avatar
快到1155了# Stock
j*g
1
孩子刚上初中,最近就报了个补习班,想着说课后补习一下相应科目,有些不懂的问题
或者作业遇到什么问题都可以有人教。看大家都报,咱们也不能落下。
但是孩子那个不情愿啊,搞得我没辙了。
孩子差不多同龄的家长你们都是什么情况?我看中国的亲戚们说,现在中国网络辅导也
很流行。反正孩子在中美都脱离不了补习。
avatar
f*u
2
请大家给议员写信的时候不要攻击印度人种,别留下种族歧视话柄,应该反对ICC。为
了长远的国人利益,反对这个HR1044。
avatar
r*7
3
还有4点...
avatar
s*1
4
同感 整天想方设法找他感兴趣的来引导学习。
最近有朋友给我推荐了一个studygate的课程辅导网站,有次孩子考前有物理问题不懂
就上去找了一个老师一对一辅导,感觉至少孩子对这种学习方式还挺感兴趣的 遇到不
会的时候再找辅导 比逼他每周几次去上辅导班好像好一点
avatar
A*a
5
同意 提h1b abuse和diversity就好
avatar
z*a
6
大家写反对信可以参考一下这篇文章, 这个文章写的比较有理有据:
https://cis.org/North/View-Left-HR-1044-Trumps-Tax-Bill-Gift-Haves
The bill favors four already lucky groups of Haves while disadvantaging
everyone else:
1.the high-tech industries that use the H-1B program to increase their
already high profits;
2. the big city (notably Manhattan) real estate developers in the EB-5
program;
3.rich Chinese in the same immigrant investor program; and
4.upper crust Indian nationals in the H-1B program.
The Total Losers, and What they Lose
1.American Workers. Any program change that strengthens the H-1B program,
which has close to a million semi-indentured workers in it, means that fewer
citizens and green card holders are hired in these reasonably well-paying
jobs.
2.American Investors. The principal use of EB-5 funds is to provide what is
known in the trade as "mezzanine financing", that is loans without liens, to
big city real estate developers; routinely EB-5 investors get 1 or at most
2 percent for their money, while the market rate is as high as 10 percent.
So U.S. investors are being shunned in favor of EB-5 ones.
I must say that this is not a population to spend many tears on; these are
passive investors who probably do not know that they are being discriminated
against as they have many other investment opportunities. Though I have
been writing about EB-5 for years, it did not dawn on me until recently that
this was a group hurt by the program; it certainly is not an organized
group.
3.Would-be immigrants from the rest of the world. Generally, for every HR-
1044-favored would-be migrant who would get a visa faster there is a non-
favored would-be migrant who will have to wait much longer than previously.
These are in both employment-based and in family-based migrant categories,
so if you are an Argentinian, a Belizean, a Canadian or a Dane, or an
Estonian or a Fijian, and you have a green card visa waiting for you, HR-
1044 will set back your dreams for years.
avatar
a*g
7
是的,现在很多美国人对中国人不怀好意,他们才不管国家之间怎么竞争。千万别说什
么这个法案对中国人不公平之类的话。可能那些原本观点中立的美国人,听到这个法案
对中国人不利,会转而支持这个法案。
就说这个法案不利于"美国优先"的原则,会加剧h1b滥用,会让更多的美国人失去工作
。会让更多有才能的人被踢出美国,而那些造假的人留在美国,跟总统提的merit-
based移民原则相悖。并且这个法案也不利于多样性。
别的我也不知道了。
avatar
s*0
8
不要和种族啥的扯上关系。就事论事,要符合西方人思维方式。
以前逼迫美国人training 准备outsource的外籍员工不是最好的例子?
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。