批判基督教是否违法? (转载)# WaterWorld - 未名水世界
z*o
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 TrustInJesus 讨论区 】
发信人: zhaowendao (嘁哩喀喳), 信区: TrustInJesus
标 题: 批判基督教是否违法?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Feb 13 20:57:02 2015, 美东)
本人对基督教的批判,是从“圣经”出发,以子之矛,攻子之盾,基们和我辩论几个回
合就哑口无言。
本人对基督教的批判,逻辑严谨,证据清楚,就算官司打到最高法院又能如何?最近有
个跳梁小丑叫嚷要打官司,我转网友在美一方的旧帖给大家普及一点常识:
====================================
看看wiki上对于Blasphemy laws的解释http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy。美国没有被列在那些刑法里还有亵渎罪的国家列表里面。而谈到美国的时候,请注意这两段话,更要重点看最后加重的美国最高法院的判决。
The last person to be jailed in the United States for blasphemy was Abner
Kneeland in 1838, as decided by the Massachusetts case Commonwealth v.
Kneeland. However, this was prior to the ratification of the 14th Amendment
incorporating the Bill of Rights to apply to the states and not just the
federal government.
The US Supreme Court in Joseph Burstyn, Inc v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952)
held that the New York State blasphemy law was an unconstitutional prior
restraint on freedom of speech. The court stated that "It is not the
business of government in our nation to suppress real or imagined attacks
upon a particular religious doctrine, whether they appear in publications,
speeches or motion pictures."
我大致翻译一下美国最高法院的声明:“在我们国家,政府无权压制对一个具体宗教教
义的真实的或想象性的攻击,无论这种攻击是以出版物、演说或电影的形式”。
不是总是有建议说要根据中美两国公认的邪教正教的说法来界定网络论坛里对正邪的把
握么?那好,我们也可以很可理喻地说,对这里帖子尺度的把握,就来根据中美两国的
世俗法律和案例来实施好了。
既然攻击宗教教义不违犯美国法律,我另一个帖子里也举证了在公共场所反基也不违犯
中国法律,那些关于这里反基是侵犯他人宗教自由的呱噪,就歇了吧。弱!
发信人: zhaowendao (嘁哩喀喳), 信区: TrustInJesus
标 题: 批判基督教是否违法?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Feb 13 20:57:02 2015, 美东)
本人对基督教的批判,是从“圣经”出发,以子之矛,攻子之盾,基们和我辩论几个回
合就哑口无言。
本人对基督教的批判,逻辑严谨,证据清楚,就算官司打到最高法院又能如何?最近有
个跳梁小丑叫嚷要打官司,我转网友在美一方的旧帖给大家普及一点常识:
====================================
看看wiki上对于Blasphemy laws的解释http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy。美国没有被列在那些刑法里还有亵渎罪的国家列表里面。而谈到美国的时候,请注意这两段话,更要重点看最后加重的美国最高法院的判决。
The last person to be jailed in the United States for blasphemy was Abner
Kneeland in 1838, as decided by the Massachusetts case Commonwealth v.
Kneeland. However, this was prior to the ratification of the 14th Amendment
incorporating the Bill of Rights to apply to the states and not just the
federal government.
The US Supreme Court in Joseph Burstyn, Inc v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952)
held that the New York State blasphemy law was an unconstitutional prior
restraint on freedom of speech. The court stated that "It is not the
business of government in our nation to suppress real or imagined attacks
upon a particular religious doctrine, whether they appear in publications,
speeches or motion pictures."
我大致翻译一下美国最高法院的声明:“在我们国家,政府无权压制对一个具体宗教教
义的真实的或想象性的攻击,无论这种攻击是以出版物、演说或电影的形式”。
不是总是有建议说要根据中美两国公认的邪教正教的说法来界定网络论坛里对正邪的把
握么?那好,我们也可以很可理喻地说,对这里帖子尺度的把握,就来根据中美两国的
世俗法律和案例来实施好了。
既然攻击宗教教义不违犯美国法律,我另一个帖子里也举证了在公共场所反基也不违犯
中国法律,那些关于这里反基是侵犯他人宗教自由的呱噪,就歇了吧。弱!