Amazon 还会跌一下# Stock
t*r
1 楼
没承认我的contribution
理由很可笑，说我只列了letters of support,和list of publications with
associated google scholar.
我列的其他的被丫华丽丽的忽视了，然后还让我提交，这IO是在梦中审的吗？
下面是给我RFE的理由：
Evidence of of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
You submitted letters of support and a list of your publications with
associated citations in Google Scholar. But your citatory history does not
demonstrate contributions of major significance in the field. To assist in
determining whether your contributions are original and of major
significance in the field, you may assist:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
your work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss your
contributions of major significance.
Evidence that your major significant contribution(s) has provoked widespread
public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence if your work being implemented by other. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies using your products；
Licenced technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shwon to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about your contribution and must explain, in detail, how the
contribution was "oridginal" (not merely replicating the work of others) and
how they were of "major" significance. General statements regarding the
importance of the endeavors which are not supported by documentary evidence
are important.
理由很可笑，说我只列了letters of support,和list of publications with
associated google scholar.
我列的其他的被丫华丽丽的忽视了，然后还让我提交，这IO是在梦中审的吗？
下面是给我RFE的理由：
Evidence of of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
You submitted letters of support and a list of your publications with
associated citations in Google Scholar. But your citatory history does not
demonstrate contributions of major significance in the field. To assist in
determining whether your contributions are original and of major
significance in the field, you may assist:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
your work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss your
contributions of major significance.
Evidence that your major significant contribution(s) has provoked widespread
public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence if your work being implemented by other. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies using your products；
Licenced technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shwon to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about your contribution and must explain, in detail, how the
contribution was "oridginal" (not merely replicating the work of others) and
how they were of "major" significance. General statements regarding the
importance of the endeavors which are not supported by documentary evidence
are important.
