Redian新闻
>
no one talks about this? The Hindenburg Omen
avatar
no one talks about this? The Hindenburg Omen# Stock
f*g
1
连每年例行的买75送20%胖子,和target gc 10% off的黑五常规deal都没了。
哎,王小二过年,一年不如一年啊。
avatar
v*e
3
gc 10% 不是说12月4号么?
感觉现在店里打击resell都很给力呀
avatar
B*n
4
Since Fed started the printing press, Hindenburg Omen had stopped working.
It makes me wonder what is the motive of the media to mention it now.
hehe
avatar
f*g
5
哦,没看到,让俺去看看。

【在 v******e 的大作中提到】
: gc 10% 不是说12月4号么?
: 感觉现在店里打击resell都很给力呀

avatar
N*L
6
combined with the rumor that qe tapering
what would happen

【在 B*******n 的大作中提到】
: Since Fed started the printing press, Hindenburg Omen had stopped working.
: It makes me wonder what is the motive of the media to mention it now.
: hehe

avatar
t*n
7
看到了吗?今年究竟有没有?

【在 f****g 的大作中提到】
: 哦,没看到,让俺去看看。
avatar
B*n
8
too much sideline money buying the dip, Wall Street is NOT happy.
I start to believe allence's claim, 2013 must be very bullish, just like
1995.

【在 N****L 的大作中提到】
: combined with the rumor that qe tapering
: what would happen

avatar
N*L
9
it is bullish
just wondering how deep this dip can be
what do you think?

【在 B*******n 的大作中提到】
: too much sideline money buying the dip, Wall Street is NOT happy.
: I start to believe allence's claim, 2013 must be very bullish, just like
: 1995.

avatar
B*n
10
目测1580,硬币没找到。

【在 N****L 的大作中提到】
: it is bullish
: just wondering how deep this dip can be
: what do you think?

avatar
r*e
11
how good is this indicator? I don't think it's very reliable.
avatar
B*n
12
I just said, it stopped working long time ago after Fed started QE. From
2009 to now, Omen had happened several times; every time it was a bear-trap.

【在 r***e 的大作中提到】
: how good is this indicator? I don't think it's very reliable.
avatar
N*L
13
it is said to be pretty good for predicting 5% dips, which from now looks
pretty likely. and a lot bears will be trapped. only a few times did panic
sellouts happen.

trap.

【在 B*******n 的大作中提到】
: I just said, it stopped working long time ago after Fed started QE. From
: 2009 to now, Omen had happened several times; every time it was a bear-trap.

avatar
B*n
14
That's why I predict 1580.

【在 N****L 的大作中提到】
: it is said to be pretty good for predicting 5% dips, which from now looks
: pretty likely. and a lot bears will be trapped. only a few times did panic
: sellouts happen.
:
: trap.

avatar
N*L
15
exactly
big wet niubility!

【在 B*******n 的大作中提到】
: That's why I predict 1580.
avatar
m*9
16
这个应该比较靠谱~
1550±100
avatar
B*r
17
A 5% drop only gives us 1600. If I have to bet, it may just break 1600
intraday only.

【在 B*******n 的大作中提到】
: That's why I predict 1580.
avatar
r*e
18
the reason why I'm not sure is because we don't have any data to prove when
we have this indicator, the market will decline. And the market decline, we
have this indicators.
And even in this article, it says new version is 2.5% of the total listing,
old version is 2.8%. This time is 2.2%. But the argument is valid. The
market is too volatile.
The problem is still there: when?
When the volatile is high we feel something will happen, but when? tmr?next
week? next month? +/-2days is good enough.
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。