And in the end, it's innovation that wins. Always. (ZZ) - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>StartUp - 创业

And in the end, it's innovation that wins. Always. (ZZ)

And in the end, it's innovation that wins. Always. (ZZ)# StartUp - 创业

c*u2007-01-25 08:01

1 楼

Current Articles |
Web 2.0: On Bubbles and Business Models
digg it | reddit | del.icio.us | StumbleUpon
As I’ve noted on many earlier occasions, a lot of the best content on this
blog are reader contributions via their comments. If I were you, I’d be
looking at some of the comments to the more “strategic” articles as there
’s usually one or two comments that are really insightful.
This week, in response to my “Commercializing Web 2.0: Hype vs. Reality”
article, I received what has been to

c*u2007-01-25 08:01

2 楼

The article is zz from onstartups.com
I think it is good article, even I don't completely agree with author's
opinion on web 2.0, I do applause for his comment "it's innovation that wins
".
I had a kinda long talk with one of my classmate today on similar topic. To
my knowledge this friend of mine is probably the first person "invented" ez
card reader for copying game to gameboy - a once really popular handhold
game device. He made pretty handsome money by doing that. I think his first
business

e*a2007-01-25 08:01

3 楼

I'm actually thinking the other way around:
It does NOT matter if you are the inventor / innovator or the copier, it only matters
how good you are when running a business. An inventor who runs business in a
less efficient way will lose, so will a whole bunch of copiers. Thus, being
an inventor only gives you a couple of months of advantage, and that's it.

wins
To
ez
first
But

【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】

: The article is zz from onstartups.com
: I think it is good article, even I don't completely agree with author's
: opinion on web 2.0, I do applause for his comment "it's innovation that wins
: ".
: I had a kinda long talk with one of my classmate today on similar topic. To
: my knowledge this friend of mine is probably the first person "invented" ez
: card reader for copying game to gameboy - a once really popular handhold
: game device. He made pretty handsome money by doing that. I think his first
: business

C*t2007-01-25 08:01

4 楼

我觉得这里讲的是核心技术，这个还是很重要的，不管你营销水平如何，这个market
advantage很少有人超越。
至于平时一些比较novel的idea, 很容易copy, 也就要看sale/management水平了。
idea不完全等同于 technology.

only matters
a
being

【在 e****a 的大作中提到】

: I'm actually thinking the other way around:
: It does NOT matter if you are the inventor / innovator or the copier, it only matters
: how good you are when running a business. An inventor who runs business in a
: less efficient way will lose, so will a whole bunch of copiers. Thus, being
: an inventor only gives you a couple of months of advantage, and that's it.
:
: wins
: To
: ez
: first

ET2007-01-25 08:01

5 楼

the founder of the onstartup.com is an Indian, am I right?

this
there
”

【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】

: Current Articles |
: Web 2.0: On Bubbles and Business Models
: digg it | reddit | del.icio.us | StumbleUpon
: As I’ve noted on many earlier occasions, a lot of the best content on this
: blog are reader contributions via their comments. If I were you, I’d be
: looking at some of the comments to the more “strategic” articles as there
: ’s usually one or two comments that are really insightful.
: This week, in response to my “Commercializing Web 2.0: Hype vs. Reality”
: article, I received what has been to

e*a2007-01-25 08:01

6 楼

看来还是理解不同.我看到innovation的反应是改良,而invention才是比较重大的发明.
重大的发明一般地说是很难遇到的,所以如果有,而且商业上有用,那么就是你说的
advantage.而innovation,则是见仁见智的,不过innovation比较容易,而且可以持续的
进行.但是单个的innovation给一家企业的优势就没有那么明显了,需要持续的进行.

【在 C*****t 的大作中提到】

: 我觉得这里讲的是核心技术，这个还是很重要的，不管你营销水平如何，这个market
: advantage很少有人超越。
: 至于平时一些比较novel的idea, 很容易copy, 也就要看sale/management水平了。
: idea不完全等同于 technology.
:
: only matters
: a
: being

c*u2007-01-25 08:01

7 楼

innovation我的理解是创新.不过要做创新,就要有投入,所以如果很容易被盗版就不合
算了,因为利润可以被压得很低,不能justify投入. 现在基本上什么都是可以都可以盗
的,至少技术上.