍微大
胆了一点，对某个工作，声称自己的方法得到某种物质的最低检测限。其实我们的文章
本身并没这么声称，当时也没在乎是不是最低，因为毕竟检测物只是一种广泛用于我们
这个研究的标准物质而已，就算最低也算不上多大进展，只不过显示方法sensitive而
已。现在这么写只是基于一直以来我对文献的追踪，并没看到比自己更低的检测限。但
这个确实也不敢打包票。反正我就这么写了给他了，他改完后把签了字的pdf发了过来
（几乎没怎么改），信里说：
I made some small changes to the letter. My only concern is your comment
that we analyzed the lowest amount of XXX to date. I am surprised by this.
Can you justify this sentence? If so, the letter is ok as I am sending it.
If not, I should delete a sentence or two.
我回信说，This is just my own knowledge based on continuously following
literature during Ph.D study. There could be lower ones in some papers that
I haven't read. 然后又附上一篇近期review article，跟他说，文章里一个Table显
示几年来20篇类似文章里，我们的这个物质检测线是最低的。然后建议，a safer
claim could be "A review article published in 2013 suggests that this amount
is probably the lowest detection limit of XXX using YYY technique." 回信最
后说，You can also revise it in other ways or just delete the "lowest amount
". This letter still looks great even without this claim.
过了好几天了老板也没回信，这是认可了我声称的最低检测吗？还是不高兴了？不想跟
老板弄僵关系，要不要再发信问问他啥意见？
