R*g
2 楼
Looked with ScottradeELITE time line, it is exactly at 14:50: almost every
major stock:
aapl, fb, googl, nvda, qcom, amat, asml, lrcx, isrg, avgo, klac, intc etc
had lowest point of the day.
It was the computer targeted trading to certain stocks!!!
MRK, TRV do not show the dip like above.
Update:
The online giant's stock tanked and then quickly came back all within the
minute of 2:50 p.m, according to Bloomberg data. Here's a second-by-second
rundown:
2:50:01 p.m.: $960.55 per share
2:50:02 p.m.: $930.00 per share
2:50:03 p.m.: $953.07 per share
2:50:03.5 p.m.: $927.00 per share
2:50:04 p.m.: $959.27 per share
Most speculation by commentators is that the flash crash was either a so-
called "fat finger" trade or an automated trade, but either way it's pretty
wild.
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge move for a stock that
recently cracked $1,000 per share, but oscillating by almost $35 per share
in the space of 3 seconds is quite a move no matter what the stock is.
major stock:
aapl, fb, googl, nvda, qcom, amat, asml, lrcx, isrg, avgo, klac, intc etc
had lowest point of the day.
It was the computer targeted trading to certain stocks!!!
MRK, TRV do not show the dip like above.
Update:
The online giant's stock tanked and then quickly came back all within the
minute of 2:50 p.m, according to Bloomberg data. Here's a second-by-second
rundown:
2:50:01 p.m.: $960.55 per share
2:50:02 p.m.: $930.00 per share
2:50:03 p.m.: $953.07 per share
2:50:03.5 p.m.: $927.00 per share
2:50:04 p.m.: $959.27 per share
Most speculation by commentators is that the flash crash was either a so-
called "fat finger" trade or an automated trade, but either way it's pretty
wild.
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge move for a stock that
recently cracked $1,000 per share, but oscillating by almost $35 per share
in the space of 3 seconds is quite a move no matter what the stock is.
f*1
3 楼
今天花街的宠儿几大科技神股AAPL, AMZN, FB, GOOG, NFLX齐刷刷地大跌,有点意思。
f*g
5 楼
花街今天猛砸科技股是为啥?而且是无差别的,科技股全砸
也没见任何消息啊,除了NVDA的
也没见任何消息啊,除了NVDA的
R*g
7 楼
Update to my earlier post, saw Bob Bryan wrote at 2pm today (after my post
here)
The online giant's stock tanked and then quickly came back all within the
minute of 2:50 p.m, according to Bloomberg data. Here's a second-by-second
rundown:
2:50:01 p.m.: $960.55 per share
2:50:02 p.m.: $930.00 per share
2:50:03 p.m.: $953.07 per share
2:50:03.5 p.m.: $927.00 per share
2:50:04 p.m.: $959.27 per share
Most speculation by commentators is that the flash crash was either a so-
called "fat finger" trade or an automated trade, but either way it's pretty
wild.
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge move for a stock that
recently cracked $1,000 per share, but oscillating by almost $35 per share
in the space of 3 seconds is quite a move no matter what the stock is.
here)
The online giant's stock tanked and then quickly came back all within the
minute of 2:50 p.m, according to Bloomberg data. Here's a second-by-second
rundown:
2:50:01 p.m.: $960.55 per share
2:50:02 p.m.: $930.00 per share
2:50:03 p.m.: $953.07 per share
2:50:03.5 p.m.: $927.00 per share
2:50:04 p.m.: $959.27 per share
Most speculation by commentators is that the flash crash was either a so-
called "fat finger" trade or an automated trade, but either way it's pretty
wild.
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge move for a stock that
recently cracked $1,000 per share, but oscillating by almost $35 per share
in the space of 3 seconds is quite a move no matter what the stock is.
Q*g
8 楼
I saw these kind of bottom fishing trick many times. All the stop lose
orders were triggered... poor guy
orders were triggered... poor guy
相关阅读