o*o
2 楼
好,爆乳
I*e
4 楼
FNMA/FMCC are not investment stocks. They are gamble stocks.
The long term prospect of these two companies are almost perfectly
determined by the congress. Either the congress decides to dismantle both
companies, in which case equity investors are completely wiped out, or they
would vote to restore these companies and give equity holders 10's of
billions of wealth, pretty much all taken from the taxpayers.
Which of these two are likely to come true is completely up to each "
investor/gambler" to figure out (I personally think the congress won't risk
its public image by going the second route.) However, don't fool yourself
into believing there is a middle ground. There is none.
The long term prospect of these two companies are almost perfectly
determined by the congress. Either the congress decides to dismantle both
companies, in which case equity investors are completely wiped out, or they
would vote to restore these companies and give equity holders 10's of
billions of wealth, pretty much all taken from the taxpayers.
Which of these two are likely to come true is completely up to each "
investor/gambler" to figure out (I personally think the congress won't risk
its public image by going the second route.) However, don't fool yourself
into believing there is a middle ground. There is none.
p*y
5 楼
1.5附近建仓
l*u
6 楼
this is almost true.
they
risk
【在 I***e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: FNMA/FMCC are not investment stocks. They are gamble stocks.
: The long term prospect of these two companies are almost perfectly
: determined by the congress. Either the congress decides to dismantle both
: companies, in which case equity investors are completely wiped out, or they
: would vote to restore these companies and give equity holders 10's of
: billions of wealth, pretty much all taken from the taxpayers.
: Which of these two are likely to come true is completely up to each "
: investor/gambler" to figure out (I personally think the congress won't risk
: its public image by going the second route.) However, don't fool yourself
: into believing there is a middle ground. There is none.
they
risk
【在 I***e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: FNMA/FMCC are not investment stocks. They are gamble stocks.
: The long term prospect of these two companies are almost perfectly
: determined by the congress. Either the congress decides to dismantle both
: companies, in which case equity investors are completely wiped out, or they
: would vote to restore these companies and give equity holders 10's of
: billions of wealth, pretty much all taken from the taxpayers.
: Which of these two are likely to come true is completely up to each "
: investor/gambler" to figure out (I personally think the congress won't risk
: its public image by going the second route.) However, don't fool yourself
: into believing there is a middle ground. There is none.
u*n
8 楼
Fnm.sg在德国已开涨7.2%!
继续赌
继续赌
u*n
10 楼
12%了
相关阅读
我是动感超人,向BP发射动感光波!FSLR明天可能有令人牛熊都满意的走势最近nasdaq强的一B今天收平,但money flow out不少满足大家全职炒股的海归好职位LCC真是势不可挡OVTI借着IPHONE4很火呀我看BP见短期底的概率还是挺高的村长,你那个ipad application,能不能发个使用说明?二房大跌,对house market有什么影响?FNM冲不过6毛2,哈哈...我..胡汉三..回来了单边CALL的压力太大脚踏实地才是正道坚决支持大蛤蟆,大S,酒馆,下载版主、板斧!HELP!!!Head or Shoulder, or New Rally?!!!!!bulls bears fight for spinach虎年第十届选股竞赛06/16成绩!还得看油