j*7
2 楼
都不大成立， 尤其是２，失去了的工作岗位是永远都回不来的。
s*e
3 楼
2. companies have to pay more to hire people, profit will decline which will
lead to a smaller labor force or less salary
lead to a smaller labor force or less salary
f*t
4 楼
美国东西好出口? all US have you can find cheaper one in China...lol
Tell me something US have and China does not...
xoxoxo
【在 w****k 的大作中提到】
: 1、美国东西好出口了
: 2、外包成本高了，那意愿就弱。有利于保住工作。
Tell me something US have and China does not...
xoxoxo
【在 w****k 的大作中提到】
: 1、美国东西好出口了
: 2、外包成本高了，那意愿就弱。有利于保住工作。
l*r
5 楼
iPad
【在 f*******t 的大作中提到】
: 美国东西好出口? all US have you can find cheaper one in China...lol
: Tell me something US have and China does not...
: xoxoxo
【在 f*******t 的大作中提到】
: 美国东西好出口? all US have you can find cheaper one in China...lol
: Tell me something US have and China does not...
: xoxoxo
f*t
6 楼
we will have San zai version very soon, with similar function and 1/3 of the price...lol
【在 l*******r 的大作中提到】
: iPad
【在 l*******r 的大作中提到】
: iPad
h*a
7 楼
那今天咋跌了呢？
w*k
8 楼
这个问题应该这么看
有工作的人多了，那么有钱消费的人就多了，公司生产的东西就卖得出去了
正向循环
老福特给自己工人开高工资，汽车反而卖得多了。就是这么个道理。
靠砍人，削减工资，那都不是长久之计
will
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: 2. companies have to pay more to hire people, profit will decline which will
: lead to a smaller labor force or less salary
有工作的人多了，那么有钱消费的人就多了，公司生产的东西就卖得出去了
正向循环
老福特给自己工人开高工资，汽车反而卖得多了。就是这么个道理。
靠砍人，削减工资，那都不是长久之计
will
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: 2. companies have to pay more to hire people, profit will decline which will
: lead to a smaller labor force or less salary
w*k
9 楼
不是高开那么多了么？
今天跌和人民币没关系。最近一个礼拜，涨了那么多，本来也该回调了
【在 h*********a 的大作中提到】
: 那今天咋跌了呢？
今天跌和人民币没关系。最近一个礼拜，涨了那么多，本来也该回调了
【在 h*********a 的大作中提到】
: 那今天咋跌了呢？
s*e
10 楼
The trouble is whether there'll be more jobs created. You may find more
people are laid off than gained in lot of other areas not benefited or disadvantaged simply because everybody and every company
have to spend more on their living necessities and raw industrial components
【在 w****k 的大作中提到】
: 这个问题应该这么看
: 有工作的人多了，那么有钱消费的人就多了，公司生产的东西就卖得出去了
: 正向循环
: 老福特给自己工人开高工资，汽车反而卖得多了。就是这么个道理。
: 靠砍人，削减工资，那都不是长久之计
:
: will
people are laid off than gained in lot of other areas not benefited or disadvantaged simply because everybody and every company
have to spend more on their living necessities and raw industrial components
【在 w****k 的大作中提到】
: 这个问题应该这么看
: 有工作的人多了，那么有钱消费的人就多了，公司生产的东西就卖得出去了
: 正向循环
: 老福特给自己工人开高工资，汽车反而卖得多了。就是这么个道理。
: 靠砍人，削减工资，那都不是长久之计
:
: will
g*a
11 楼
最起码在我从事的这个行业我觉得工作机会在增加
components
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: The trouble is whether there'll be more jobs created. You may find more
: people are laid off than gained in lot of other areas not benefited or disadvantaged simply because everybody and every company
: have to spend more on their living necessities and raw industrial components
:
components
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: The trouble is whether there'll be more jobs created. You may find more
: people are laid off than gained in lot of other areas not benefited or disadvantaged simply because everybody and every company
: have to spend more on their living necessities and raw industrial components
:
s*n
12 楼
Prostitute?
h*7
13 楼
人民币升值一个直接的影响就是抬高美国的物价。那么多从中国进口的商品都会涨价。
说白了，美国制造的东西根本不够美国人用。
说白了，美国制造的东西根本不够美国人用。
f*t
14 楼
exactly.
【在 h****7 的大作中提到】
: 人民币升值一个直接的影响就是抬高美国的物价。那么多从中国进口的商品都会涨价。
: 说白了，美国制造的东西根本不够美国人用。
【在 h****7 的大作中提到】
: 人民币升值一个直接的影响就是抬高美国的物价。那么多从中国进口的商品都会涨价。
: 说白了，美国制造的东西根本不够美国人用。
h*g
15 楼
You will see Dollar rising accompanied with Yuan appreciation. By any means,it is not a good thing to US. The one can take advantage of that will only be EU countries. This is the sad side of a democratic story. All kinds of politician tend to call cheap shots while nobody care to really dig into it.
BTW, outsourcing is not the problem now. Job creation is. Bush Senior and
Clinton had IT, Reagon had Star War. What does O8 get? Nothing!
Job will not so easy to be out of mainland China. Normally p
BTW, outsourcing is not the problem now. Job creation is. Bush Senior and
Clinton had IT, Reagon had Star War. What does O8 get? Nothing!
Job will not so easy to be out of mainland China. Normally p
相关阅读