历史就是这样，凡出兵啊富汗者，均以衰落告终。# Stock
m*3
1 楼
本人农业工程14年的博士，毕业后在公司做研发。13英文文章＋4篇中文文章（其中13
篇是一作或者二作），其中6篇英文发在领域内引用排名第一的杂志，有两篇英文在web
of science 的引用是top 0.1%，有两篇文章在top 1%，另外5篇文章在top 10%；
Google scholar 129个引用，CNKI44个引用，审稿近50；共6 封推荐信，2封非独立包
括博士老板和项目合作者，四封独立来自美，法，中，埃及（都是引用文章的）。
NSC EB-1A PP 11 天收到RFE from 0214，承认了authorship和审稿，不承认original
contributions of major significance in the field.
"the evidence does not establish original contributions of major
significance in a field whose very top scientists, according to Google
Scholar, have garnered citations numbered in the thousands.Additionally, you
submitted baselines-citation rates of Thomas Ruters, showing that a few of
your papers are frequently cited for their published years in the field.
That tool is useful for broadly determining the citatory rates for each
field, but we use Google Scholar" because it allows us to compare your
citatory history with that of scientists with whom you have collaborated,
who have cited you, and, more accurately, who are in your specific field.
Google Scholar shows that scientists who have risen to the very top of your
field have garnered citations numbered in thousands. Since you have been in
the field a short time, it is very difficult for you to have made
contributions of major significance. But the EB1-1 visa classification is
intended for"that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the
field of endeavour"; furthermore, in the final analysis, the initial
evidence must establish that you have "sustained national or international
acclaim and that your achievements have been recognised in the field of
expertise." Response to your publications suggests an auspicious start, but
your original contributions do not yet place you among the very top
scientists of your field.
WE家律师建议撤销申请，据说REF在0214手里过的很少。想听听大家的意见，谢谢。
篇是一作或者二作），其中6篇英文发在领域内引用排名第一的杂志，有两篇英文在web
of science 的引用是top 0.1%，有两篇文章在top 1%，另外5篇文章在top 10%；
Google scholar 129个引用，CNKI44个引用，审稿近50；共6 封推荐信，2封非独立包
括博士老板和项目合作者，四封独立来自美，法，中，埃及（都是引用文章的）。
NSC EB-1A PP 11 天收到RFE from 0214，承认了authorship和审稿，不承认original
contributions of major significance in the field.
"the evidence does not establish original contributions of major
significance in a field whose very top scientists, according to Google
Scholar, have garnered citations numbered in the thousands.Additionally, you
submitted baselines-citation rates of Thomas Ruters, showing that a few of
your papers are frequently cited for their published years in the field.
That tool is useful for broadly determining the citatory rates for each
field, but we use Google Scholar" because it allows us to compare your
citatory history with that of scientists with whom you have collaborated,
who have cited you, and, more accurately, who are in your specific field.
Google Scholar shows that scientists who have risen to the very top of your
field have garnered citations numbered in thousands. Since you have been in
the field a short time, it is very difficult for you to have made
contributions of major significance. But the EB1-1 visa classification is
intended for"that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the
field of endeavour"; furthermore, in the final analysis, the initial
evidence must establish that you have "sustained national or international
acclaim and that your achievements have been recognised in the field of
expertise." Response to your publications suggests an auspicious start, but
your original contributions do not yet place you among the very top
scientists of your field.
WE家律师建议撤销申请，据说REF在0214手里过的很少。想听听大家的意见，谢谢。
