崔永元再次发文怼范冰冰, 别逼我!手里还有其他爆炸性的证据!# TVChinese - 中文电视
B*1
1 楼
误区3:你们反对了这个政策会成为其他少数族裔的敌人,而搬石头砸自己的脚
回答:应该不会。我们赞同高校招生时候考虑申请人的综合素质。综合素质包括申请学
生现在的学术成绩和未来可能的成功潜力,例如申请人是否能在不利的生活环境中仍能
不懈努力等 (i.e. Overcome adversity under socio-economic constraint). 我们相
信这样的定位能给所有的考生提供一个公平竞争的机会,也能给学校足够的弹性来制定
他们的教育的目标。我们认为在高校录取政策上,经济家庭背景(social economic
background)是一个比族裔(race)或种族(ethnicity)更好的录取标准。现有“族
裔优先”政策的真正受益者是住在郊区的有钱西裔和非裔, 因为他们既有不错的成绩
又有正确的肤色。对于市中心贫民窟的穷人孩子没啥帮助。对亚裔的穷孩子更歧视。这
样的政策与美国宪法第14条修正案“公平保障条例” (“Equal Protection Clause”
)是被道而弛的。
- - - - - - - - -
Firstly, 被道而弛 is a typo.
Secondly, I think the above argument is laughable and hipocritical.
1) The argument labels those minority students who were admitted as unworthy
since they are 住在郊区的有钱西裔和非裔, 因为他们既有
不错的成绩又有正确的肤色. But what about those admitted Asian students? Aren't
they 住在郊区的有钱华裔, and hence, unworthy as well? Since when being rich in
America is a sin? Are you implying that even money has colors? You can't cut
it both ways.
2) The argument claims that the current policy 对于市中心贫民窟的穷人孩子没啥帮助。
对亚裔的穷孩子更歧视。Assuming, arguendo, that this is true and AA policy is
abolished. Would the new policy admit MORE 市中心贫民窟的穷人孩子?
Seriously. Use all the prediction models you have and you will not produce a
curve proving improvement in that respect even with the help of Wall Street
cheaters.
3) The sense of self-entitlement due to a high SAT score is as bad as that
due to one's skin color or birthplace.
4) Leaving those less fortunate to rot in hell is fairness at its worst.
5) 你们反对了这个政策会成为其他少数族裔的敌人,而搬石头砸自己的脚. Hello?
Isn't that obvious? For proof, just ask your co-workers who are African American,
Hispanic American, or Native American: "If I support the removal of the race
consideration factor from the college admission process, would you still treat
me as your friend?" And ask why! Get your answers directly from your fellow
minority representatives. Make sure you know where your escape route is.
In God we trust. Everyone else? Bring your argument!
回答:应该不会。我们赞同高校招生时候考虑申请人的综合素质。综合素质包括申请学
生现在的学术成绩和未来可能的成功潜力,例如申请人是否能在不利的生活环境中仍能
不懈努力等 (i.e. Overcome adversity under socio-economic constraint). 我们相
信这样的定位能给所有的考生提供一个公平竞争的机会,也能给学校足够的弹性来制定
他们的教育的目标。我们认为在高校录取政策上,经济家庭背景(social economic
background)是一个比族裔(race)或种族(ethnicity)更好的录取标准。现有“族
裔优先”政策的真正受益者是住在郊区的有钱西裔和非裔, 因为他们既有不错的成绩
又有正确的肤色。对于市中心贫民窟的穷人孩子没啥帮助。对亚裔的穷孩子更歧视。这
样的政策与美国宪法第14条修正案“公平保障条例” (“Equal Protection Clause”
)是被道而弛的。
- - - - - - - - -
Firstly, 被道而弛 is a typo.
Secondly, I think the above argument is laughable and hipocritical.
1) The argument labels those minority students who were admitted as unworthy
since they are 住在郊区的有钱西裔和非裔, 因为他们既有
不错的成绩又有正确的肤色. But what about those admitted Asian students? Aren't
they 住在郊区的有钱华裔, and hence, unworthy as well? Since when being rich in
America is a sin? Are you implying that even money has colors? You can't cut
it both ways.
2) The argument claims that the current policy 对于市中心贫民窟的穷人孩子没啥帮助。
对亚裔的穷孩子更歧视。Assuming, arguendo, that this is true and AA policy is
abolished. Would the new policy admit MORE 市中心贫民窟的穷人孩子?
Seriously. Use all the prediction models you have and you will not produce a
curve proving improvement in that respect even with the help of Wall Street
cheaters.
3) The sense of self-entitlement due to a high SAT score is as bad as that
due to one's skin color or birthplace.
4) Leaving those less fortunate to rot in hell is fairness at its worst.
5) 你们反对了这个政策会成为其他少数族裔的敌人,而搬石头砸自己的脚. Hello?
Isn't that obvious? For proof, just ask your co-workers who are African American,
Hispanic American, or Native American: "If I support the removal of the race
consideration factor from the college admission process, would you still treat
me as your friend?" And ask why! Get your answers directly from your fellow
minority representatives. Make sure you know where your escape route is.
In God we trust. Everyone else? Bring your argument!