C*a
2 楼
U would not win if you always all-in one stock, no matter how good it is.
Diversification is the key to survive this market.
Diversification is the key to survive this market.
u*e
3 楼
Your opinion is right as long as one can make the diversity right. But the
fact is almost no small player can really do it right, at least I am not
one of them. In the past 5 years I lost >50 grands due to this diversity
mystery and made up them all this year by my "concentrated" strategy. I
won't even consider it before my account reach 1M.
is.
【在 C****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: U would not win if you always all-in one stock, no matter how good it is.
: Diversification is the key to survive this market.
fact is almost no small player can really do it right, at least I am not
one of them. In the past 5 years I lost >50 grands due to this diversity
mystery and made up them all this year by my "concentrated" strategy. I
won't even consider it before my account reach 1M.
is.
【在 C****a 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: U would not win if you always all-in one stock, no matter how good it is.
: Diversification is the key to survive this market.
u*e
4 楼
All-in is dangerous for sure, but if you can manage to stick to the rule,
it is controllable. I set very narrow stop for all transaction, so the
entry points should be selected very carefully, eg. low risk/profit as
possible. The consequence is that I can only see no more than one/two
trading chance, which limits the number of transaction. As for my
experience, for small account, the more you trade, the more you loss.
it is controllable. I set very narrow stop for all transaction, so the
entry points should be selected very carefully, eg. low risk/profit as
possible. The consequence is that I can only see no more than one/two
trading chance, which limits the number of transaction. As for my
experience, for small account, the more you trade, the more you loss.
相关阅读