PWRD还能不能往上走？# Stock
a*t
1 楼
全部是科学类的EB1-A, 以老三样相关为主, 尤其是"original contributions of
major significance"的论证
google case number看pdf全文
### Apr012010_01B2203
* 客观证据比推荐信有说服力 "Even when written by independent experts,
letters solicited by an alien in support of an immigration petition are of
less weight than preexisting, independent evidence of original contributions
of major significance."
### Apr042011_02B2203
* 奖学金不算"奖" "Academic study is not a field of endeavor, but training
for a future field of endeavor. As such, academic scholarships, student
award, postdoctoral fellowships. and financial aid awards cannot be
considered nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards in the
petitioner's field of endeavor."
* "As such, we are unable to determine if any of these citations are self-
citations by the petitioner or his co-authors."
* 推荐信里要讲清楚contribution - support letter "failed to indicate how many
times the article has been cited", "failed to indicate if this article was
ever cited", "failed to identify the name of the article"
* 什么是客观证据 "The petitioner failed to submit any documentary evidence
demonstrating that his articles have been unusually influential, such as
articles that discuss in-depth the petitioner's findings or credit the
petitioner with influencing or impacting the field."
* 光被引用是不够的 "Merely submitting documentation reflecting that the
petitioner's work has been cited by others in their published material is
insufficient."
* 推荐信里的空洞好话是没用的 "While the recommendation letters praise the
petitioner for his work, they fail to indicate that his contributions are of
*major significance* in the field."
* 未成事实不能用来证明卓越贡献 "*could* affect", "*may* leave behind" - "
Clearly, the significance of the petitioner's work has yet to be determined
on the field."
* "Without evidence indicating the petitioner's work is already being
applied in the field, the petitioner cannot establish eligibility for this
criterion based on possible or speculative outcomes."
* 贡献得有广泛影响 "The recommendation letters reflect that the petitioner
has made original contributions based on his research. However, the letters
fail to indicate that his contributions are of major significance in the
field."
* 未成事实没有用 "Eligibility must be established at the time of filing."
* 空话没有用 "We are not persuaded by vague, solicited letters that simply
repeat the regulatory language but do not explain how the petitioner's
contributions have already influenced the field."
* "Even when written by independent experts, letters solicited by an alien
in support of an immigration petition are of less weight than preexisting,
independent evidence of original contributions of major significance."
### APR142015_02B2203
* wiki页面没有用 "As there are no assurances about the reliability of the
content from this open, user-edited Internet site, the materials from
Wikipedia have no evidentiary weight."
* 卓越贡献的证据来自于对别人的影响 "Typically, in considering whether a
published work is a contribution of major significance, we look at the
impact the work has had after publication."
### JAN122015_02B2203
* 未成事实没有用 "Future prospective benefits that the petitioner's findings
may have in the field will not qualify her under this criterion. The
regulation requires that the petitioner has already made major and
significant impacts within the field."
* 推荐人口说无凭没有用 "Regarding whether the petitioner is well cited,
USCIS is not required to accept primarily conclusory assertions as factual
statements."
* 引用数可能会和citing article的引用数来比 "Notably, the citation results
the petitioner submitted include the citation numbers for other articles,
including two articles that are contemporaneous with the petitioner's
articles but have garnered nine and ten times as many citations in the same
period of time."
* 要展示引用的硬证据 "Dr. X does not provide the title of the published work
that he claims is very well cited and will always be referenced. Such
assertions and general claims are not evidence."
### JAN262015_02B2203
* 未成事实没有用 "The appaellate brief provides a list of manuscripts by the
petitioner with publication and presentation dates that postdate the filing
date of the petition, Jun 25, 2013. Even if the petitioner provided
documentation of these works, which he has not, this evidence did not exist
at the time the petitioner filed the present petition. A petitioner must
establish the elements for the approval of the petition at the time of
filing."
### JAN262015_03B2203
* 文章不能证明对别人的影响 "The petitioner's authorship of materials alone,
without evidence of the materials' impact in the field, is insufficient to
establish that the petitioner meets this criterion."
* 推荐人的空话没有用 "Conclusory statements that lack details on why the
petitioner's work was original or how it impacted the field as a whole are
insufficient to establish that the petitioner has met this criterion."
* 未成事实没有用 "Evidence that the petitioner may in the future impact the
field is not sufficient to establish that the petitioner has met this
criterion, which requires evidence that the petitioner has already made
original contributions of major significance in the field."
* "The evidence that the petitioner's work has **'inspired'** the work of
another is insufficient to establish the impact of the petitioner's work in
the field."
* 个例没有用, 得有广泛影响才行 "Evidence of Mr. X's appreciation of the
petitioner's work is insufficient to show the impact of the petitioner's
work in the field. This evidence shows that certain people, including Mr. X
have found value and interest in the petitioner's work. This, however, is
insufficient to show a wider impact of the petitioner's work in the field as
whole consistent with a contribution of major significance.
还有更多 回头再发
major significance"的论证
google case number看pdf全文
### Apr012010_01B2203
* 客观证据比推荐信有说服力 "Even when written by independent experts,
letters solicited by an alien in support of an immigration petition are of
less weight than preexisting, independent evidence of original contributions
of major significance."
### Apr042011_02B2203
* 奖学金不算"奖" "Academic study is not a field of endeavor, but training
for a future field of endeavor. As such, academic scholarships, student
award, postdoctoral fellowships. and financial aid awards cannot be
considered nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards in the
petitioner's field of endeavor."
* "As such, we are unable to determine if any of these citations are self-
citations by the petitioner or his co-authors."
* 推荐信里要讲清楚contribution - support letter "failed to indicate how many
times the article has been cited", "failed to indicate if this article was
ever cited", "failed to identify the name of the article"
* 什么是客观证据 "The petitioner failed to submit any documentary evidence
demonstrating that his articles have been unusually influential, such as
articles that discuss in-depth the petitioner's findings or credit the
petitioner with influencing or impacting the field."
* 光被引用是不够的 "Merely submitting documentation reflecting that the
petitioner's work has been cited by others in their published material is
insufficient."
* 推荐信里的空洞好话是没用的 "While the recommendation letters praise the
petitioner for his work, they fail to indicate that his contributions are of
*major significance* in the field."
* 未成事实不能用来证明卓越贡献 "*could* affect", "*may* leave behind" - "
Clearly, the significance of the petitioner's work has yet to be determined
on the field."
* "Without evidence indicating the petitioner's work is already being
applied in the field, the petitioner cannot establish eligibility for this
criterion based on possible or speculative outcomes."
* 贡献得有广泛影响 "The recommendation letters reflect that the petitioner
has made original contributions based on his research. However, the letters
fail to indicate that his contributions are of major significance in the
field."
* 未成事实没有用 "Eligibility must be established at the time of filing."
* 空话没有用 "We are not persuaded by vague, solicited letters that simply
repeat the regulatory language but do not explain how the petitioner's
contributions have already influenced the field."
* "Even when written by independent experts, letters solicited by an alien
in support of an immigration petition are of less weight than preexisting,
independent evidence of original contributions of major significance."
### APR142015_02B2203
* wiki页面没有用 "As there are no assurances about the reliability of the
content from this open, user-edited Internet site, the materials from
Wikipedia have no evidentiary weight."
* 卓越贡献的证据来自于对别人的影响 "Typically, in considering whether a
published work is a contribution of major significance, we look at the
impact the work has had after publication."
### JAN122015_02B2203
* 未成事实没有用 "Future prospective benefits that the petitioner's findings
may have in the field will not qualify her under this criterion. The
regulation requires that the petitioner has already made major and
significant impacts within the field."
* 推荐人口说无凭没有用 "Regarding whether the petitioner is well cited,
USCIS is not required to accept primarily conclusory assertions as factual
statements."
* 引用数可能会和citing article的引用数来比 "Notably, the citation results
the petitioner submitted include the citation numbers for other articles,
including two articles that are contemporaneous with the petitioner's
articles but have garnered nine and ten times as many citations in the same
period of time."
* 要展示引用的硬证据 "Dr. X does not provide the title of the published work
that he claims is very well cited and will always be referenced. Such
assertions and general claims are not evidence."
### JAN262015_02B2203
* 未成事实没有用 "The appaellate brief provides a list of manuscripts by the
petitioner with publication and presentation dates that postdate the filing
date of the petition, Jun 25, 2013. Even if the petitioner provided
documentation of these works, which he has not, this evidence did not exist
at the time the petitioner filed the present petition. A petitioner must
establish the elements for the approval of the petition at the time of
filing."
### JAN262015_03B2203
* 文章不能证明对别人的影响 "The petitioner's authorship of materials alone,
without evidence of the materials' impact in the field, is insufficient to
establish that the petitioner meets this criterion."
* 推荐人的空话没有用 "Conclusory statements that lack details on why the
petitioner's work was original or how it impacted the field as a whole are
insufficient to establish that the petitioner has met this criterion."
* 未成事实没有用 "Evidence that the petitioner may in the future impact the
field is not sufficient to establish that the petitioner has met this
criterion, which requires evidence that the petitioner has already made
original contributions of major significance in the field."
* "The evidence that the petitioner's work has **'inspired'** the work of
another is insufficient to establish the impact of the petitioner's work in
the field."
* 个例没有用, 得有广泛影响才行 "Evidence of Mr. X's appreciation of the
petitioner's work is insufficient to show the impact of the petitioner's
work in the field. This evidence shows that certain people, including Mr. X
have found value and interest in the petitioner's work. This, however, is
insufficient to show a wider impact of the petitioner's work in the field as
whole consistent with a contribution of major significance.
还有更多 回头再发
