Redian新闻
>
UGA 和 USO的区别
avatar
UGA 和 USO的区别# Stock
a*i
1
哪个长期持有好啊?
avatar
s*h
2
uga是汽油, uso是原油, 不一样把.
avatar
x*1
3
这2个都分不清楚的,还是不要炒股好了。
avatar
a*i
4
呵呵,是,现在不敢买。
为什么汽油的价格在原油走低后,今年都在上升?
avatar
x*1
5
汽油的需求一直在增大。 汽油库存也不大。 和原油不是一个概念。
avatar
a*i
6
那请问捞油能捞uga吗?
avatar
d*r
7
USO vs. UGA
When it comes to popularity, USO takes the cake. This ETF has accumulated
nearly $1.7 billion in assets under management since launching in 2006,
while UGA has also amassed an impressive $179 million in AUM since 2008. The
underlying differences between crude oil and gasoline futures contracts is
reflected in the expense ratios; USO charges 0.45%, while UGA charges a
steeper 0.60% in fees [see also ETF Tax Tutorial: Complete List Of ETFs That
Issue A K-1].
The fundamental differences between these two energy ETPs is perhaps best
reflected in their performance. Over the past three years, USO and UGA have
exhibited a correlation of above 0.75; in this time frame, USO has gained
approximately 30%, while UGA has tacked on a much more impressive 130% gain
[see UGA Returns]. From a year-to-date perspective, USO is up about 6%,
while UGA has gained nearly 20% [see also Energy Commodity Heatmap].

【在 a*i 的大作中提到】
: 哪个长期持有好啊?
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。